Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Law Project are trying to force HMG to release details of how Sunak's hedge fund made large profits from Moderna. Government ordered to disclose Sunak’s hedge fund emails - Good Law Project GOODLAWPROJECT.ORG Good Law Project has won a battle with the Treasury after it tried to suppress emails between Rishi Sunak and the hedge fund he founded.  
    • Nick Wallis has written up the first day of Angela van den Bogerd's evidence to the inquiry. I thought she was awful. She's decided to go with being not bright enough to spot what was happening over Fujitsu altering entries on the Horizon system, rather than covering up important facts. She's there today as well. The First Lady of Flat Earth – Post Office Scandal WWW.POSTOFFICESCANDAL.UK Angela van den Bogerd, on oath once more It is possible that Angela van den Bogerd and her senior colleagues (Rodric Williams, Mark Davies, Susan...  
    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Npower Unauthorised Direct Debit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6245 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently had a direct debit taken from one of my accounts by Npower. I have never had an account with this company so was understandably concerned as to how this company was able to take money from my Halifax account.

 

I have written to both organisations concerned who have effectively blamed each other without adequately explaining what happened and how. Npower have offered to repay the amount but have ignored my request for a consolatory payment (made via Energywatch). I requested such a payment due to the undue worry caused as a result of what I consider a breach of confidentiality and ultimately a 'theft' from my account. I also spent 20 minutes reporting the problem to Npower all at my cost having done nothing myself to instigate the problem.

 

Can anyone advise as to what action I might be able to take against either organisation? Should I close the account as I am now concerned that my account/personal details have been compromised?

 

Has anyone else experienced a similar instance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...
Guest HUSBANDKHAN

this was taken without your permission and also breaks the direct debit gaurantee. your bank should refund this immediately. if they do not tell the bank you want to file a fraud claim. this will soon get them on your side. you should recieve a set of forms which you should fill in and send back . give them 5-7 days. if you recieved any charges these will be refunded to.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response, was beginning to think i'd raised a 'taboo' subject!

 

Yes they did refund the money but I remain concerned about how easy it was for the organisation concerned to get money from my account. Have written to Halifax and Npower and they basically blame each other.

 

I'm simply looking for an explanation, someone to accept responsibilty, an apology, assurance that similar mistakes will not occur in futrure and possibly some kind of compensatory/consolatary payment for the worry caused as a result of their actions! Not much to ask for is it?!!! Well actually i guess it is! :o

 

Was considering runing my complaint past the financial ombudsman if both organisations continue to pass the buck. My only concern here is that I have been to them before regarding another matter and found them to be pretty ineffective and to be honest downright unhelpful.

 

Any other suggestions? This must has happened to other people or am I the only one who is concerned about such breaches in confidentiality in these current times of ID theft etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they did refund the money but I remain concerned about how easy it was for the organisation concerned to get money from my account. Have written to Halifax and Npower and they basically blame each other.

 

If you have not set up a DD for npower responsibility must lie with your Bank.

 

At the very least they have been negligent in allowing access to your account without your express written authority.

 

Write and ask them to make a payment to compensate you for your time and out of pocket expenses. Suggest a figure double the amount you feel is reasonable as they are sure half any amount you suggest.

 

Send it to your branch and copy it to the CE at their Head Office.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion is its Npowers fault.

 

They made the request to your bank for the DD order. The bank did not just send them the money.

 

See any company can now set up a DD over the phone, they do not need your signature but they must by law read out the direct debit guarantee.

 

So Npower either correctly or at fault asked for monies from your account. The bank assumes they have followed the set procedures.

However if in dispute the bank must give an imediete refund.

 

 

Direct Debit Guarantee

 

In future if there is a change to the date, amount or frequency of your direct debit, we will always give you at least 7 working days notice in advance of your account being debited. In the event of any error, you are entitled to an immediate refund from your bank or building society. You have the right to cancel at any time and this guarantee is offered by all the banks & building societies that take part in the direct debit scheme. A copy of the safeguards under the direct debit guarantee will be sent to you with the confirmation letter

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

My opinion is its Npowers fault. .

 

How can that be if the OP doesn't have an account with them? What's preventing any utility saying 'Mr X has an account with us and pay us the money' because we want you to, to your bank? That's money by deception, and far stronger than this laughable DD 'Guarantee'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is money by deception and is refundable straight away by the bank. But the deception os that of N powers side for taking it without the acc holders permission. Probably due to an advisor setting up DD on an account and entering a digit incorrectly.

 

What's preventing any utility saying 'Mr X has an account with us and pay us the money' because we want you to

 

Thats the problem, not enough to stop it happening but it does and can.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

How did they get my account details? That's a good question! Don't know - when I phoned to query they eventually confirmed that I did not and never have had an account with them. Interestingly though they did at first ask if I had lived at a certain another address (interestingly, in my town) which I confirmed had not been the case. It sounded to me like they had an account in arrears from a customer who shared my surname. When raising this issue in a letter again both the bank and Npower denied knowledge of this. This makes me think that there perhaps was some liaison between Npower and Halifax and that it wasn't just an automated process where perhaps someone had pressed the wrong button and requested a payment from my account.

 

Both organisations have refunded the monies taken but I remain concerned about what I still consider a breach of confidentiality - proving it is I guess the difficulty here!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - it could have been a coincidence, but it's one heck of a long shot. My view is that it is your bank that is playing fast and loose with your money, and irrespective of the fact they've refunded, I'd want an explanation as to how sugh an unauthorised debit could EVER be taken from your bank account without authority. The more noise you make, the more likely an honest explanation might be provided.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Okonski I think I'll take your advice and write another 'robust' letter along with the correspondence received from Npower and see what explanation they come back with.

 

Frankly I'm pretty amazed that a) banks can do this and b) it seems that there is little that can be done about what I feel is a massive breach of confidentiality in, as I said before 'an age of identity theft' etc. I really feel that such a breach should be worth a great deal more than the small amount they paid out from my account without my knowledge.

 

Thanks for the pointers anyway guys.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget to keep this thread updated so we know what's happening! The days of when they was mutual loyalty between banks and account holders has long gone. With the T&Cs rewritten so that they can disclose your banking details to CRA's was the final straw for me. The matress looks more secure than some of the 'products' they offer in the marketplace. And with head offices in Hong Kong, Shanhai and Spain - its little wonder we're hacked off!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Had the same thing with a false direct debit for car insurance from provident we did not recognise the reason for the direct debit so cancled it the following month it was set up again and Halifax allowed it so we got the details from Halifax for which company was setting up the direct debit found out then that it was provident and the car being insured was in west sussex where i have no relations or any dealings Halifax repaid the debits that had been paid but had put charges on my account for insufficient funds to pay this direct debit and even when these were proven to be fraudulent Halifax refused payment saying it was down to provident to pay them we contacted provident who said fine we will pay them back please provide details from Halifax Halifax refused to co-operate and provide the details Halifax also infrmed us that they could do nothing to prevent this happening again we requested a change of account details and were refused luckily we found this forum and took them for every charge ever applied but Halifax do not give a fig for thier customers if you are defrauded they blame you as buzby said its no wonder we get hacked off

they even told us it was £5 per sheet for statements or letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Haliufax BoS are in a world of their own - if jdene's situation happened to me I'd never enter into correspondence with Provident, simply advise the Bank that they owed me £XXX in incorrect charges caused by a fraudulent debit - and send a LBA to show I'm not taking this lying down!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had this happen three times over the years, e.g. direct debits being set up without my approval, sometimes more than once.

 

The Bank makes no checks as to whether the mandate they're being asked to set up is authorised by the customer.

 

It's basically the same as if they abandoned the need for you to key in your PIN number at the checkout, told all retailers to scrap that part, and just assume that the card is being presented by the card holder and is authorised.

 

I've recently moved to the Halifax and have already written to them once to ask them to guarantee me that no DDs will ever be permitted on my account because I never use them. They have not replied so I'm about to follow it up with a second letter by recorded delivery.

 

I don't see why you need to contact NPower. The Bank are in breach of duty of care here and you simply need to a) have them refund it immediately and b) guarantee you they won't do something so silly as to allow themselves to be defrauded next time.

 

Then leave the ball in their court. If they allow it again, you warned them: it isn't your money that's being paid out here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi all, I had the same thing happen to me

 

From reading this thread it looks like setting up an unauthorized Direct Debit is a contrevention of the Theft Act Section 15A. Obtaining a money transfer by deception.

 

If this is the case, how is it covered in the Fraud act after the abolition of the deception offences in schedule 1.

 

In my case, the original offence took place in Sept 2006 and is therefore covered by the Theft act. I was alerted to it in Oct, but decided to leave the DDM in place as I was disputing the debt owed to the company which set it up and I didn't want to affect my credit rating or acrue any other charges if I was found to be in debt to the company.

 

So, an amount has been taken each month since, the last at the beginning of March. Are the debits Sept - Jan covered by the theft act, and Feb - Mar by the Fraud act, or do all debits obtained from an unauthorized DDM fall under the auspices of the act under which they were originally commited.

 

In effect is each debit a separate offence, or was there one offence (the fraudulent application to my bank for the DDM to be set up).

 

Is there any precedent for banks being tried in a criminal court for un-authorized DDMs. Under the Theft Act there is a maximun 10 year sentence for Obtaining a Money Transfer by Deception.

 

Quite interested in this one because a particularly nasty lender may have shot themselves in the foot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tried this 4 years ago, and it doesn't work! The type of money transfer the act specifically refers to is the typee that banks charge £25+ for, not the more mundane BACS. The police took the view that the it was a civil offence as the customer either authorised the DD originally, or could sue the merchant in the courts for the return of the funds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police ALWAYS take the view it's a civil matter but they are wrong to say so (& they know it). To remove money from a persons bank account 'without their consent' is theft. Unfortunatley it's a sad fact that an ordinary member of the public making such a complaint is going to get the bums rush as the police can't be bothered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest louis wu

Have just come across this thread and I'm gobsmacked.

 

Just when you think you have a grip of exactly how sloppy/crafty/incompetant the banks are, something else come along a plunges them to new depths.

 

Makes my blood boil. Cant wait for the whistleblow program, I'm convinced that far more 'depths' are going to be shown up.

 

Kieth, hope your still subscribed, as I am very curious if you got any kind of positive responce.

 

Louis

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has happened to me twice. On the first occasion, the RAC took well over £100 for membership; I was not a member. They refused to refund unless I proved I had not asked for the DD to be set up, despite the fact that membership was not in another name and the address was hundreds of miles away. The bank refunded under the DD gtee and subsequently the RAC wrote and apologised, citing a salesman's error in writing the account number. Quite how he also got the sort code and account name wrong too, and why the bank didn't check the signature was not explained.

 

On the second occasion I had a fixed monthly DD of £8 to London Electric (now Electricite de Frog or somesuch), which was for gas at my house (which I rarely get to, hence the low amount). I was on ops in Iraq, and received a letter saying that LE had taken, via DD, over £350 as an 'annual adjustment. I immediately wrote to both my bank and LE. LE clearly failed to read my letter, simply sending a standard 'phone our 0800 number' response. The bank refunded the amount under the DD gtee. I cancelled my DDs to LE, and told them I'd pay by cheque in future. They tried to set up new DDs many times over the next few weeks, which is apparently a common practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The other worry these days, is they don;t even NEED a signature, or to send your bank anything to prove their arrangement with you. They can 'assert' that you gave permission (even verbally) and the bank will accept that the name, account and sort code is enough proof that the DD can be set up. Incredible loss of control for consumers, but they still believe the mantra that it is somehow 'better' for their lifestyle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Direct debits are set up between the originator (eg npower) and the customer. The bank take on face value that the customer has given authority. The direct debit guarantee should refund you almost straight away but you might have to insist that the bank does it for you. In this case NPower are at fault but Halifax should have helped you out much quicker. Not surprised with these companies as I expect that neither are good at looking after their customers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Npower Unauthorised Direct Debit
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...