Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
    • Dave, You're probably thinking along the same lines as me. The NTK says "The reason for issuing the charge notice is: Parking longer than allowed" From memory, I think one of their stupid rules is that if 'Bucks is closed, you're not allowed to park at all.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

'Feet On Seat' offence with MerseyRail in Liverpool


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4859 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im a final year student studying in Liverpool. This morning I was using the MerseyRail service and did something utterly and completely regretful and stupid that’s been bugging me all day. In an empty carriage I put my foot up on the seat - something which I always do subconsciously without thinking about on trains and buses (but after today will not think twice about it again!)

 

Anyway - I was approached by 2 'MerseyRail enforcement officers' who took my name, address, description of what I looked like and read me my rights 'you have the right to remain silent, anything you do say may be given in evidence'. The entire process lasted a good 10 minutes and said i'll be receiving a letter from MerseyRail in the post in 4-8 weeks and could be prosecuted for it.

 

Im training to be a teacher and im going back to America to complete my second summer working at Camp America with children, ive planned a year out in Australia for September 2011 and ive also got a fieldtrip coming up in China within the next 2 months - a LOT of reasons to be genuinely worried about what has happened today.

 

Stupidly, I gave him a name very similar to mine E.G Edwardo Kelly instead of Edward Kelly with my correct surname. Then I have him a proper address and postcode for a house in Ireland (but not my address or postcode). I know providing false information is a criminal offence - but at the time I was 's**ting' myself... all that I could think about was criminal record, criminal record, criminal record = not being a teacher = not going back to Camp America = not going to China = not going to Australia = a large part of my life GONE INTO SMOKE. Part of me knew that these guys were not police officers and I didnt trust them with giving them my details anyway!

 

I know the normal procedure for this 'feet on seat' offence is to issue the offender a £50 fine via post. But what will happen if that letter doesn’t get to my address or be under my correct full name? What happens if they then issue further court summons which i don’t ever receive? Ive got no idea about the entire system - and although i’ve done a stupid thing today out of the ordinary I still cant believe this is happening right now. Ive got tons of university work, teaching paths and travel plans to concentrate on - and who would have thought a simple ride on a train by myself today would have come to all this.

 

Should I get in contact with MerseyRail to give them my full correct details? I really don’t know what position im now in and to say its worrying me is an understatement.

 

Passengers that have a habit of resting a foot on the seat – BE WARNED. I’ve certainly learnt the lesson.

Edited by irish1990
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no direct experience with 'Mersey Rail' but:

 

This isn't in the 'Ned Kelly' league of offences. I honestly don't know if they will write to the Irish address. Was it Northern Ireland or the Republic? I expect that they will use one of the various 'tracking systemes' and stand a reasonable chance of working out who you are.

 

Some folk will suggest that you wait and see 'what happens'. Mersey rail may give up when they get post back from the address that you have given. Or they might not.

 

For peace of mind, I suggest that you take the initiative, contact them, tell them how silly you have been, and offer to pay them a reasonable contribution.

 

By 'drawing the sting', I suspect that they will be minded to accept your money.

Edited by Wriggler7
grammar
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Grievance_P

Hide and Hide well, Merseyrail WILL contact the house number that you gave and the person or persons living there WILL give you up.

 

Lying ontop of an offence is not a good way to go

 

Do you know why Irish trains are so clean?...... cause there all over here putting their feet up on ours.:-)

 

I actually agree with Wriggler 7 give yourself up and face up to your crimes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRPO - In the event of having give the 'enforcement officers' a fake name and address would you suggest I own up to it?

 

A. Go to MerseyTravel HQ tomorrow (its across the street from where I live)

B. Write them a letter

 

It was an initial panic at the time, I shouldnt have gave them fake information though.

 

There is a 120-year-old bye-law which makes it a criminal offence "to interfere with the comfort or convenience" of fellow passengers which is what (if any) they will try to charge me on. I know it was wrong to put my foot on the seat - but the carriage was empty with no other passengers and it definitely wasn't interfering with the comfort or convenience of ANYBODY with my clean shoes. Ive also read that a spokesperson has stated to the media ""Passengers are informed whenever our security teams are on board their train, and if they choose to continue to behave in an unacceptable manner they will be dealt with accordingly." There was no announcement or warning today on the train. Just an empty carriage with me in it!

 

Just want to get back to enjoying life and forgetting about all this unbelievable nonsense

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you do not get into debates about whether your shoes were clean. Seats are for backsides, in trousers, skirts or kilts. Feet stay on the floor.

 

From your first post, you suggest that you may have given sufficient detail that Mersey Rail might be able to work out who you are. If they have to do the work, they will not want to know about 'out of court settlements'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SRPO Its Northern Ireland (which doesnt help I guess!)

Wriggler7 Do you mind if I ask what you mean by that?

 

Thanks for the advice guys, driving me up the wall at the moment :|

 

Really thinking of just calling into the MerseyTravel HQ tomorrow and asking to change my address to my student accommodation address?

 

I can explain that I dont want my parents seeing any letter... That way they might not be able to catch on that I have provided them a false address?

 

The guys were highly intimidating and I wouldn't trust them for the life of me - it was just an out of the ordinary reaction to give them false information, I couldn't honestly believe what was happening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really dont mean to be a pain in the ass, but if I were to go down tomorrow and 'change' my address with them they would HAVE to acknowledge it and update any records they hold of me.

 

Data Protection Act 1998

 

1) Data may only be used for the specific purposes for which it was collected (so if I was told by the MerseyTravel rail officer that I "would be receiving a warning and nothing would come of it" - if given a fine in the post he mis leaded me into making me give him the information which is against the data protection act)

 

2) Personal information may be kept for no longer than is necessary and must be kept up to date (so if I were to get in contact with them to change my address to my correct address they would have to acknowledge this)

 

3) Subjects have the right to have factually incorrect information corrected (see above!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said previously, I know nothing about Mersey Rail, but, I guess that there are more than a few NI resident people staying there. It may be that they 'give up', or it may be that they don't.

 

The suggestion to 'ignore' matters like this is a gamble, and whilst I am entitled to gamble at my own risk, I think it is wrong to suggest that another person gambles at their risk.

 

To 'deal' with this matter and bring it to a conclusion, so that it can be put behind the OP, I feel that the suggestion to visit 'Mersey Rail HQ', correct the postal address and face whatever consequences follow, is sound.

 

It can bring the matter back to a simple situation, no doubt some form of financial penalty, which to a student will probably seem expensive, but in reality will be similar to a speed camera penalty without the points.

 

To my mind, the risk of doing nothing is that Mersey Rail will write to the NI address, and might get a response, after which they might work out a 'proper' address and choose to prosecute a 'false name and address' case as well as a 'feet on seat' issue.

 

Lots of mights and maybes in this, but from the original post, the 'desire' seems to be to close this matter off, rather than have it hanging over the poster.

 

It is possible that if the folk at the address in NI ignore all letters, a prosecution, and a proof in absence could follow, and the first that the poster might know of it could be when a Court try to collect on fines.

 

I am uncertain whether an English Court can order bailiffs in NI to seek to collect, not something that I have ever had to consider as a south Essex man, my only contact with an issue like this was a lot of years ago, for a dissimilar offence, where a chap arrived from Eire at Hollyhead and had his collar felt on 'entry' into the UK.

 

It is a shame that no 'experts' from Liverpool have joined in this thread, they might have some insights that us southerners have missed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The link makes interesting reading, but I wonder if the 'report' misses the points.

 

The Magistrates were looking at a bright and no doubt well turned out 'defendant', charged with 'one' minor offence. They have not indicated that they will not deal with the many hundreds of similar offences, and I am sure that they will look at each case on it's own merit.

 

There is a simple mistake of fact in the article, the report states that Mersey rail are the only company to prosecute this offence. That is simply not true, I have watched one myself at Basildon Magistrates Court. Whereas I have not seen or heard the evidence of this 'Mersey' case, the evidence presented at Basildon was compelling, the Inspector asked the passenger three times to take his feet off the seat, and only submitted the report after the third instance. What I heard seemed very reasonable, and the Bench took quite a harsh view of the behaviour, fining £95.00. I have reason to remember the case, the defendant was a son of a person known to me, and not as a 'client'.

 

In the article, the local Council made a comment, and the general mood of the comments seem to support Mersey Rail in their action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...