Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
    • Received a call and follow on confirmation email from the police about my cabinets! They wanted to confirm that I was prepared to support police action for the matter and that I would be happy to provide a statement and attend court at a later date!!! I think that something might actually get done - it won't get my cabinets back I know that but hopefully it will put a stop to this so called courier doing this to people!
    • Around a month ago I had to send a sympathy card to a friend in GB. Logistically it made sense to buy a personalised one on eBay and get it sent straight to my mate, rather than faffing around getting it sent to me.  This mighty purchase set me back all of £3.05 (including postage costs). I was taken aback that, when it was sent, I got a tracking number.  For a flippin' three-quid card!  I had no idea that technology had moved on so much and that tracking was so easy.  The shop has feedback for 16,300 purchases so tracking must be easy & automatic. It's unlikely your case will get to court, but in cases that do this got me thinking that we need to aggressively challenge the PPCs where they have lied about the timescales of sending their rubbish and have no proof at all of posting - when it would be so easy to provide it.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Deafness and DLA


cbbc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4833 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Has any one ever managed to be awarded DLA for being partially, severely but not completely deaf.

The award was turned down on grounds that my friend could walk and did not need help to cook or bath etc (even though through other problems he does) but completely ignored all the evidence provided form the doctor about his hearing.

There was no mention at all.

He has joint problems and was awarded the highest level for 2 years last time but this time he has the added problem of deafness which has been proved by the hospital and he has 2 hearing aids. They don't work for him. There are certain tones he is completely deaf to.

This time he has been turned down and awarded NOTHING at all.

Can there be an award for needing help due to deafness?

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Cbbc,

 

I'm not sure about the deafness but I know with DLA you have the right to appeal. My OH had to go to tribunal because among other things his doctor was completely ignored (we won).

 

I think your friend has a month after the decision to appeal, and then perhaps if he is turned down again, continue to tribunal - we had legal aid help us (if legal aid and/or the CAB are still going).

 

Has your friend got any assistance from Social Services? They can help with DLA forms.

 

Or maybe one of these orgs can help:

 

British Deaf Association

 

Royal Association for Deaf People

 

RNID

 

It's a sad fact of life that many people who need this assistance are being knocked back because of cuts, benefit cheats, etc. It sometimes takes several tries - we had a friend who was a quadriplegic and he still had to fill out forms every three years.... like the DWP knew something he didn't!

 

Good luck,

kind regards

H.x

That the birds of worry and care fly above your head, this you cannot change. But that they build nests in your hair, this you can prevent. --- Chinese proverb

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi cbbc,

 

My partner is Deaf and was awarded DLA at the lower rate indefinitely, we did have to go to Tribunal though, but it can be done. I suggest you gather enough evidence (hearing tests, medical history, doctors letters etc) and use them to your advantage. Unfortunately, the Deaf community shot themselves in the foot by saying they didn't want Deafness classed as a disibility, hence why so many people have problems trying to claim DLA. I also advise going to the CAB or seeing someone who knows about welfare rights. Does he know sign language?

Be good to yourself, when nobody else will

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for the answers.

You are right, there was a man on 'saints and scroungers' the tv programme the other day who was turned down even though he had terminal cancer.

The DWP said that he had been turned down because of an error filling in the paper work but I think they turn every one down first time regardless and hope you will go away.

Does it take as along to get to tribunal as the ESA appeals do?

As for my friend, he doesn't do sign language, he just needs help in certain situations. He would not hear a smoke alarm or telephone and can't hear people on the phone.

We have to shout at him and he uses ear phones for the television which leaves him isolated.

The DWP have said although they agree he could be in danger, he doesn't need help all day and night.

The thing is now though, with osteoarthritis etc is that the G.Ps dont want to send you for scans and x rays because it costs too much. It took me two years to get am MRI and its a lot harder still now.

As they have already said that non urgent operations which would include arthroscopies to check out your joints are not going to be given then we will have no evidence to prove our pain and disabilities and they wont just take our word for it.

The save money all round really.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The length of time it takes to go to Tribunal might be different where you are, I know it took us a year to get to Tribunal up here in Newcastle. I would advise your friend gets a hearing test done at the Hospital, if it has an ENT (Ear, Nose, Throat) Department. The DWP do have a habit of turning people down at the first time of asking, a friend of ours who is deaf and also paralysed from the waist down was refused 3 times before she won. It's the same with ESA claimants having to do a medical with ATOS, ATOS will lie through their back teeth and reject it then it goes to Tribunal, the whole thing is a disgrace.

Be good to yourself, when nobody else will

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps because I've sat through the same tribunal when my partner got turned down and know from experience. The Tribunal Services does actually bother to read the evidence and therefore it's best to be prepared.

Be good to yourself, when nobody else will

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does being deaf mean he has care and /or mobility needs? That is what they care about. It doesn't matter how many tests he's had done stating that he's deaf.

 

Being deaf brings a lot of problems.

If a person cannot hear people talking, traffic, alarms or telephones then every day help is needed.

Of course he needs proof that he is deaf.

The mobility is something else. I did not say he needed help with mobility for his hearing.

What point are you making?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Being deaf brings a lot of problems.

If a person cannot hear people talking, traffic, alarms or telephones then every day help is needed.

Of course he needs proof that he is deaf.

The mobility is something else. I did not say he needed help with mobility for his hearing.

What point are you making?

 

That DLA is based on needs and not the condition itself. There are aids that vibrate that he can use instead of alarms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It depends on his other disabilities. being deaf itself does not give the right to dla. There are a lot of deaf people working and living normal lives I think is what the poster was getting at. If his disabilities as a whole affect his care needs then he can appeal and go to tribunal.

 

There are so many inventions nowadays to improve a deaf persons life, they are interested in care needs as help with bathing, can he cook a meal himself, can he walk unaided etc...

 

But no harm in appealing it is his right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That DLA is based on needs and not the condition itself. There are aids that vibrate that he can use instead of alarms.[/QUO

Are you deaf? Is deafness your disability?

Do you have expert advise to offer or just an opinion?

Do you think that deaf people should not qualify?

If you do mean that, then just say it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont think he meant to offend nor I for that matter, but a condition does not give the right to dla, I know i have a condition and get dla high rate care low rate mobility, it is the extent that it affects his needs. Every case is judged on its own merits and care/mobility needs.

 

Also more so lately with the changes putting pressure on those disabled to work who cant possibly and being labelled feckless etc......there are cases where it appears you have to be dead to claim esa and once denied you inturn tend to loose dla..Everyone genuinely needing help needs to appeal and go to tribunal it is our right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...