Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bristow & sutor notice of seizure of goods


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4766 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My daughter returned home today to find paperwork hanging out of her letter box, from Bristow & Sutor. It was not in an envelope and it is a 'Notice of Seizure of Goods'.

 

It is apparently for unpaid Council Tax / NNDR for which they are claiming over £5,000 they have apparently got a liability order and have marked down on a memorandum of amounts due 4 lots of CT/NNDR that are outstanding.

 

The problem however is that they have levied on a vehicle that had already been sold to someone else (both parties have a receipt) about 4 days before Bristow & Sutor came to the house. There was no prior warning, and no letter from the local authority.

 

The amounts owed are disputed with the council and was being dealt with before this visit. Bristow & Sutor have also added on 3 lots of levy fees.

 

Nothing has been signed by my daughter or her partner and the bailiff has not entered the property, my daughter who is severely disabled and on benefits is absolutely terrified because the car had already been sold and they were waiting for the buyer to collect and the other item on the levy is tools that her partner uses for work.

 

They have had no verbal or physical contact with the bailiff just this paperwork pushed through the door giving them 5 days to pay up.

 

A bailiff did call at their house last year, her partner was out at the time and when my daughter answered the door (she was on walking sticks) the bailiff physically pushed her out of the way to gain entry which caused her to fall over. Luckily, her dog stopped the bailiff from entering and a neighbour called the police.

 

She is an absolute mess at the moment and I hope someone could advise as to what she can do, as she cannot afford to pay such a sum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi dobiedogs

 

There seems to be several issues you could be addressing here; but I think you should definitely look into the Data protection implications of their action relating to the ‘Notice of Seizure of Goods' hanging out of the letter box, especially as it was not in an envelope.

 

I should verify whether or not this is a breach of the Data Protection Act – and if it contravenes The National Standards for Enforcement Agents requirements – in leaving paperwork of a sensitive nature in the way this bailiff has done; it could clearly go missing or be intercepted by someone passing by.

 

Data Protection Act 1998, references:

 

1) A breach of the seventh data protection principle in Part I of Schedule 1

 

2) Sensitive personal data under section 2 of the Act

 

3) Section 4(4) of the Act provides that, subject to section 27(1) of the Act, it is the duty of a data controller to comply with the data protection principles in relation to all personal data in respect of which it is a data controller.

 

The National Standards for Enforcement Agents require that “Enforcement agents should, so far as it is practical, avoid disclosing the purpose of their visit to anyone other than the debtor. Where the debtor is not seen, the relevant documents must be left at the address in a sealed envelope addressed to the debtor.”

 

You can make a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) but don’t expect a speedy response, if one at all.

Edited by outlawla
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

My daughter returned home today to find paperwork hanging out of her letter box, from Bristow & Sutor. It was not in an envelope and it is a 'Notice of Seizure of Goods'.

 

Bailiffs leave the NoS hanging iout the letterbox so they can tell if the occupier has returned home.

 

 

It is apparently for unpaid Council Tax / NNDR for which they are claiming over £5,000 they have apparently got a liability order and have marked down on a memorandum of amounts due 4 lots of CT/NNDR that are outstanding.

 

If you did not receive a Final Notice or a Reminder then the liability and fees are not lawfully valid. Contact the council and ask they comply with the law and roll the case back to pre-liability order stage. Contact the Local Government Ombudsman. If the debt is for a Ltd company and its ceased trading then the debt dies with the company.

 

The problem however is that they have levied on a vehicle that had already been sold to someone else (both parties have a receipt) about 4 days before Bristow & Sutor came to the house.

 

That is more the bailiffs problem than yours.

 

There was no prior warning, and no letter from the local authority.

 

See above.

 

The amounts owed are disputed with the council and was being dealt with before this visit. Bristow & Sutor have also added on 3 lots of levy fees.

 

I wouldnt worry about them. They are probably not lawful anyway. The law prescribing bailiffs fees for collecting unpaid business rates is Regulation 3© of the Non-Domestic Rating (Collection and Enforcement) (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provision) Regulations 1993 and The Council Tax and Non-Domestic Rating (Amendment) (England) Regulations 2006.

 

1st Visit £24.50

2nd Visit £18.00

 

The levy is not valid (no Final Notice/Reminder sent) so levy fee = £0.00

 

Nothing has been signed by my daughter or her partner and the bailiff has not entered the property, my daughter who is severely disabled and on benefits is absolutely terrified because the car had already been sold and they were waiting for the buyer to collect and the other item on the levy is tools that her partner uses for work.

 

Thats the bailiffs problem. Not yours.

 

They have had no verbal or physical contact with the bailiff just this paperwork pushed through the door giving them 5 days to pay up.

 

DO NOT contact the bailiff. NEVER open the door to one. Call police if you feel thratened but remember, that door remains LOCKED SHUT at all times. Speak to the council and get them to comply with the law. Start the council's Complaints procedure immediately on the grounds of 1) failure to comply with the law and 2) defrauding you with bogus bailiff (levy) fees contrary to Section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006.

 

A bailiff did call at their house last year, her partner was out at the time and when my daughter answered the door (she was on walking sticks) the bailiff physically pushed her out of the way to gain entry which caused her to fall over. Luckily, her dog stopped the bailiff from entering and a neighbour called the police.

 

Not relevent, I wouldnt worry about it. You should have contacted police and made a complaint under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 as this is Common Assault. Bailiffs are not allowed to commit violence against anyone let alone a vulnerable person.

Professional property investor and conveyancer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought Bailiff's were not allowed to visit on a Sunday?

 

For fear of sounding pedantic, post #1 of this thread was submitted at nine minutes past midnight so technically the content could refer to today 'Sunday', however, looking at the content of the post I should imagine that it took longer than nine minutes to compose; then it was more likely yesterday that dobiedogs was referring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the replies.

 

Yes it was Saturday when they called (I did write late at night) my fault so, sorry for that.

 

Fork-It - On the paperwork there is no charge for 1st / 2nd visit just levy fees. My daughter has had no letters / reminders / final notice at her current address. She has informed the council when she has changed addresses because this has been ongoing for a couple of years now. In fact the council already take money from her benefits towards one of the accounts that she still owes a small amount on.

 

She has spoke to the council and asked them to recall it back from the bailiffs but they say that they cannot do that. They know she is on benefits and that she is disabled, but they will not give her any information when she asked for it. They just say that she must deal with the bailiff.

 

The council in question is a real nightmare when you go there in person they treat you like you have committed some awful crime they also claim they haven't received forms or letters etc.My daughter thought she had finally got this sorted when the started taking money from her benefits.

 

I have told her partner to remove the vehicle that they have tried to levy on, the buyer is collecting it when he gets back from holiday.

 

Outlaw - thanks for the information about the DPA i've passed that on to my daughter and hopefully we will try that with the council.

 

Thank you again

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to add that the NNDR that is outstanding was for a business that was started and then ceased trading (not a ltd company) within a few months, L/A was informed but kept sending bills anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

My daughter returned home today to find paperwork hanging out of her letter box, from Bristow & Sutor. It was not in an envelope and it is a 'Notice of Seizure of Goods'. ... my daughter who is severely disabled and on benefits is absolutely terrified...

 

Hi dobie.

Please tell your daughter not to be terrified. If she is as you state then - I assume - she will be in receipt of DLA and other assorted benefits. This case should not be with the bailiff and should be taken back by the council. You / your daughter need to write to the bailiff company outlining her illness / disablity. Enclose evidence - doctors certificate, copies of relevant documentation regarding DLA etc. Copy this to the Head of Revenues at your local council. Send both by signed for. You can also email stating hard copy to follow. Google and quote from the National Standards for Enforcement Agents. Both your council and the bailiff company have agreed to abide by this...

[she clearly falls into the Vulnerable category]

Best wishes

Rae.

Edited by RaeUK
typoo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hopefully Kelcou is right (hello kelcou) and they will take this account back.

 

Whatever method of collection / enforcement they use, you will probably find that she does technically owe the rates for the period the lease was in force.

The task in hand would be to check if they can be reduced; i.e.was a discount available? was it applied for?; and / or appeal to their (ahem) better nature and ask about discretionary relief given the circumstances.

 

Did you have to see out the full term of the lease?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kelcou,

Thanks for that, Yes she is on DLA highest rate for both care and mobility, she is also under the adult social services as she is severely disabled.

 

Dobie, why am I not surprised? :roll: She clearly falls within the vulnerable category. Include, in your supporting evidence, info about social services. This should be an open and shut case. However, don't be surprised if the bailiff tries it on or the council have a memory lapse. You can also make an official complaint to the council CEO who has overall responsibility. I'm just easing myself back into CAG after a bit of a hiatus. If you need pointers regarding what to write or would like me to supply you with a letter I am happy to do so but not before tomorrow night. TBH I wouldn't even worry too much about the bailiffs gaining access and levying because they will ultimately fail. But that's just my view. I know this is a worrying time for your daughter but she is in a far stronger position then she currently realises.

Best wishes

Rae.

 

Hi Mr Pimpernel, it's been a while ... :oops:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greenpimpernel, yes she saw the full term out and there was no problem with that, the place was just left empty as the rent had been paid up for the year. She informed the council that she had closed the business and that it was empty but that didn't stop the council from sending her rate bills for 3 years after she had left the property!

 

Kelcou can you or anybody confirm that it is ok to write to the bailiff as you suggested because I have read on here that you shouldn't have any contact with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dobie, in your daughters circumstances this is the right course of action. How else can the bailiff be notified - in writing - and be provided proof of her condition? Most bailiff companies have people designated to handle these cases however, as you can imagine, they get inundated with requests and a percentage of which will be bogus. Hence providing medical evidence. The important thing is the paper trail and keeping copies of what you have sent. If the bailiff or the council play hard to get - and they've been known to - you are then simply gathering your ammunition for a Formal Complaint to the council CEO and on to your MP etc. Those who recall my posts and advice will know I have done this many times before for Caggers...

Best wishes

Rae

 

NOTE: You have several things to deal with rolled into one. I am only advising on the Council Tax ...

Edited by RaeUK
edit
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the link to the relevant page of the National Standards. How many boxes does your daughter tick?

 

here

 

Bristow & Sutor are accredited to the Enforcement Services Association whose Code of Conduct [section 2] states:

 

2. Members should comply with the provisions of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents.

 

No matter what the bailiff says on the door this is undeniable proof of what SHOULD be happening ... :razz:

 

Best wishes

Rae.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to look into the NNDR status for the period where the building was unoccupied / used yet the lease was in force and the rent paid; but THREE years?????

 

Are you saying they charged her for two years in addition to the year of the lease?

 

Yes they did, even though she had moved out and had proof that she had moved out. It took months for them to acknowledge that she wasn't there. Even then they still didn't get the dates right claiming she didn't move until November when she had moved at the start of September.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone,

 

kelcou - I looked at your link and my daughter ticks 3 of the boxes.

I have emailed B& S and have told them about her disability and that I was also putting copies in the post with the various medical reports and other evidence and kept copies of everything. I have also asked them to return the accounts back to the council as per their code of conduct on vunerable situations.

 

Next stop is the council, I have informed them that my daughter and her partner had not received any final notice/ reminders etc at her current address and have asked them to take the accounts back off the bailiff. They have flatly refused to do that with an added "I don't care whether she's [my daughter] on benefits or not this has got to be paid".

 

I have also asked for a copy of all the CT/NNDR demands for the period in question and date that the liability order was obtained. For some strange reason they wouldn't tell me this on the 'phone.

 

My daughter and her partner have now given me written consent to deal with this on their behalf as the council were very rude to my daughter when she gave them permission to deal with me today, so a complaint will be going in tomorrow.

 

Any ideas who is the best person to deal with re a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you everyone,

 

kelcou - I looked at your link and my daughter ticks 3 of the boxes.

I have emailed B& S and have told them about her disability and that I was also putting copies in the post with the various medical reports and other evidence and kept copies of everything. I have also asked them to return the accounts back to the council as per their code of conduct on vunerable situations.

 

Next stop is the council, I have informed them that my daughter and her partner had not received any final notice/ reminders etc at her current address and have asked them to take the accounts back off the bailiff. They have flatly refused to do that with an added "I don't care whether she's [my daughter] on benefits or not this has got to be paid".

 

I have also asked for a copy of all the CT/NNDR demands for the period in question and date that the liability order was obtained. For some strange reason they wouldn't tell me this on the 'phone.

 

My daughter and her partner have now given me written consent to deal with this on their behalf as the council were very rude to my daughter when she gave them permission to deal with me today, so a complaint will be going in tomorrow.

 

Any ideas who is the best person to deal with re a complaint.

 

The CEO, and Leader of the council, copied to her local councillor and MP point out that the Council is vicariously liable both joint and severally for the actions and any breaches, of legislation by their agents "The Bailiffs" as they would be for any employee, and also escalate to the Ombudsman, as if they have messed up and gained a Liability Order for monies not owed they are in the doo doo big time.

 

They are likely being evasive as to provide you with the information you require may well drop them right in it if they have charged for periods where she was not liable for what they are chasing.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of the problem you may be facing is that you may not actually be dealing with the Council. A lot of local authorities have "sold" their back office administration duties to private companies. This means that you may even be dealing with just a call centre when you ring. One of the more well known of these companies is called Capita who in turn own 2 Bailiff companies although B & S is not one of them. The only sure fire way of dealing with this is to go over the heads of those who have their snouts in the trough at the bottom - 9 times out of 10 they are reading from a script and are not allowed to deviate.

 

May be you should start with the Head of Revenues or alternatively if you file a Formal Complaint it should be marked as such and go to the Council CEO. Another way forward is to gain the help of the local Councillor(s) who do have access to those in charge, if they refuse or are reluctant go over their head to the Leader of the Council or his/her opposite number. If these avenues fail then you must complain to the LGO.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The best target for complaints would be the Head of Revenues (or equivalent title). When he gives you the brush off the next step will be the Chief exec, then the ombudsman.

 

How much evidence have you got that she moved out?

 

Does / would the ex-landlord confirm your story in writing?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...