Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have never heard of any such law. Please post a link to what you have read online that explains this law. And please confirm whether you were ever married to or in a formal Civil Partnership with your Ex.
    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest Statutory Demand help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4596 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, apologies if this is covered somewhere else in the forum, I have been reading as much as I can but im getting bogged down in the right order to do things.

My husband has received a statutory demand for a £1436 debt to an aqua credit card. I have just spoken to him and asked him when was the last time he either made a payment or acknowledged the debt and he says about 2005 maybe a touch earlier, which makes it 6 years old. So should I send them firstly the statute barred letter or the request for the original agreement forms. Im not sure what the right course of action is, we are going to go to the local court and do the "set aside because its barred" thing but not sure which way to proceed with contacting Capquest.

 

Please could someone with better knowledge than me help me out.

many thanks for your time and im sure your sick of repeating yourself :)

 

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Any chance you can post up whats been sent.

Whats the background as regards previous communications prior to this ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yea like where is the ccj fhey need first?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think they need a CCJ to issue a Statutory Demand do they?

 

First thing to remember above all else is that you have 18 days to Act, keep that in mind above all else.

 

If you/your husband are absolutely sure that no payments/acknowledgements have been made for a clear period of 6 years then yes, Statute Barred.

 

There are 2 major lines of thought here, get the SB set aside on the grounds of it being SB - have you checked your credit files?

 

or, simply ignore, before finding CAG I did just that to a Crappy SD and never heard any further from them in over 2 years.

 

Come back with the requested info and there will be loads of advice to help you through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, many thanks for your time, My husband said he has not been in contact with capquest or aqua credit card since about 2005 maybe a touch earlier.

I do think he has had letters threatening baliffs and offering reduced payments etc, but he has ignored them all (not the best course of action I know)

 

I have scanned the letter but I cant get it to upload on here, it keeps saying failed.

 

The letter says Statutory Demand under section 268(1)(a) of the insolvency act 1986.

Debt for liquidation sum payable immediatley and it says "form 6.1" at the top dont know if thats any help.

 

It then has a warning saying its an important document and we have 18 days to set aside or 21 days to deal with this demand.

 

It has an electronic signature of Barry Davies on it and has Capquests address as the creditor.

 

The next page says the debt related to an unpaid balance on an aqua credit card, the agreement terminated upon the failure of my husband to comply with the terms of the agreement and/or a statutory notice of default served by aqua credit card.

 

The rights and duties of aqua credit card passed to the creditor pursuant to an assignment dated 26 jul10. The total amount due at the date of this demand is £1435.72 which includes interest of £81.24 which has accrued since the assignment of the debt.

 

It then has PART A.

which says about the appropriate court for setting aside the demand.

Rule 6.4 (2) of the insolvance rules 1985 states that the appropriate court if the court to which you would have to present your own bankruptcy petition in accordnance with rule 6.40 (1) and 6.40 (2). In accordance with those rules on present information the appropriate court is NOW THIS BIT IS BLANK AND IT DOESNT MENTION A COURT NAME.

any application by you to set aside this demand should be made to that court.

 

Then PART B

details about Barry Davies and capquests address and phone number

 

Then PART C

Original creditor AQUA CREDIT CARD

Assignees Capquest Limited

date of assignment 26 Jul 10

 

Then the last page says how to complet with a statutory demand or have it set aside (act within 18 days)

 

Is this enough info, sorry I couldnt get the scanned copy to work.

 

thanks again

Paula

 

 

thanks again for any help

Link to post
Share on other sites

on yea i got my alphabet wrong..its an CO they cant get before a CCJ

 

dx

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Usual stuff then.

 

Still not sure which route the more knowledgable caggers' would recomend, my own inclination would be to get off - today - a Statute Barred letter and see if they have any information which they will use to prove otherwise, you could give them 7 days, others may dissagree and have other info to offer, so hang fire for a while though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have had two sd's from this filth, both were for sb debts, i did what harrassed senior did and ignored them.how was it served? and take a good look and see where is says particulars of debt,the rights ans duites of xxx passed to creditors pursuant to an assignment dated mine they conveniently left the date off, this is the give away if they have not put a date in, you have to becareful not to open a can of worms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An assignment is the legal process of selling the account so the new owner would have rights to all title.

Capquest have shown continually as can be seen in these forums,their blatant disregards to consumer regs and codes of practice.

Its time that the OFT did something about these.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As evidence of CapQuest’s commitment to best practices, we have achieved several industry-recognised quality standards. CapQuest’s quality standard benchmarks include:

  • Consumer Credit Licence
  • Member of the Credit Services Association
  • Charter Member of the CSA’s Debt Buyers and Sellers Group
  • Financial Services Authority authorisations to administer regulated mortgages and assist in the administration of insurance.
  • Quality Certificate (ISO9001: 2000
  • Registered Data Controller under the Data Protection Act 1998
  • Registered Data User with the Data Protection Office
  • Member of CAIS (Experian), Insight (Equifax) and Share (Call Credit)
  • Federation Against Software Theft (‘FAST’)—Gold Level.

CapQuest applies practices and procedures consistent with the ISO17799 quality standard for the management of data and IT security.

 

 

Its also about time they were taken to task for failing to uphold CSA and DBSG codes of practice

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin sums up this filth Paula, i was 100% certain that my 2 debts were sb and as such decided that i was going to ignore the sd's, i know that some will say that it is no a good idea to do so but i did not want to get into any dialogue with them and as i had ignored them and such like for 8 years i felt that was the best way to carry on as i did not want them to some way try to get the clock running again knowing how this lot are.

10. Does a statutory demand expire?

There is no expiry period for a statutory

demand. However, under the Limitation Act

1980, a debt must not be more than 6 years

old or based on a default judgment more

than 6 years old. This period can start to run

again from any date the debtor agrees the

debt exists and may be extended more than

once

 

They never employ a process server for service which shows they are just trying to flush you out, they would have to prove service if they moved to present a bankruptcy pettion.

have a read through these.

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/guidanceleafletspdf/statdemand.pdf

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/consumer_credit/oft664.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for all the help so far, but we have some more info.

 

I told my husband to get his credit file from experien so we could be sure of the dates and he has completely mixed up this one with another debt (another story) The date on the file that it says it defaulted was 24 April 2009 so this is not an old debt as we thought.

 

Are we basically screwed, should he try and offer to pay it in installments or is there anything we can do at this stage, can we send them the letter asking for proof they own the debt, im just not sure what to do now.

 

Im so sorry for messing you around, we should have got the credit file first.

Paula

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, back to the beginning, do you recognise this debt, how old is it (when was it taken out): what is a rounded up approx, figure of the amount outstanding. Much of what has been said above is still valid.

 

What is the date you have to comply by, ie, 18 days from 'alleged' receipt. Being lazy and not reading back, how was this delivered? As long as it was 'normal' unsigned for royal mail, then of course there is no proof you even received it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK this has been playing on my mind and its now 1.19am and I cant flipping sleep worrying about it.

The dates ive given a few posts above from the Experian report say the debt is Capquest, it doesnt mention Aqua Credit Card who the original debt was with, so when it says the "date started" is this when the debt started with Aqua or with Capquest as this could be why hubby got messed up with the dates. We dont think its statute barred but just dont know how to proceed with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok lets cross 'i's and dot 't's here for you...........

 

the dca will show as the named creditor now as they have obv broughtthe debt.

 

now , in a way, forget the defaulted date

that means nowt.

 

when was you hubby's last financial transaction In/OUT?

 

that will be from when the SB will start ticking.

 

if you dont know

 

then its time for an sar to the OC not capquest.

 

if you honestly DON'T know what the hell this debt is or have doubts

then CCA capquest.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i'll give you a 2nd little tip

 

barry davies DOES NOT EXIST

 

so hence the SD is NULL AND VOID

 

what i would suggest you do is use our advanced search top right

 

type in barry davies

and do some reading!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK...firstly try and relax as best as you can. It would of course be good to know when you last made a payment towards this alleged debt. But I would advise firstly to apply to set this aside. The fact they have not put your nearest court name on the documents would consititue an abuse of process. Take a look here and you will find out about the process, what to do and other successful cases. But if you aren't sure then please do ask... - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?287987-help-with-a-statutory-demand&p=3237562#post3237562 you will also find lots of other threads in here too - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/forumdisplay.php?190-DCA-Legal-Successes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...