Jump to content


Qick one-bailiff enforcement of a L/O commercial premises.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4801 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

More on this.

Seems a L/O was granted last August.

He maintains he has been making payments,which would appear to be the case since the L/O was for £3700

and the bailifs are demanding 3k now so looks like he has paid maybe 800 since then. Does he know how much he has paid?

The main lease is in the name of another company,and he is sub letting. Whose name is the LO in?

According to him,the agreement shows that all the fixtures and fittings in the club belong to the other company and not my friend.

The only assets belonging to him are the beer and spirit stock.

From my readings of these sorts of action with business rates arrears,it is usual for the bailiff to demand at least half of the warrant amount before agreeing to any repayment arrangement.

This usually also requires a wpo.

Given that he is not able to agree to any levy on the FFs since they are not his,what does he need to be doing ?

Will a Stat dec need to be done ? Whoever owns all the F&F needs to do a Stat Dec in order to prevent their removal.

He says he is wanting to have an arrangement in place,but is reluctant to call the number of the guy who left the notice,because it says full amount due immediate,and no arrangements can be made. If he has the A/C No he can always pay the Council direct using their website or automated phone line - he may have to budget for Bailiff fees incurred.

I have told him this is usual.

Any thoughts ?

 

Has he written off to the bailiffs for a breakdown of their charges. It is quite a common occurrence for Bailiffs to inflate fees for NNDR as most businesses are used to being ripped off for different things and very rarely question any fees so charged. The charges for NNDR are broadly similar to those of Council Tax. here's the usual sample for him to adapt to his own use, send initially by email followed up with a copy in the post:

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

 

He should also ring the Council and ask:

a - how many LO's are there

b - who is the named person/company - if not him they may refuse to give details

c - the date the LO was obtained

d - how much is still outstanding

e - when it was passed for enforcement.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

His biggest problem will be to prevent the Bailiff gaining access. Regardless of what is done temporarily he will seize and may even remove any goods he can until such time the Stat Dec is put in place - get him to treat this as urgent. When he has it he will need a few extra copies and should ASAP forward one to the Bailiff company via email + copy in post, send one to Council asking for it to be put on the file for reference and also some to hand for "callers", there may be chance it could be more that those seeking NNDR, depends on how "honest" those that sought receivership are. When he gets the details of fees back from the Bailiff ask him to post them here.

 

PT

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...