Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Third party HASNT REPORTED CLAIM Please help ( CAR OFFROAD)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4719 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Somebody hit the driver side rear of my car when i was stationary at a traffic light.

I got a quote and was too expensive for him to repair so went to an accident management as im only third party and claiming off his insurance company.

 

Im pretty sure he wasnt insured properly as he was adament not to go through insurance, the car was insured at the time of the accident.

 

Its been a month now and accident management company said he cancelled his policy a week after the accident and is not responding to his insurance company so his insurance company are investigating. (BUT HE WAS INSURED AT THE TIME)

I have inpdependent witnesses that saw it ( middle of town) who filled in forms and have lots a pictures with the driver and witnesses in the pictures.They have sent this + car repair estimates to the other insurer

 

I read that even if he wasnt insured properly they have to act as an article 75 insurer.. The accident management company wont give me a hire because its not straight forward (hes not responding)

My cars in the garage just waiting for liability before repairing ( engineers report already done)

Its been over a month now and hes not responding (i dont think he ever will)

 

UPDATE

today the solicitor told me they passed it on to the liabilty team

What does this mean?

 

 

Are they obliged to pay up?

 

please help

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are obliged to pay, as evidence of their policyholders liability has been provided. By the sounds of it, the 3rd party Insurers are getting ready to make the relevant payments. Or it could be that they will be probing liability further. Personally I think they should be forced (court action if necessary) to get on with it and if they have a problem with their policyholder they should sort it out after.

 

It sounds like the 3rd party driver had reason to take flight. Was there a discrepancy with the details they provided to the Insurer when they arranged the policy ? Was the driver the actual policyholder or just someone borrowing the car ? Was this a case of fronting i.e a younger main driver, using mum and dad to Insure their car to obtain cheaper Insurance. Whatever the reason, they were hiding something, which they did not want their Insurers to know about. This is not your problem, so your accident management company should start acting a bit more forceably if they don't gain movement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this was the case, thank you very much

They are calling them on tuesday for a response, hopefully they will have a decision by then

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this was the case, thank you very much

They are calling them on tuesday for a response, hopefully they will have a decision by then

 

 

 

I forgot to say he cancelled his policy 1 week after the accident that's why they said they have issues with paying

Surely this shouldnt matter as it was insured at the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to say he cancelled his policy 1 week after the accident that's why they said they have issues with paying

Surely this shouldnt matter as it was insured at the time?

 

No you didn't forget. Either you were tired or couldn't read through beer goggles.

 

Does not make a difference, as they were still Insured at the time. It is just a pain for their Insurers as their policyholder is on the run, so they can't find out their story. I suspect that the 3rd party Insurers will investigate their policyholder futher and even threaten legal proceedings against them. Not that this should affect you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor phoned the third party insurance today and they said they havnt reviewed it yet... its waiting to be reviewed

I asked to issue court proceedings but they apparently have 90 days ( its been 45) before any legal proceedings can be issued

 

I am getting really frustrated and feel there is nothing i can do

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor phoned the third party insurance today and they said they havnt reviewed it yet... its waiting to be reviewed

I asked to issue court proceedings but they apparently have 90 days ( its been 45) before any legal proceedings can be issued

 

I am getting really frustrated and feel there is nothing i can do

 

 

That is correct, the third party insurers have 3 months under the pre-action protocol in which to investigate that claim so there is nothing you can do for another 45 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...