Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I will annotate the message I sent for the forum.  Sorry, didn't see this straight away...
    • I went back to the area, this photo is taken on entry. My vehicle was parked in the first space on the left.    Would you say there is sufficient signage ? It’s different to the street view as one sign is missing. The sign nearest to where I parked is 2.23m above ground! So even if the car had been reversed parked in front of it, I don’t think it could be seen. PCN PPM.pdf
    • Thank you. I expect that @dx100uk will be along soon to give advice. Meanwhile, I really wonder whether the default date – as being the starting point of the six years – something which has been decided in law. It has always seemed to me to be extremely unfair. According to the limitation act, the six year period begins from the date on which the cause of action accrued. This normally means that the breach of contract occurred. Section 6 of the limitation act says that in terms of loans, the cause of action begins on the date that the debt was "demanded". Over the past two years this has come to mean the date that the default notice was issued – but I have to say I don't find that very satisfactory. If you received demands for payment before then then I don't see why section 6 shouldn't refer to that date. Did you not receive any correspondence at all in 2017/2018? What was the value of the original loan – and how much you pay off? I see that there was some kind of instalment agreement. Tell us about that. See what my colleague @dx100uk says but anyway, if I were you I would send off an SAR immediately both to the claimant and also to the original creditor. It costs you nothing. There is no downside. Get in the post straightaway with some kind of utility bill establishing your identity. You can even include a copy of the claim form as well as proof of your identity
    • £749.69 court fee £70 legal fee £70 total £889.68 MyJar TM.pdf
    • Please read and complete the following posting your responses back here for further advice. Topic title amended.   .     .
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bankruptcy Proceedings


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4643 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

1st credit/connaught are going to start bankruptcy proceedings against me unless I pay the full amount outstanding (£9500 halifax credit card) my application to have the statutory demand set aside was refused as the judge had care or understanding of the Consumer Credit Act.

I have now offered a weekly payment to 1st credit and have made 2 payments, they have refused this due to the length of time it would take to repay the debt (they had accepted less before)

Is their anything else I can do?

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Have you got their refusal to accept your offer of payment in writing? And did you make your offer in writing?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you back up your offer with an I&E at all...

 

They might threaten it but do they have a reason to go through with it? do you own property and have equity available to repay this debt?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Have a look here for some of the strategies.

I wonder if a time order may be the way to go here? This would allow the courts to reschedule the debt and providing you kept to repayments they couldn't proceed with the petition. Time is short though, you need to act quickly whatever you do.

 

On what basis did you apply for the set aside?

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent a Subject Access Request to Halifax yet to get all the data so you can calculated the PPI? If not you need to do this ASAP. Link to SAR template in my blog linked below.

Did you receive a default notice? If so could you possibly scan and post it up after removing personal details?

Are they still in default of your CCA Request?

Did you receive a Notice of Assignment when the debt was sold?

You need to dig out all the possible modes of defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SAR sent to Halifax, have copies of statements, no default notice, no notice of assignment provided by Halifax but connaught have produced one which I think does not originally come from Halifax.

Still no credit agreement from connaught but judge at the set aside hearing claimed the copy of application form is good enough

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Halifax may have sent a notice of assignment orginally, I can not remember.

Halifax did not send one when I sent the SAR.

I have 2 notices of assignment one which Connaught produced with the correct date which matches statements and one which turned up in the post dated two years later

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose that just about meets the requirements of a notice of assignment.

I would certainly agree that a time order should be considered as remedy.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

The second notice of assignment I have is dated 05/11/2010 a long time after the first one.

I read somwhere that HBOS had stopped selling to 1st credit in April 2009.

Why would the halifax send another later dated notice of assignment.

How would I apply for a time order, I am seeing somebody in my local law centre tommorw.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a good move, the person you see should be able to advise on the procedure for applying

for a time order.

As to the NOA who knows could be just a clerical foul up,or just reinforcing the fact of the assignment.

Edited by BRIGADIER2JCS

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please be aware that it is very unlikley you would be made to sell your house even if equity is held. Its not as bad as it used to be years ago!

 

Could you elaborate on this please.

I've always understood that if the BR goes ahead and there is equity, then the OR will almost certainly expect the property to be sold.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It does I believe vary on the amount of equity, and the other circumstance s of the order, including the

costs of the sale ttc.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see.

 

So lets say a property has 20k equity, but is jointly owned.

10k of that would belong to the other person.

Cost of sale is lets say £3k, leaving £7k

 

I would assume the house would be sold?

 

But, if the above equity was less and the final amount available was let's say only £1k, then a sale may not be likely, but would be continually reviewed throughout the 3 year period of the IPO??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would presume so, but with the property market stagnant,but with costs still

rising and the fees for bankruptcy petitions rising by 16.5% + as of now careful consideration

I think will influence creditor decisions.

The insolvency service is strapped for funds and redundancies are happening due to cost

cutting so fees are likely to rise further.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...