Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks Andy, There will be money left as they own their house. That's why I was thinking it may be cheaper to pay off the debts now, with a discount, rather than in full when the time comes.
    • No hard or fast rules ...if you have referred to it or intend to refer to it and rely on a document as evidence it goes on the list as an exhibit. No you can raise that within your statement but remember that sec 69 is at the discretion of the court a judge may allow the full amount claimed or reduce it to a lower % or none at all. Yes the claimant must serve their N265 on you...any document on theirs that you do not have you can request a copy and then use in your statement. Will it assist your defence ?
    • Hi all, I have previously been helped by the wonderful people on these forums, which helped me out of debt and to a much stronger position that I am in today, for which I am eternally grateful. My debts were all cleared, I now have no debt (apart from a mortgage) and an excellent credit file. I did also show my gratitude with a donation, which even if it helps just one other person out of spiralling debt, it would have been worth it. Sadly, my elderly parents did also run up some debts a few years ago, some through loans and some through credit cards. A few years ago, my father had a medical episode which has left him paralysed on one side of his body and now is confined to a wheelchair, and is pretty much non verbal (he can only manage a handful of words, and gets confused easily). I'm seriously not sure how far any County Court Action would get against him due to his current state, if any of the DCAs were to proceed down that route. Luckily nonw have tried, but can only think that any action would be discontinued by a judge. Before his medical episode he did set up a payment plan with some of the DCAs that were chasing him, which have continused being paid to this day from his bank account. They are literally minimum amounts, but obviously these actions have kept those debts current. However, some of the other debts have since become statutory barred due to the time elapsed since the last COA. My mum does have Power of Attorney over his financial affairs so can act on his behalf, with me as backup if god forbid anything happens to my mum. Their wills are set up for everything to go to the other should either of them pass away, and then to their children upon the passing of both of them, with myself being named as the executor on both of their wills. I have recently been reading up on the role of an executor, and part of the duties is to pay any outstanding liabilities before distributing the remainder of the estate. I have seen, in several instances, of a recommendation of posting about any death in the local newspaper column and the gazette to limit any future liabilities as executor in case of any debts that are unknown to myself. But this does lead me onto the debts I do know about. Am I right in thinking that the current debts that my dad has been making token payments on would have to be repaid in full to the DCAs upon his death? If that is the case, is it worth negotiating a full and final settlement, with a discount, on his behalf now? And with the debts that are statutory barred, am I correct in presuming that they would not need to be paid upon my dad's death as they wouldn't be legally enforcable in court? Thanks in advance for all of your help!
    • Hello AndyOrch For the n265 please would the below list of documents be sufficient ? 1. Pre-Action protocols. Claimant confirmation that they have not complied or have only partially complied (last page of claimants N181 Direction Questionnaire) Dated 16/04/2024 2. Copy of the Lease - Dated 4th September 1998 3. Statement of account (up to 1st Feb 2024) - Dated 20/02/2024 (This shows a slightly different balance to the one included in the Claim form as theirs was only up to 24th Jan 2024) 4. CPR 31.14 Request - Dated 28/02/2024   With regards to the Claimants claim for interest under Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 where the amount is incorrectly calculated due to the account balance and also appears to be duplicated, should I list their POC ? Additionally should I include any e-mail exchanges (I don't have all as some went to junk and auto deleted due to an issue with my e-mail account and I was reliant on my phone for seeing e-mails) ? I don't have the last e-mail that was sent prior to the claim being issued. I guess that I can ask the claimant for a copy of this one ? The claimant has refused to action the CPR 31.14 request.  Regarding the Section 20 notices relating to the major works, should I include if we have a copy ? Is there anything else that I should include in the list relevant to our defence ? Will the claimant send us a similar list via N265 ? They did include a Continuation Sheet with their N244 giving a background of the case. Just wondering how we know all of the documents that they will rely on.   As always really appreciate any help and guidance that you can provide.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot - summary cause Scotland - Merged Argos Card & Littlewoods Card help! **Case Dismissed ***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3816 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you Andy, that was the way i was looking at it but

 

 

do you think i should wait until i get something in writing from Barclaycard confirming that Cabot dont have absolute assignment

or would the letter from them saying they are refunding money to my account suffice?

 

 

Technically speaking, if Cabot do not own the Account would their attempt at court action be classed as Malicious Prosecution?

I would take them all the road if it did.

 

 

I had a couple of really bad weeks after the action was stayed.

My husband had an accident and his car was written off,

my mother had to go for an mri scan and we worried for the worst and

i had sheriff officers at my door on my silver wedding anniversary for a disputed parking ticket (my husbands) from 2008.

Never rains but it pours.

 

 

Ive pulled it back together again now.

 

 

My mums ok, we bought a new car, my son has graduated again and my other son passed his exams with flying colours,

sheriff officers got reported and the fine was scrapped with a big apology from the council.

So, im back in fighting mode and if i can nail Cabot then i will and id be doing it for everyone else on this forum thats been unfortunate enough to come across them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Wait until you have something in writing from Sharklycard in case they have made an error.If there is no error and its not been assigned then

Cagiboot have some serious questions to answer.I assume you have done all the checks on the NoA and its authenticity?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

My lawyer didnt get the information from their lawyer to check it.

 

 

Cabots lawyers stayed the case because they didnt have all the info at that time. The usual bumph and palming off scenario

 

 

i thought id do some digging by writing to Barclaycard myself and claiming back the charges, ppi

and in the letter about the double entry i specifically have asked them to confirm that Cabot have Absolute Assignment on the account.

 

 

The more i info i get back from Barclaycard in my favour, the more ammo i have to fire at Cabot is the way i have been looking at it.

 

 

If it comes back that Cabot dont own the account then i will go for the jugular, i will get the stay lifted and crucify.

 

 

Thats my philosophy on it at the moment but it scares me to think how many people have just had court papers from them and paid up without a fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi delilah,

 

I'm sorry you've been having such a dreadful time, and I'm glad all the family is now okay again.

 

Can I just ask you about your Notice of Assignment, please? My alleged Notice of Assignment is on a photocopy of Barclaycard paper and signed with an indecipherable scribble above the word 'Barclaycard'. Was yours the same? I don't believe for one moment that it actually came from Barclaycard because Barclaycard always send letters signed by an identifiable person. I'm curious to know if this is the sort of rubbish they usually send out.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daniella,

the photocopy they sent me didnt look right and it was a reconstituted version plus it had the wrong account number on it from what i remember.

 

 

Have not seen the original and the reconstituted one is with my lawyer.

 

 

When it comes to Cabot double check and treble check everything they sent you.

 

 

You could also try writing to Barclaycard and asking if Cabot have Absolute Assignment

 

Delilah

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Delilah,

 

Thank you for coming back to me. I've got several other issues with Cabot at the moment, not the least of which is that they have admitted they don't have a credit agreement. Barclays should not have sold it on (or assigned it on whatever basis) while it was in dispute. I haven't chased it up with Barclaycard yet, but will do so if Cabot continue to cause problems.

 

DD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Daniella, the photocopy they sent me didnt look right and it was a reconstituted version plus it had the wrong account number on it from what i remember. Have not seen the original and the reconstituted one is with my lawyer. When it comes to Cabot double check and treble check everything they sent you. You could also try writing to Barclaycard and asking if Cabot have Absolute Assignment

 

Delilah

 

Hi Delilah,sorry to hear about the family problems you had earlier and i am happy to hear that every things are much better.

 

 

I got Notice of Assignment from Cabot that was supposed to have been sent by Goldfish that seemed to be using the same font as Cabot use

and it contained no account number at all, bit made little difference in my case,

 

 

i was told and i read so that it can be sent from either party ,

i thought myself it should have contained a account number.

 

 

I am still waiting to receive anything from Barclay card in my SAR that was sent 2/3 weeks before my trial,

except for a letter dated before the trial that they where seeking everything they had.

 

 

Good luck Delilah and i hope you screw the bar stewards into the ground.

 

barns66

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Barns,

in all 3 replies ive had so far from Barclaycard (different departments for each) none of them have mentioned Cabot at all

so im keeping my fingers crossed.

 

 

Whatever happens now, ive got letters from Barclaycard implying that they havent sold the account

and i can only see that as going in my favour.

 

 

Just waiting on the Big One to confirm and i will "let rip".

If they never owned the account,

they have fraudulently taken payments from me (the few that i made in 2007),

fraudulently reported on my credit files for over 4 years

and harassed me with phone calls and letters when they had no right to do so

and Maliciously and fraudulently started court proceedings against me.

 

 

Even if they do have Absolute Assignment then by the time i get the PPI back it will bring the debt down to around the £2,000 mark

which, i could be wrong, but i think thats small claims court not sheriff court material (need to look into that a bit more).

 

 

Right now, they look on very dodgy ground to me but i want it in writing first before i wipe the floor with them so its a waiting game at the moment.

 

As you can see from my earlier post, life has not been easy lately but im a fighter and things are starting to look up again.

I hope everything has been ok with you and that your wife has been keeping better.

Not forgotten you, if i can nail Cabot its not just for me its for everyone thats had the misfortune of being on their target practise list.

 

Daniella, when it comes to Cabot dont leave anything to chance.

They will leave you alone for a while and then whack you when you least expect it

, a bit like a parasite which of course they are.

 

 

Deal with the original creditors such as Barclaycard directly if possible and keep all the info they send.

Cabot will tell you crap smells like roses just to get money out of you.

Get as much info as you can now and have it ready to fire back at them before anything goes to court because some judges just wont listen.

 

 

Pretty ironic that you take an oath on a bible in a court when it was Jesus himself that called Tax collectors

and Debt collectors parasites and then Lo! and Behold!! A judge with Selective Hearing Problems pops up and takes their side.

 

 

It wont do you any harm to have as much information as possible to hand, i wish id done it earlier.

 

Delilah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have decided to write to Barclaycard to ask them to send me in writing the balance prior to the refund being issued and the new balance as it stands now.

 

I have re-read their letter this morning which has come from their Complaints Department.

I think i have boobed and not read it properly.

 

It states "a refund of £xxx will be passed to our agents:-D: and the balance will be adjusted accordingly".

 

Is that an "in-house" agent or are they referring to Cabot?

Either way Barclaycard state "agent" not owner or assignee

and that still implies that Cabot dont own the account.

 

Something not quite adding up here with this but ive got a feeling its to my benefit to trip them up as much as possible

and the more i get in black and white the better.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks, have written the following to Barclaycard this morning.

Im hoping it will either kill Cabot off or at least i should get some sort of confirmation good or bad.

The following is basically what has been sent.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

 

I confirm that i am pleased to accept the refund of default charges applicable to the above account.

I note that you refer to "The agency responsible for your account has been notified and your account balance will be amended accordingly".

 

 

I have been led to believe that the account was sold to Cabot Financial by way of an Absolute Assignment

and that they are the legal owners of the debt, therefore, i require clarification as to which "agency" you refer to in your letter.

 

I also require proof from "the agency" by way of written confirmation that the refund of £340 plus £157.68 statutory interest has indeed been offset against the balance.

 

I feel like im playing Russian Roulette with this but as it stands at the moment,

i have nothing to lose and everything to gain so i might as well go for it in the hope that i get Barclaycard to slip up and give me what i need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi Folks, yipee, i have an update at last.

 

 

Received 2 separate letters this morning from Barclaycard.

 

 

First one says they are reviewing the full details of the PPI claim and should be back in touch with me no later than the 18th of October

(not bad considering they said November originally).

 

 

Next letter was about the double entry on my credit files, which goes along the following lines:

- I have fully reviewed your account along with your credit file and unfortunately in error,

we have continued to report your account with Credit Reference Agency, Call Credit resulting in a duplicate entry."

 

"In light of your comments concerning the effect this has had on your credit file, bla, bla bla.

By way of an apology we have enclosed a cheque for £250.

Very nice of them,

 

 

it was worth the price of the stamp to complain but it means that it looks very much like Cabot own the account.

 

 

This has upset me as i was looking forward to kicking ass.

Still, they dont have a compliant CCA and they have mucked up considerably on other stuff too,

so im still waiting to hear from the Legal Aid board and then i want the Sist lifted.

 

Not had any word back about the unfair charges letter yet.

Does it mean that if Cabot own the account any refund of money Barclaycard owe should come to me,

or will Cabot get their greedy little paws on it?

It should come to me, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they sent you the cheque then its yours how can it go to Cabot?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, sorry i didnt make that clear.

 

 

Its 3 separate claims i had with Barclaycard.

 

 

The cheque i got today was for the double entry on my credit files and went straight into my bank account.

 

 

Another for the unfair charges (see previous posts)

Barclaycard said they were passing the money on to their agents,

i have written and questioned them on this and await their reply.

 

 

The other is for PPI on the account.

 

 

So if Barclaycard sold the account to Cabot by Absolute Assignment should the unfair charges claim

and the PPI come to me or would Barclaycard send it to Cabot to reduce the debt?

It should come to me, shouldnt it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally offsets but in the case of the assignment should come direct to you.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Andy, just wanted to make sure. I

 

 

t looks like Barclaycard made a major cock-up with some of their departments unsure as to who owns what at the moment.

Its bad news for me if they admit Cabot own the account coz i would have liked to have killed them off once and for all.

 

 

On the other hand they would still have to prove in court that the CCA is compliant and the mix up with Barclaycard

would go in my favour i suppose and plus Cabot being Cabot have made more errors that a kid in kindergarten.

 

 

All together im looking at between £1,500 and £2,000 back from Barclaycard which will come in handy.

 

 

Wish i could have filmed myself getting that cheque this morning, it was fast forward, no stopping

and please dont let their be any speed cameras around,

 

 

i swear it was in my bank account within 10 minutes of me receiving it just incase they asked for it back.

Well worth the price of a stamp.

Will let everyone know what happens next.

 

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All,

got what is probably a stupid question but im interested to know someone elses thoughts on this.

 

Original Creditor sells debt with an outstanding balance of just say £3,800

DCA adds interest and chases the debt

Debtor gets refund of charges,ppi,etc for around £1800

 

Heres the question:

- Original balance should have been £2,000 when sold to DCA and not £3800

(albeit refund has been given to debtor so balance would stay at £3800 before interest from DCA)

 

 

but has anyone been to court and said to a judge

"thats what the balance should have been at at the time debt was sold,

i would have probably been able to manage a debt of that size before unfair charges

and mis-sold ppi was added and the DCA was sold an over inflated debt by the original creditor".

 

I know its a daft question and a court would probably not look at things the same way as i do but it kind of makes sense to me.

 

 

Any thoughts, anyone?

 

Legal aid is now through,

although i do have to pay something towards the cost so my lawyer is writing to Cabots lawyers to see if they want to proceed.

If they do and i win then ive told my lawyer i want Cabot to foot my legal aid bill.

If i lose, id have to pay the leeches and legal aid.

 

 

Of course, i have the added bonus of them being told im on legal aid which could put them off pursuing.

Either way, its crunch time, the sist is getting lifted.

No more cheques from Barclaycard today boo hoo!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why assignments should be out lawed and banned in theory the debt is the assignees now, as they have bought it, with warts and all

so the PPI should have been refunded from the assignee not assignor (assuming it all within the same agreement/debt) you cant have 2 contracts for the same debt

and one refunds on the original balance and the other litigates on the assignment value, can you????

 

Even if they did buy it for peanuts!!!!! Unless of course the OC still has a vested interest in the debt.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.

The law is an ass, as they say.

 

 

I told my lawyer about the letter from Barclaycard on the unfair charges,

so she wants to know as soon as i hear back from them.

 

 

Im feeling confident enough for the sist to be lifted so to Crapot Financial i say..."Bring it on"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Latest update from my lawyer.

 

 

She has written to Cabots lawyers telling them im on legal aid.

That their clients (cabot) were considering their position.

That i do not wish the action to be sisted indefinitely.

Im in receipt of Legal Aid and that any award of expenses against me can be reduced to nil.

 

 

We suggested previously that your clients may not wish to incur expenses of a Proof if their was a "problem" about their position.

On this basis please confirm if your clients intend proceeding any further with the Action.

 

Sounds pretty good to me,

especially when she says that any expenses can be reduced to nil if i lost (which i fingers crossed i wont).

She hasnt wasted any time since the Legal Aid Certificate has come through, so heres hoping folks.

Will let you all know as soon as i hear anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Delilahsabh,

I am having problems with crapbot also and looks like they are going to try and take me to court.

I am in Scotland also, and would like to get legal advise, your lawyer sounds pretty clued up, I have looked around for lawyers who deal with these issues, but havent found anyone.

I am in the South Lanarshire area--is you lawyer in or around this area?

If so, would it be possible for you to somehow let me know who it is so I can get in touch with them and take my problem to them for advise?

Hope this is ok.

Good luck against these muppets!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, firstly sorry im on the other side of Scotland so cant help you with my lawyer rightinthemire.

 

Secondly, i need help from all you lovely people out there.

 

 

I have just came off the dog and bone to Barclaycard.

Have not heard from them about the unfair charges yet so decided to phone them and see what they had to say.

They have apparently sent the "agents" the default charges to offset against the account.

I asked who the agents were and after 5 minutes of being on hold i was told Cabot.

 

 

I explained that Cabot were supposed to own the account and that they are not agents for Barclaycard

so therefore the money should have been returned to me.

 

 

I was told to phone Cabot and discuss it with them (erm! no chance).

What do i do now apart from tell me lawyer obviously?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again. I managed to speak to my lawyer about barclaycard giving Cabot the money, she wants it in writing (so do i).

Should i write to Barclaycard and tell them im not happy that they havent responded to my letter regarding "agent"

and again request confirmation that Cabot own the account.

 

 

Then put something like, if Cabot own the account why have Barclaycard sent the money to a third party,

it should have been sent direct to me.

 

 

If like they said they have given the money to Cabot then i want confirmation that this was applied to the account.

Its what ive already sent them but is there anything else i can add?

I appear to find myself in a win win situation here

 

 

Barclaycard dont seem to know if the account is sold or if Cabot are acting as their agents and if the latter is the case,

im going to have a field day with Cabot given half the chance.

Any advise anyone?

and what will they do with the PPI (id like that paid to me not Cabot)

 

i have drafted a letter for Barclayscard.

I have told them that i need clarification as to where and who the refund has been sent.

I have been informed that Cabot are owners of the account and that as such refund should have been direct to me

and not an independent Third Party (check with FOS on Refunds of PPI and Unfair Charges).

 

 

If Cabot are agents, then i need the balance due before the refund and after it was applied

and confirmation in writing that Cabot are acting as agents.

 

 

I have also referred to the letter for the double entry refund whereby it implies Cabot are owners

and there appears to be a breakdown in communication within Barclaycard regarding this account.

 

 

I have gone on to say that Cabot initiated court proceedings in May

and that all information received regarding refunds of unfair charges, double entries and ppi are being passed on to my lawyer

to be used if required (unsure about that bit it seems a bit strong).

 

 

Ive told them i expect a response within 14 days or i will pass this to the Financial Ombudsman

and instruct my lawyer to initiate court proceedings

 

Thats more or less what ive put in and im obviously calling their bluff with the "initiate court proceedings" bit

so does anyone think its a bit too strong and i havent told them that Cabot were taking me to court yet

but i put it in the letter to let them know i have a lawyer dealing with it (is that a right move or a wrong move?).

 

 

If anyone can advise if i should tone that down a bit id appreciate any input.

 

 

Im getting close to seeing an end to this

so im scared in case im too heavy handed and blow my chances of winning

but i just want Barclaycard to confirm that they are agents and not owners.

 

 

The money would be nice but i dont really care about it,

i just want cabot to disappear and id like to kick their ass in the process

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help required!!!

Barclaycard have refused my ppi claim stating that i ticked the box on the application form,

they neglected to state that my employment status was "homemaker".

I have also been on long term incapacity benefit since 1991.

So do i complain to Ombudsman and if so how do i go about it?

 

Here is the latest from Cabots lawyers:

 

We now have our clients instructions.

Our clients have in particular noted your client has been granted legal aid.

They are reasonably confident of success in the action against your client but, in view of the fact that this is a summary cause,

the fact that your client could have an award of expenses against her modified to nil does have some bearing on their approach to the matter.

 

Our clients are uncertain as to whether you are aware that your client has already offered to settle this matter

-we enclose a copy of a letter your client sent to our clients on 15 April 2008 in which an offer is made to settle at £70 per month.

( wrong date of letter for a start Cabot and the offer was at that time made under duress.

thats the few payments i made when they were harassing the life out of me).

 

In all the circumstances, and for the sake of a speedy settlement, our clients would be prepared to compromise the principle sum.

The sum currently sued for is £4,780.00 and our clients would be prepared to settle for one half of this figure, namely £2,390.00.

They would meet their own expenses and your client obviously has legal aid cover.

 

 

Our clients have noted your clients earlier proposal of £70.00 per month and in all the circumstances our clinet would be prepared to accept payment at that rate,

subject to your client vouching her current income to demonstrate that £70.00 per month is reasonable having regard to her current circumstances

. (DREAM ON CABOT YOU AINT GETTING TO KNOW MY INCOME).

We look forward to hearing from you when you have your clients further instructions.

 

My lawyer states that as they failed to respond to any of the points made by her and that they have simply indicated they are reasonably confident of success,

that i should refuse their offer.

 

 

There is also no mention of the £490 refund they have received from barclaycard for the default charges.

I havent instructed my lawyer yet, i thought id put it to the experts first to see what you guys think

 

 

. My own opinion is ive got their backs to the wall and theyre trying to get at least something out of me but Hell will freeze over 1st.

 

 

So 2 points here guys that i need advise and opinions on:

- the ppi and

the letter from Crackpots lawyers.

 

 

Please!!

 

I have now spoken to my lawyer and she is under the impression that its a last gasp attempt to get something out of me.

On that basis i have instructed her to refuse their offer and to state that there are currently disputed charges

that have supposed to have refunded by Barclaycard to their "agents" Cabot, yet they have not mentioned this or adjusted the balance in their letter

 

 

. I have told her to also state that i have passed a disputed ppi claim on the account to the financial ombudsman for their consideration

. (obviously, i havent done that yet because i dont know what to do)

 

Eureka! managed to find the Financial Ombudsman Complaint form so its been posted off today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3816 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...