Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you intend to revise this thread's title assuming Labour win the general election?  
    • quite usual for couriers to swap parcel contents, though it could have been done by someone at the 1st address before it got to where it should have .... ebay. just to clarify as you seem to be not understanding/reading some posts correctly.   you should always ignore a dca totally unless you ever get a letter of claim in the post. you never ever ring a DCA.. they LIE. no!! no!! they dont own the debt, their txt says our client ebay. only the OWNER of a debt can take you to court. and ebay dont do court. i find it quite amazing that you have numerous threads about ebay/paypal regarding issues since you joined in 2011 but have never read any of the advice previously given. dx    
    • so where are the one with this HMTL link? and when were they sent.? pdf's merged and properly named. dx  
    • Hi Just had a wee look at your PDF and nothing really to add. Now as for the Court Fees if these are in there Claim then that is for the Judge to decide whether they accept the recovery of Court Fees in the Claim. If recovery of Court Fees are not in the Claim and they try to recover these via your deposit then you dispute this with the Tenancy deposit scheme your deposit is protected in and point out these costs should have been in there Court Claim which they failed to do and is there error.  
    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advice on car repair - Garage not able to complete job


sheik_yerbouti
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4846 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I wondered if anyone would be able to advise on a situation with my Saab 9-3.

 

3 weeks ago today the electronic steering lock decided to stick on and not come off when the key was inserted (common fault apparently). I called the AA who advised that it needed towing to a garage of my choice. I went on to the saab forums and found a specialist in my area. I called them and they told me to take it in for looking at.

 

This was 3 weeks ago, so as you can imagine things have not gone too smoothly! After 2 working days the garage advised that they would have to send the car to Saab for diagnosing as they did not have the correct computer to link my car up to - this story then changed when they found out that saab wanted £150 for this task - the garage advised me that they were going to "upgrade their diagnostic system" instead to save on the costs.

 

On the Thursday on the first week I was informed that they had diagnosed the fault and the Electronic steering lock was indeed faulty - at a cost of £300 + vat, with a further £100 for diagnosis and fitting (this was a verbal quote). I said that this was fine as I had bought a warranty from warranty direct. Warranty direct have since advised that this part is not covered under the warranty. ( I'm disputing this decision but that is a different story.)

 

The part needed to come from Saab in Sweden which meant a wait of just over a week for delivery. The part was fitted the day after it arrived (which was now a week and a day ago).

 

I was informed that the car would be ready on the saturday morning but when I turned up, it was still in bits. Annoying but these things happen. The lock was engaged which meant it was very difficult to remove. I called again on the Monday to be told it still wasn't ready.

 

I called on the Tuesday and was informed that "they were awaiting a code reader to sync the new part to the car".

 

Wednesday arrived and the garage informed me that they had got a guy in (an auto electrician) who was working on the problem. It turns out that the software he had needed updating and he could not get it until the next day.

 

Thursday afternoon arrives and the guy has not turned up - apparently he did turn up and stayed until 7pm trying to sync the part to the car with no success.

 

Friday I am told that the auto electrician has arranged a low loader to take the car to his workshop to get sorted out, as the part is still showing as "alien" to the car and is being rejected.

 

Called today and teh car is still at the auto electricians. "Call back Monday" I am told!!!!

 

 

Sorry for the long story, but best to get all the facts up in print.

 

 

Anyway, I am quite worried about the following :

 

 

  • That the garage has replaced the wrong part (or ordered an incorrect replacement part - there are around 4 different part codes listed for this lock). If he didn't have the correct diagnosis equipment in the first place then how did he diagnose the fault?
  • That the car will still not end up being fixed, and they will start to swap other more expensive parts of the ignition system.
  • The cost of the repair - since the original verbal quotation an auto electrician has been involved, the car has been moved and I must be incurring further costs without being told.

Could someone advise on what my course of action should be from here? If the garage cannot fix the car (it is undriveable) does the law state that I still have to pay them?

 

I'm rather worried about this one - I feel trapped and the garage don't seem to have the knowledge to remedy the problem - although i've been polite and patient with them (They have been a saab specialist for 25 years, but it seems they deal in older saabs - they have also been amiable, although i'm sure that will change in the next few days!)

 

 

many thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they dont fix the problem; dont pay them a penny.

Have they given you a lone car while all this is going on?

Speak to SAAB customer services or technical dept and get their take or advise on the problem.

refer the garage to SAAB once you have their advice.

If they do subsequently solve the problem, dont pay for them learning their job or how to do it, thats down to them?

Again SAAB will have standard time for this job, say Two hours plus parts and thats all you should pay; and if feel brave ask them to reduce for the inconveience.

If they are an approved agent you can get SAAB to advise again as to whats fair.

Again if they refuse to compromise and you have to pay a huge bill to get your car back; write on the invoice that you pay that it is paid under duress and briefly state that you do agree with the amount.

Follow this up with a letter requesting they reconsider and state your full reasons and that you will consider taking them to court if you cant reach some sort of agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...