Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cl Lewis / Cohen Solicitors HASSLING AFTER CO obtained


jimbo45
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4814 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

What's up with these wretched people -- surely by now they must have had ZILLIONS of complaints against them -- nearly everybody knows what low lifes and scumbags infest this totally STINKING industry where they buy 5,000 GBP debts for around 25 - 50 GBP and then try and extort the original PLUS interest etc etc.

 

A colleague of mine got a final CO for around 4900 GBP via Cohen's / CL Finannce / Lewis who "purchased" the original debt.

 

A FEW DAYS after the final CO - the ink was barely dry on the Court CO Cohen's have written TWICE to my colleague with threatening letters saying

 

"Our records show you owe XXXX GBP to our client CL Finance. This is subject to a CCJ in XXXX County Court

 

Please pay up immediately or further action will be taken".

 

Now as far as I know after a CO has been issued all they can do is possibly try some scare mongering but the CO is just a charge on the property until it's sold.

 

No Court will force a sale of an asset worth around 300,000 GBP for a Credit Card debt of 5,000 GBP -- by any standards the sale is VASTLY disproportionate to the amount of debt outstanding so what on Earth are Cohens playing at -- they issued the CO in the first place so if they are Solicitors shouldn't they KNOW and FOLLOW the rules.

 

Hassling people for money is a "reportable" offence anyway.

 

Is there any action that can be taken against these scumbags like getting their licence to practice law revoked or something.

 

If they weren't so greedy in the first place in going for a CO they might have actually got some money but my colleague is now so angry with these "people" that he's just going to sit it out for as long as possible and possibly if he has to pay something make them a smallish Full and Final.

 

I think there really ought to be a MASSIVE petition against this evil industry where debts can be bought for PEANUTS and then the debt buyers can almost charge the debtor what they like and often get away with it.

 

If they BUY debts they should only be allowed IMO to make say 25% on it --still a nice profit.

 

It's probably too much to expect this whole EVIL industry to be shut down but their wings should be clipped a bit.

 

Incidentally the CO DID NOT provide for any interest to be added which is probably why the hasslement is occurring -- they realize they've got themselves into a bind.

 

Hopefully they are digging themselves ever deeper into a pit from which they will never get out of.

 

Anyway another one for the Lewis/CL Finance/Cohen fan club.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as I am aware and I admit not 100% sure, but the amount decided on the CCJ is what is to be repaid on a monthly basis, having a CO does not alter this fact, the CO is there to register an interest if the property is sold that is all, if the debtor sticks with the CCJ then they cannot force a sale.

 

I would report cohen to the SRA for intimidation, and also check with the court the exact process involved now, tell your friend to not stop paying the ccj has this could enable these leeches to go for a sale.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

The CO SUPERCEDES the CCJ as when the CO is discharged the CCJ is automatically nullified.

 

If this wasn't the case imagine the horror stories that would appear -- When you sold your property the CO is paid off but you could still be chased for the CCJ.

 

Thankfully this isn't the case.-- The CO CONVERTS the CCJ amount into a "Secured" debt - although for enforcement the creditor has to go back to court again and go through all sorts of hoops to get any further.

 

These days getting a CO is really a 100% waste of time for DCA's -- but what would they know.

 

For starters if you have any decent equity in the property a court won't force a sale since the amount realized could be totally disproportionate to the amount of debt for example selling a 250,000 GBP house to setlle a 4,000 GBP credit card bill is 100% totally out of order.

 

A CO also stops any interest on the CCJ stone dead -- you only have to pay the amount of the CO plus the Court costs (around 200 GBP) -- NO INTEREST is allowed on debts subject to CCA laws -- 99% of debts on this forum.

 

Greedy CCA's get their knickers in a twist with the whole CO process -- you can now bargain with them since you can say you aren't moving for 30 years (even if you want to move next week) by which time the debt will be worthless.

 

Offer them a Full and final of around 12 - 15% to start with -- they probably purchased your debt for between 2 and 5% anyway. Disgusting business.

 

Cheers

jimbo

Edited by jimbo45
Link to post
Share on other sites

these debt collectors' behave like flies' around a cow's arse.anyone on here lately cannot fail to notice the continual detriment to the consumer,and those that are supposed to oversee this industry stand back.it has more to do with uk plc then the interest of the person that has resulted in this wild west culture that has prevailed and has got worse and worse.

 

charging orders are, a method of not only securing the debt,knowing this encourages oppressive behaviour as what can be seen above and gives an unfair advantage over other creditors',debt should not be allowed to be sold hence its important to get the debt into dispute once this happens the bankruptcy route is then also quashed as well as the ability to sell on to other outfits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...