Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • HI DX Yes check it every month , after I reinstated the second DD I was checking every week. Also checked my bank statements and each payment has cleared. When responding to the court claim does it need to be in spefic terms ? Or laid out in a certain format? Or is it just a case of putting down in writing how I have expained it on CAG?
    • Come and engage with homelessness   Museum of Homelessness MUSEUMOFHOMELESSNESS.ORG The award-winning Museum of Homelessness (MoH) was founded in 2015 and is run by people with direct experience of homelessness. A very different approach. If you're in London you should go and see them
    • You have of course checked the car is now taxed and the £68 is stated against  the same reg?  If the tax for the same car did over lap, then I can't see you having an issue pleading not guilty Dx
    • The boundary wiill not be the yellow line.  Dx  
    • Afternoon all Looking for advice before I defend claim for car tax payment that the DVLA claim I owe £68 from an idemity claimback from my bank and unpaid tax  brief outline. Purchased car Jan 30th ,garage paid the tax for me after I gave them my card details  first payment £68 out in Feb 24  followed by payment of £31 from March due to end Jan 24 Checked one of my vehicle apps and about 7-10 days later car showing as untaxed? No reason why but it looks like DVLA cancelled it , this could be because I did not have the V5 and the gargae paid on my behalf but not sure did not receive a letter to say car was untaxed.  Fair enough I set up the tax again staight away in Feb 24  and first payment out Mar 31st , and each payment since has come out each month for £31 , this will end Feb/Mar 2025, slightly longer than the original tax set up, all good. I then claimed the £68 back from my bank as an indemity refund as obviously I had paid but DVLA had cancelled therefore it was a payment for nothing?  Last week recieved a SJP form dated 29th May stating that DVLA were claiming for unpaid tax and a false indemity claimback which of course is the £68. It also stated that I had received two previous letters offering me the oppotunity to pay that £68 but as I had not responded it was now a court claim that I must admit guilt for or defend. My post is held for weeks at a time from Royal Mail ( keepsafe) due to me receiving hospital tretament at weeks at a time that said I did not receive any previous letters from DVLA. I am happy to defend this and go to court but wondering what CAG members think? In summary I paid an initial amount of £68 and then a DD of £31 , tax cancelled  I set up a new DD at £31 a month all in the month of Feb 2024, I claimed the £68 back from my bank. DD has been coming out each month without issue and I have paperwork to show the breakdown for both DD setup's plus bank statements showing the payments coming out . The second DD set up has extended payments up to Feb/Mar 2025. DVLA claiming the £68 was ilegally claimed back despite the fact they cancelled the original DD for reasons unknown. Is this defendable ? I will post up documents including the original DD conformations 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO/RUTHERFORD claimform - barclaycard


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Did you read the first link.....you have to respond to the claim within 14 days of the date on the claim form, and you can either partically defend, defend all or admit it.....if you wish to defend then you get a futher 14 days in which to supply your defence. STICK TO THE TIMETABLES...and do spend some time reading around these forums....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Presume you have sent the CPR request to TR and acknowledged the Claim? Also SAR to BC?

 

Await 7 days for a response to the CPR then send a reminder.

 

You have 28 from 'Date of Service' which is 5 days after the date on the claim form (i.e 33 days from the date on the claim form) to enter a defence as long as you have acknowledged. The defence will depend on the info already received plus any response to the CPR request, we will help you with this.

  • Haha 1

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just received a e-mail from Barclay Directors office, confirming the date and who it was sold to and last payment made. Barclaycard sole this debt on 19 October 2007 to:

 

HFO Services

Highland House

165 The Broadway

Wimbledon

London

SW19 1NE

 

How does this effect my defence of claim, because on paperwork received from TR, it says BC sold to HFO cayman as first assignee not the address mentioned above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, HFO will simply claim Barclays are not telling the truth, and will produce a cod fax from some lowly Barclaycard employee stating it WAS sold to HFO Ireland (their usual mistake – not even to HFO Cayman).

 

There’s lots to defend against here, but I’d rather you did not show your hand too early. Best wait for their CPR response.

 

In the meantime, consider two elements alone.

 

1. HFO’s first contact with you is very recent (although they will claim differently in court papers), yet clearly they are claiming interest from the date of default. They cannot. They can only claim interest from when they informed you that they owned the account. That’s because until that point, you were not aware that HFO ‘owned’ the account and therefore had no opportunity to discharge the alleged debt.

 

2. By law they were obliged to send you a statement of account every year. I bet that hasn’t happened. I think on all these recent accounts where debtors have only just been informed of the change of ownership – three, four or five years after the event – that absolutely no annual statements of account have been sent out. That means they cannot claim interest.

 

These issues can form part of a defence.

 

You have to be aware that, in dealing with people who run their operation so inefficiently and badly, you have to expect absolutely any tactic to be used, so stay on your toes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right

 

Have you checked when the letter was signed for? Count 7 days from receipt plus a day and then send something along the lines of the letter I have drafed below. Send recorded and keep all copies. There is no point sending too earlier, you are being generous here which is in your favour.

 

Track and Trace

http://track.royalmail.com/portal/rm/trackresults?catId=22700601&pageId=trt_rmresultspage&keyname=ePOD4_track&_requestid=126033

Re: Combined CPR 31.12 and CPR 16.4(2) Request

I have not received your response to the above request, sent to you on (date) and received by you on (date). I would remind you of the following:

If you require more time in which to comply with this request you must tell me in writing. You must tell me before the time for compliance with this request has expired. In telling me you require more time you must tell me what steps you have taken and propose to take in order to comply with this request and also state a date by when you will comply with this request.

 

If you are unable to comply with that part of this request concerned with CPR 31/CPR 16 and believe that you will never be able to comply with this request you must tell me in writing.

 

Please note that if you should fail to comply with any part of this request or fail to request more time, I will make an application to the court for an order that the proceedings be struck out or stayed for non-compliance and a summary costs order,

Yours faithfully

 

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have given TR enought time, just preparing the reminder letter to be posted, Do I need to write to CC informing them where we are as of now. So Far..... SAR request to BC 14/3, CPR letter received TR 15/3, CC ankowlgement form sent 14/3. Reminder CPR request TR 24/3.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The reminder letter has been received by TR today by recorded post. Should I be expecting a letter from CC confirming receipt of returned form (posted 14/3) stating that I will defend this claim.

 

regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The reminder letter has been received by TR today by recorded post. Should I be expecting a letter from CC confirming receipt of returned form (posted 14/3) stating that I will defend this claim.

 

regards

 

No it is up to you to meet the deadline for submitting your defence.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can ring the CC and check that the ack has been received and also check the date by which the defence has to be submitted. If you can tell us the date, we can start helping you put a defence together.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

What exactly is included in the SAR? If you can give a briel description of the documents sent. Look for anything that indicates that the account was sold and to whom.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

In the SAR pack.........

 

All credit cards statements

30cm thick computer print out of data

Some 30 standard letters from BC asking for payment, one photocopied letter from mercers

At this moment in time I cannot locate any info that says sold to HFO

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is the computer print out that you need to sift through, unfortunately. The slae should be somewhere in there. Did they include any default notice or notice of assignment in the letters?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This is the only entry that I can find that mentions HFO

 

are there any entries which say ROX or Roxburghe?

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you have printouts for around the time the account was sold?

 

BC confirmed ac passed to HFO on 19/10/07, these are the entries I have in my SAR for around this time +/- 4/5 months

 

Collection status

 

20/07/07 cra no respond 28 days

20/07/07 working front end

23/08/07 working doorstep

14/09/07 clsd unsucc prime

16/09/07 agency-closure code

30/09/07 card expiry date

 

(ps) found entry saying payment due date; 21/03/2011, date last in order; 21/02/2011 and 21/02/2011: last billing date that the ac was deemed to be in order, ie. was not delinquent,,,??

 

27/04/07 effective date of cancellation

27/04/07 account status code ZZ = debt manager

31/12/07 indirect balance details number 75 closed

20/02/2011 last billing date, ??

 

 

Regs

Edited by MONGOOSE555
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I have followed all advice, SAR, ACK forms and CPR requests. I think the SAR is incomplete because it does not mention who,date and time when the acc was sold, it should have a entry saying this, should I call them or do something to say WTF is going on.

 

I have read the print out five times and there is one mention of HFO which I have posted a pdf, no mention of ROX etc. I only have a e-mail from BC directors office confirming when this ac was sold (who, what, why ,where info)

 

In addtion received cc statments of acc in SAR request and CC charges and interest was £1042.19, how do I get most if not of these charges back during this claim action. There is no sign of a CPR, reminder letter sent.

 

As of today I have seven working days to get a defense in, its now weds and if any query letters need to go out to TR,BC or whom ever then now is the time for reccomendations

 

regs

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 5 months later...

Hi Caggers

 

Does anyone have following information that they can upload for my ref.

 

2004 BC CreditCard TCs

2004 Credit agreement with perscribed terms

 

And the following after the 31/05/2005

2005 BC CreditCard TCs

2005 Credit agreement with perscribed terms

 

I have SARed BC for this 2004 info, but have not/will not supply this info under my DPA request

 

Regs

 

m

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...