Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Westcot v Father In Law with dementia


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4728 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello good people, I am hoping that you can give me some of your sage advice. My Father in law (FIL) has an 11k debt that he has been making a voluntary small monthly payment towards (£35). FIL has dementia and has recently deteriorated to the point where he has been taken into hospital for his, and everyone else's protection. He is currently being found a place in a care home. His only income is his pension which will be going towards paying for his care. My Mother in Law also only lives on her pension and so does not have the money to continue to pay this amount to Westcot. (I don't know how they afforded it up to now anyway?).

 

I have told her that she should write to Westcot explaining the situation and telling them that FIL can no longer afford to make the payments and that they should write off the debt. I can't see them taking this to court can you? FIL is not even of sound mind any more so I don't see that he can really be held responsible for this debt anymore? btw. There is not likely to be anything left in a will should he die as they don't have anything.

 

I would appreciate your collective wisdom in this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

What sort of debt is it, and who was the OC?

 

Writing to Westcot is a good idea. Don't ask. Tell them that there is no way they can sustain this payment amount. Offer what they can realistically afford.

 

Sarah

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday, and all is well!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi & Welcome,

I am sorry for your situation I know what it's like my father suffered in much the same way.

Are you authorised to act on FILs behalf?

Firstly write to Wetcloths and explain the situation that there is no income to meet any payments, stress

that this will cause extreme hardship if payments have to be made.

Don't worry about Wetcloths making any threats about court action no judge would make an award of more than £1.00

per month in your in laws situation if any award was made at all.

Keep the letter simple and to the point.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Hf

 

Sorry to hear of the situation re your FIL

 

If this is not a joint debt whereby your MIL is named on the agreement then it's nothing to do with her and she can't be expected to take over any payments

 

As for your FIL and his payments write to Wescot explaining what's happened and TELL them that given the circumstances all they'll be getting from now on is £1 token payment and remind them of the fact that as members of the CSA they are bound be their Code of Practice . . . .

 

 

l) Have due regard and dealsensitively with

 

individuals where evidence has been given,

 

or is apparent, that the individual is

 

incapacitated by mental or physical disability.

 

 

p) Take into consideration before determining

 

whether to enforce repayment, allinformation

 

supplied in relation to the reason fornonpayment,

 

which may include The Common

 

Financial Statement, or the debtor’sfuture ability

 

to repay. If the debtor has disclosedmultiple

 

debt problems, inform them of theavailability of

 

accredited advisory services. Whereavailable,

 

provide in all relevant correspondencethe name

 

or designation of a specially trainedmember of

 

staff who may be contacted regardingfinancial

 

difficulties.

 

 

You might find that Wescot might ask for written proof that you can act on your FIL's behalf though

 

I'm sure more advice will follow

 

Good luck

 

R

Edited by Revenant

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] I asked them to wait whilst I got my Bank card :violin:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Information that may help if a CCA request is refused due to the lack of a signature . . http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?248863-Signature-demands-fight-back-possible-!&highlight=

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your speedy replies...I am not acting legally on behalf of my FIL but trying to take the weight off MIL by composing something for her to send to Westcot, and obtaining the best possible adivice from people who know what they are talking about (namely all of you). So the concensus is that an offer of £1 per month would be preferable to asking for the debt to be written off?

Link to post
Share on other sites

prob didnt even owe it in the first place knowing wetcloths!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There would be no harm in suggesting to them that in the circumstances, the debt could be written off, but I think it unlikely they would accept it! You need to establish what the debt is, who the original creditor was etc etc. It may be that your fil has been paying them without having checked their authority to collect the debt, so it would be worth establishing how the £11k sum was arrived at......are there charges/interest added etc.

Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday, and all is well!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...