Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4836 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello - I am a home owner, albeit a tiny one - tiny one being me and the house :o)

I am confused i just read a post where someone said they went bankrupt but kept their mortgage.

The only reason i am not going bankrupt becuase i dont want to lose my house.

Is it possible for me to go bankrupt and keep my property?

My house is worth (i think approx.) £175k, I owe £155k.

I have 2 secured loans on it totalling about £25k

I have around 20K of non secured debt (2 x loans, 2 x credit cards)

Is bankrupcy something i can do and keep my house?

thank you for any advice ..

much apreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

the answer is a little complicated

 

Basically when you go bankrupt the OR has 3 years to deal with the property. Now if it is in negative equity the OR wont do anything with it at the moment, they will simply wait. If by 2 years 3 months it still has no equity then they will start the process of giving you it back with no fees. If it does have equity by this point then they will ask you to buy them out. If you cant do that then if it is a small amount of equity then they may simply put a charge on the house and give it back to you if it has a lot of equity then they may consider selling the property

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you very much for your reply. I always thought that if i went bankrupt then i would lose the house instantly and any profit that was made on the sale would firstly go to the costs of the solicitors and then be shared between the loan comapnies with the second charge, so this is interesting i did not realise it worked like this. Sorry if this sounds stupid but what exactly does OR mean? Do you think that the OR would consider 20K a small equity?

So really its touch and go whether you would keep your house or not that would be the risk i would take, whether 3 years down the line they decided to take it or not?

thank you again...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think the OR would consider 20k equity very small. He or she would want that to help pay your creditors off. When they say small they mean small,,, I have read somewhere they usually don't want to mess with assets less that 1k,,, so I think Surrey your on a loser there. When you say secured loans on the house I take it you have counted that money into the property's worth.?????? ie. Sell house pay mortgage and Secured loans you are still left with £20,000. !!!

 

Could you not raise the £20,000 somewhere, it does seem that BR may not be your option here because you have an asset that would pay off the debt.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that if i went bankrupt then i would lose the house instantly and any profit that was made on the sale would firstly go to the costs of the solicitors and then be shared between the loan comapnies with the second charge, so this is interesting i did not realise it worked like this. Sorry if this sounds stupid but what exactly does OR mean? Do you think that the OR would consider 20K a small equity?

So really its touch and go whether you would keep your house or not that would be the risk i would take, whether 3 years down the line they decided to take it or not?

thank you again...

 

Technically, with two secured loans of £25k + a mortgagae of £155k you dont have ANY equity.

 

Why do you want to go Bankrupt ?. This will not erase secured loans.

 

OR means Official Receiver ( The Insolvency Service )

 

WEBSITE >>>>>HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically, with two secured loans of £25k + a mortgagae of £155k you dont have ANY equity.

 

Why do you want to go Bankrupt ?. This will not erase secured loans.

 

OR means Official Receiver ( The Insolvency Service )

 

 

thanks for all your replies and helpful info. The reason i am considering bankrupcy is becuase im struggling to meet my payment arrangements and now making arrangements on arrangements. I had a good job within our family biz of 20 years that paid me enough to more than meet my outgoings but since our biz went down the pan around 18 months ago i have been struggling ever since and sometimes it feels as though things are not getting any better. I realise that if i sold the property that the any equity would go to the secured lenders, and im not just trying to wipe them - i cant afford them due to the huge change in my income. I appreciate your info, at least i know now that if i go bankrupt i am still have to repay these secured loans. Please can i stress that i am not trying to run away from responsibilities i took out and loans I have taken out - i cant afford repayments this is the problem. God that means i have NO options!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry if i misled you. Of course your secured debts are included in your bankruptcy. What i meant was, just because you have gone bankrupt, that doesn't immediately release you from the debt. Your debts will be administered by the insolvency service until such a time as they see fit. This could be up to 3 years.

 

Have you tried re negotiating repayments with your creditors? They wont want you to go bankrupt.

 

I have a friend whos mortgage went from £800 ish PCM to £350 ish PCM because his work had taken a nosedive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dodgygeezer - oh i understgand what you mean - yes that makes sense, I dont think BR is a road im going to go down..

the 2 companies that i have the secured loans with - I have mentioend to them before about a lower settlement figure and they said in a roundabout way that they would just go for my house. In other words the full debt is repayable in full otherwise they will go for repossension or whatever it is they do to get their money back.

 

I have often thought that surely they would prefer to negotiate a figure that i can afford to repay rather than me go bankrupt and they get very little?

 

with my mortgage i am on an arrangement, i pay an extra £100 a month ontop of my normal monthly payment until the arrears are clear. How did your friend go about getting it reduced so much?

 

thanks for your help :o)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have to speak to them. Make them understand that you are at your wits end, and one very, very, small step away from bankruptcy.

They have a wealth of experience. Some will help unquestionably, some will rip the carpet from under your feet.

 

My friend went from capital repayment to interest only for an ongoing period. He keeps in constant contact, and is trying, but things just aren't getting any better.

 

On a personal level. I negotiated a 12 month repayment break with my mortgage co, and the money is put on to the end of the contract. You still have to pay it, and interest, but it gives you a bit of breathing space. I also re negotiated a reduced £350 PCM to £150 PCM with welcome finance, on my secured loan. As things happened, it wasn't enough, and i was made bankrupt anyway, but that's because the Inland Revenue got to the end of their push button procedure, and wouldn't listen on a human level. Serves them right, they ended up with nothing. So did i. I dont want you to make the decision without knowing the consequences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

just reading this , ex bankrupt, i was made bankrupt 206 all deps secured or not are included in bankrupcy i kept my house in 209 i made a consent agrrement with the trustee to buy my intrest back it was hard and risky , considering the markets over the last years they are in no big hurry to sell , considering its the trustee that make monies out o this skam, my advice is make sure you vet were you get advice take and get your house re valued as may find at present it will be at lot less than you think , one thing you seid you have sacured loans are they in joint names if so you cant treat them as joint and several, so you could not include in bankrupcy , but if not and you think could do a deal with the trustee and this could take years it did with me it depends on how determind you are to keep your house but it can be done i did

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that bake.

 

Yes it can be done if you are determined enough. I stayed in my house for 23 months after my BR. I was offered to buy out my interest for £1 but chose to walk away. I have no regrets yet, but would encourage anybody who wants to keep their house to at least try.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...