Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see below for an extract from the letter more about my case.    You have been convicted of two matters of failing to give driver details linked to two speeding offences and been disqualified in your absence. You confirmed that you did not receive the court documentation and the first you knew about the cases was on 3/6/24. As you can make a statutory declaration it is possible that we will be able to persuade the police to accept pleas to either or both of the speeding offences as they were committed within a very short space of time and withdraw the two fail to give driver details offences as normally if you plead to one or other of the speeding or fail to give driver details the prosecution will withdraw the other related offence. If successful you would not face a totting ban. In respect of the speeding offences, it could be argued they were committed on one occasion due to the proximity of the time and location and we may be able to persuade the prosecution to drop one of the speeding offences. You are technically guilty of all the offences because you accept it was you driving when the speeding offences were committed and that you did not update your change of address with the leasing company when it was your responsibility. If the prosecution will not withdraw the two failures to give driver details offences, you will face a totting ban but will be able to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. This may or may not go ahead at the court hearing date, so we need to prepare for all eventualities. As a safeguard we have lodged the appeal and applied to suspend your ban pending appeal due to the time limit for being able to automatically appeal without getting leave of the Judge. The court have dealt with the matter very quickly and have actually listed your matter for an application to suspend the disqualification pending appeal on the above-mentioned date. We could actually use this date to make the statutory declaration in court having explained the situation to the magistrates and then see if the prosecution will agree to accept pleas to one or both of the speeding offences as a way of resolving the matter without the need for you to put forward an exceptional hardship argument. It is possible the case would need to be adjourned so that we can make those representations, or the court may want to go ahead and hear the exceptional hardship argument. The outcome of your case is always at the discretion of the Court.  
    • Hi,    I will look over your case shortly.   I am sorry for the delay.
    • Judges are now loaded and they are both deputies 😕
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCO Customer Compliance Officer! DWP


stan80
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, I'm new.

Well about 10 days ago i received a letter from the JobCentre informing me i would receive a visit from the CCO.

 

Before arrival of the CCO to my home address i rang her up. She informed me a allegation of fraud had been made against me.

 

Having done nothing wrong, nothing to worry about. So done a bit more research before the main event and found out im allowed to record the interview which the CCO must accept.

 

On arrival i informed the CCO of my request to record the interview which she objected to and terminated the interview with a immediate effect!

 

Just wondered how i should play this now? Has she broken any rules regarding my basic human right to record a interview? She breached her employment contract? Any advice and suggestions would be muchly appreciated!

 

Thanks

Stan80

Edited by ErikaPNP
edit in line with forum rules
Link to post
Share on other sites

You have the right to record anything in the privacy of your own home, and yes she does have to accept the recording.

 

She won't have broken her employment contract as her employment contract sets out the terms and conditions of her employment but not the job description in itself.

 

She has however breached policy, which states that requests to record an interview must be accepted.

A complaint will likely result in her receiving further training to ensure she is aware of the policy and complies with it. Continuous breaches would likely lead to her being disciplined.

 

I'd suggest raising it as a complaint, pointing out that chapter 4, paraghraph 15 of the Customer Compliance guidance states the following:

The customer may ask to record the interview. Requests to do so must be accepted. The same principles apply in Scotland.
and that she has not adhered to this.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would mark it for the restricted attention of the Compliance Manager and address it to the local Jobcentre.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

-UPDATE-

 

Send my complaint letter off yesterday to a (edit). Top dog in the area. Got proof of postage also.

 

Now today at 13.25hrs i received a phone call from a (edit) who was a CCO manager! She asked why i wanted the interview recorded? I stated that it was perfectly in my right to record it! She then clearly stated verbally over the phone that any of her CCO do not have to accept a customers request to interview them recorded! She had the CCO guidance in front of her. At this point she had me on the hop so i stated i had evidence to the contarary. Then either there was a line fault or she hung up on me. Typical! I have rearranged my appointment and (edit) will be interviewing me as the other CCO objects to been recorded!

 

What the hell is going on im confused! Are there new guidance rules out im not awear of as im sure they must have to accept a customer request to record interview!!!!

Edited by ErikaPNP
please do not post names of individuals
Link to post
Share on other sites

The guidance that I have is in the CAG library. You can link to it here. Access the compliance zip file, open the comliance folder and open the word doc numbered 4, entitled 'undertaking the customer compliance interview'. It's paragraph 15 which is entitled 'Recording of Interviews'

 

If there has been an amendment to it, I'm not aware of it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

Received a letter from the (edit) District Manager

 

He stated yes if a customer requests interview to be recorded if must be accepted however if the Customer Compliance Officer feels uncomfortable the request can be rejected and interview terminated.

 

So there i am doing a snotty letter back saying if she feels uncomfortable been recorded in someones home then she is unfit to do her job properly.

 

Also im getting a visit by the area CCO manager and another CCO on Wednesday. So two of them will be visiting me now. Which i object too so that will be documented in my letter and i will only let one of them in to my home.

 

Will keep you lot updated to progress. Oh i love a fight with authority. Makes me blood boil..

Edited by ErikaPNP
please do not post names of individuals
Link to post
Share on other sites

There is nothing in the guidance which states that they can reject, terminate or reschedule if an official is uncomfortable. The exact wording states that requests must be accepted, there is no exclusion contained within the guidance which allows for what they are stating. I agree with you that if they are not prepared to accept and allow something which the guidance states they must accept, then they are not suitable for that particular role.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Received a letter from the (edit) District Manager

 

He stated yes if a customer requests interview to be recorded if must be accepted however if the Customer Compliance Officer feels uncomfortable the request can be rejected and interview terminated.

 

 

what a nonsensical letter does the manager not understand english? If something is a must it cant be rejected it is not a request. The sentence makes no sense it would be laughable if it wasn't serious. This person is a manager!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, they should be made to do it, they are plenty of people at work have to do what they might not like.

 

First issue what has that person got to hide? after all, nothing to worry about id giving truthful and correct information

Another issue is waste of pubic money :(

 

Now they want to send two people! a total joke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...