Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
    • Thank you so much for the advice  I will try and up my savings to £500 for the next 6 months. Although I do still have an uphill battle, I feel more able to deal with it.  I hope my experience with the cifas marker helps someone else who finds themselves in that quite horrible situation. It is a huge weight off my shoulders getting it removed.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Statute of limitations or The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4650 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

no you can fill it in yourself.

 

have you printied of the time to pay?

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ida,

Yeah I printed it off & read through it. I think what is confusing me is the bottom of page 3 seems to be something which is to be filled in by the court and if this is the case it shouldn't be in any way attached to a document sent to the courts by an applicant - this is something the courts have to provide.

 

Thanks for getting back to me about this :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok ill skim over it

 

page 1

 

your name and address ( if the charge for payment is in your name and partners/spouse then you need to fill in one each but need to put on it JOINT APPLICATION on all pages)

 

name and address on the charge for payment who the sheriff officers are collection for

 

score over (a) and write charge for payment at (b)

 

score over b c and d

 

page 2:

 

self explanitory but if you want i always find it better to make up your own I and E showing all incomeing and outgoing on a seperate sheet and attach a copy to it and just fill in the boxes and write over where they have incomeing and exp " please see detailed attached sheet"

 

 

page 3:

 

score out 2, 3 and 4 and sign and date under no 4.

 

 

you need to inlcude the charge for payment with it o0r at copy of it and return it to the court on the charge for payment, either by SD or hand deliver.

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

the bit at then end you see, the sheriff clerk will fill that out when it has been dealt with by the court, it should be there.

 

what will happen next is the court will send a copy to the SO and they will either accpet it or as the court for a hearing where you will need to attend to confirm you income etc

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again.

 

That's brilliant - thanks.

 

I'm actually writing to all concerned (SO, Sheriff Court, Council) anyway prior to sending this off as I was contacting the Council (about the CTax) for a year when we moved in but they ignored me. We're due a rebate for loss of use of a room.

 

Also was querying amount of benefit awarded.

 

My problem is that I want these enquiries dealt with before this matter moves on - which I guess is my fault as they clearly expected me to keep banging my head off a brick wall to no avail indefinitely, and I frankly lost all motivation to keep trying to force them to do their job & actually answer my questions.

 

My mood over this isn't helped by the fact the SO who came to the house initially to serve the "Charge for Payment of Money" was a Gene Hunt wannabe (have you seen Ashes to Ashes??) who attempted to threaten & intimidate me. Had my partner not appeared at the back of me & literally told him to back off, I would've phoned the police. I mean, I'm no shrinking violet but still. What a plonker.

 

Oh yeah, and they've put the wrong employer on the arrestment. The Council have all the right details so I'm guessing some numpty at the SO's has misspelled the company name and just picked the first one from Companies House's list.

 

Scott & Co - surprise surprise. Stupid & Co more like. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

just remember you have 14 days from the date of the charge for payment.

 

nothing you stopping you do both as this will reduce the overall amount anyway

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I am keeping this totally anonymous.

If a person lives in Scotland and has a debt with an English bank which of the above two statutes applies?

I am sure this question has been clarified somewhere on this site but I cannot find any reference anywhere.

I assume it is the residence of the debtor which determines the right Act but would like some confirmation

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would begin by looking at the contract. You will probably find that it refers to the governing law somewhere towards the end.

 

After that I would want to look at where the contract was made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is part of the problem. A copy of the contract is not available because it is unenforceable because they have not provided the requested copy under s78. It is now coming up to four years since any acknowledgment which is why I was asking. Mainly out of curiosity. It may well be irrelevant due to the unenforcability status anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it a consumer and not business debt then the prescription act applied after residing in Scotland a min of 3 month

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi there. Your contract would likely state that the contract is governed by English Law (if this is where the company is based)..... that said there are ways in which this doesn't apply, from personal experience.

- If anyone visits your property, in Scotland this is illegal without prior appointment (unless the visitor is a Sheriff's Officer).

- You can argue that the terms of the Prescription & Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 apply as you are resident in Scotland & if the company bothers to acknowledge it they can only state 'the contract states English Law applies' - which brings you back to the unenforceable nature of the debt in the absence of a copy of the Contract as requested under s.78. They may argue that their T&C's are 'standard' so this statement applies. It may do, but as they are unable to provide you with the legally required copy they shoot themselves in the foot.

 

Hope this makes sense.

 

I had a lot of success with clearing my credit record 10 years ago of my youthful stupidities that never came asking for money, or indeed were paid but left on my credit record longer than is allowed.

Good luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...