Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Items for sale include five rare Ferraris and a pair of Air Jordan sneakers signed by Michael Jordan.View the full article
    • TECHZONE BUXTON LTD overview - Find and update company information - GOV.UK FIND-AND-UPDATE.COMPANY-INFORMATION.SERVICE.GOV.UK TECHZONE BUXTON LTD - Free company information from Companies House including registered office address, filing history, accounts, annual... thread title updated. dx
    • next time dont upload 19 single page pdfs use the sites listed on upload to merge them into one multipage pdf.. we aint got all day to download load single page files 2024-01-15 DBCLegal SAR.pdf
    • If you have not kept the original PCN you can always send an SAR to Excel and they have to send you all the info they have on you within a month. failure to do so can lead to you being able to sue them for their failure.......................................nice irony.
    • Thank you and well done  for posting up all those notices it must have have taken you ages.. The entrance sign is very helpful since the headline states                    FREE PARKING FOR CUSTOMERS ONLY in capitals with not time limit mentioned. Underneath and not in capitals they then give the actual times of parking which would not be possible to read when driving into the car park unless you actually stopped and read them. Very unlikely especially arriving at 5.30 pm with possibly other cars behind. On top of that the Notice goes on to say that the terms and conditions are inside the car park so the entrance sign cannot offer a contract it is merely an offer to treat. Inside the car park the signs are mostly too high up and the font size too small to be able to read much of their signs. DCBL have not shown a single sign that can be read on their SAR. Although as they show photographs which were taken the year after your alleged breach we do not know what the signs were when you were there. For instance the new signs showed the charge was then £100 whereas your PCN was for £85. Who knows, when you were there perhaps the time was for 3 hours. They were asked to produce  planning permission which would have been necessary for the ANPR cameras alone and didn't do so. Nor did they provide a copy of the contract-DCBL  "deeming them disproportionate or not relevant to the substantive issues in the dispute" How arrogant and untruthful is that? The contract and planning permission could be vital to having the claim thrown out. I can find no trace of planning permission for the signs nor the cameras on Tonbridge Council planning portal. and the contract of course is highly relevant since some contracts advise the parking rouges that they cannot take motorists to Court. I understand that Europarks are now running that car park which means that nexus didn't  last long before being thrown out.....................................
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ET Bundle – problems with bundle created by the respondent – Urgent Help needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4828 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I do have another thread for my ET case but I have created this one to try to catch the eye of anyone with ET and court bundle experience who may be able to help.

 

I am representing myself, and I feel confident enough to do so but need some advice. I didn’t want to have the expense and visits to a solicitor (I am disabled and house bound much of the time), however I know that I do need some advice on my witness statement etc so I am arranging to see one in the middle of the week, but in the meantime I wondered if anyone could help me with the bundle questions which I have?

 

As background to these questions - I requested a postponement to the court (via a written formal request) to change the day for exchanging list of docs, document bundle and witness statements as it was physically impossible for me to meet with the deadlines (imposed by the court order) due to my disability. This request to the court was refused by the judge.

 

I missed the date for exchange of documents, and received the ‘refusal to postpone’ response from the court 2 days prior to the order date for bundle creation. I spoke with a solicitor who advised that I should contact the respondent to request a short delay.

 

The respondent refused (with threat of a strike out if I didn't meet with the ordered date) but ‘allowed’ me to present my list of docs and copies of on the actual day ordered for the bundle creation.

 

I furnished them with the documents on the 'ordered' date for the bundle to be exchanged, since then:

 

1. They added new documents to their ‘list of documents’ on the date of ‘bundle creation’, after receiving my full document list and copies of docs.

They sent me the actual copy of their documents the day after the 'bundle date', which included new docuemnts not previously declared. i.e. they listed them to me after the 'bundle date' which of course means that these were added only after viewing my documents to be enclosed into the bundle.

 

2. They also removed documents from their list, which I intended to rely upon for evidence.

3. They have included a ‘without prejudice letter’ (from my solicitor appointed at the time - there was a compromise agreement situation which failed)

4. I have also realised I missed out some critical evidence from the bundle.

 

Questions:

 

1. In reference to the docs they have added docs without letting me know, would this put me in a good position to ask them to add documents to the bundle? My own and the copies they removed from their list? Really the question is - how do I get docs added to the bundle after the 'ordered bundle date'. I would like to have them added within the next few days, to ensure there is sufficient time to allow reference to them in the witness statements.

 

2. Can I insist the docs which are ‘without prejudiced’ are removed?

 

3. Should the respondent present me with a copy of the bundle, so that I am able to reference the relevant document numbers in my witness statement?

 

Any help however small would be really appreciated

 

thanks

MisTaken

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi '

 

Before I can answer your query i need to know the following:

 

How many documents are you talking about? Ie, the one`s that have been excluded and the ones that you need to rely on but are not included in the current bundle.

 

Remember all the documets that are to be relied upon have to be agreed by both parties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi '

 

Before I can answer your query i need to know the following:

 

How many documents are you talking about? Ie, the one`s that have been excluded and the ones that you need to rely on but are not included in the current bundle.

 

Remember all the documets that are to be relied upon have to be agreed by both parties.

 

Hi,

Of their own disclosure list, the respondent excluded 3, and added another 10 (previously undisclosed) and I would like the original 3 added back into the bundle and to add an additional 2 which I accidently omited (and failed to disclose as they were filed away in envelopes and I forgot about them due to time pressure of preparing bundle).

I hope this information helps.

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mis

 

Write to the Chairman of Tribunals and explain whats happened, explain what the Respondent has done and what you'd like included. If the Repondent is disputing the vaildity of any of the documents ask that they be included in the Bundle but in a different section. This souldn't be an issue. Give reasons for wanting them included.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mis

 

Write to the Chairman of Tribunals and explain whats happened, explain what the Respondent has done and what you'd like included. If the Repondent is disputing the vaildity of any of the documents ask that they be included in the Bundle but in a different section. This souldn't be an issue. Give reasons for wanting them included.

 

Hi,

 

Alternatively , if the respondents are being unreasonable then take 6 copies of each documents that you wish to be included in the bundle to the hearing, on the day of the hearing ,and explain to the judge why you wish the above mentioned documents to be included in the bundle,the Judge will not refuse your request of that i am sure.

 

Another way is to apply for a Case managemant discussion[CMD], this can be done by writing to the tribunal.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...