Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Blame Apple for completely changing how macOS apps needed to be written and verified overnight with Catalina.
    • Oh yeah... So there is. ..    Hopefully it won't try to upgrade 😂😂
    • There's the ability to download origin for macOS Mojave and older right on the EA Website. www.ea.com/origin-for-mac      
    • Hello All, I was hoping for some help with a  Claim Form received yesterday 15h May 2024.  I have read lots of threads but I just want to check what I am doing. I have acknowledged service noting my intention to defend all of the claim and I have left the contest jurisdiction un-checked. I will today/tomorrow issue a CCA request with a £1 postal order to the claimant and a CPR 31:14 to the solicitor.  For the CCA which section should I use? I am not sure which section Paypal Credit would come under. If the claim was issued on the 9th May am I correct with my defence filing date of the 11th June? Is there anything else I need to do? Thanks in advance   Which Court have you received the claim from ? Civil National Business Centre, Northampton Name of the Claimant ? Lowell Portfolio I Ltd How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self (just 1) Date of issue –  9th May 2024 Defence filing date: Tuesday 11th June?? Particulars of Claim What is the claim for  The claim is for the sum of £255.69 due by the Defendant under an agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 for a PayPal account with an account reference of xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)  The Defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a Default Notice was served under s.87(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 which has not been complied with. The debt was legally assigned to the claimant on 15-09-21, notice of which has been given to the defendant. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £0.00. The Claimant claims the sum of £255.69 What is the total value of the claim? £340.69 Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Not applicable Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? PayPal credit account When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After April 2007  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, shows as defaulted.  Registered when it was bought by Lowell Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Debt purchaser Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Cant find a letter that say so Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  Not sure Why did you cease payments? Financial difficulties and mental health issues What was the date of your last payment? ? Mid 2019 Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No
    • In addition to the advice and questions asked by my site team colleague above, where did you get the template from which you used to reply to the letter of claim?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3123 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

thanks fuzzbutt..ive got the link and filled out the appropriate forms and sent them off today...things are looking up.....i was at such a loss that 3 weeks ago i went down to moorcroft with 2 grand cash and offered it them as a final payment, just to get this whole mess sorted and they said barclays had rejected the offer..im so glad they did now knowing what i know now cause im guessing i wouldnt have seen it again they would probably still have chased me..thanks again fuzzbutt

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thanks fuzzbutt..ive got the link and filled out the appropriate forms and sent them off today...things are looking up.....i was at such a loss that 3 weeks ago i went down to moorcroft with 2 grand cash and offered it them as a final payment, just to get this whole mess sorted and they said barclays had rejected the offer..im so glad they did now knowing what i know now cause im guessing i wouldnt have seen it again they would probably still have chased me..thanks again fuzzbutt

 

There is also a group action on facebook if you need to talk to some more people

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from Moorcroft Debt Recovery today. I had previously requested a 'Deed of Assignment'. They say : "We have enclosed the requested documentation. .... As we have complied etc etc we request you make contact to discuss your proposals for repaying this debt".

What they have enclosed is a photocopy of my loan agreement form.

My guess is that this is NOT adequate proof that they have been assigned the debt. I don't think it constitutes a 'Deed of Assignment'. Has anyone else received similar letters? Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Lowdown, you tend to be our go-to guy for these matters. Any ideas / thoughts would be welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I received a letter from Moorcroft Debt Recovery today. I had previously requested a 'Deed of Assignment'. They say : "We have enclosed the requested documentation. .... As we have complied etc etc we request you make contact to discuss your proposals for repaying this debt".

What they have enclosed is a photocopy of my loan agreement form.

My guess is that this is NOT adequate proof that they have been assigned the debt. I don't think it constitutes a 'Deed of Assignment'. Has anyone else received similar letters? Does anyone have any thoughts about this? Lowdown, you tend to be our go-to guy for these matters. Any ideas / thoughts would be welcome.

 

 

A DOA would be a legal signed document from BPF assigning [or selling] the debt over to Moorcroft.

What you have there is a...erm... erm a photo copy of an agreement between BPF and you. That has nothing to do with Moorcroft, unless they signed it on your behalf....Lol

Write back to Moorcroft asking for a DOA - not a copy of an agreement between you and BPF.

Should give you a few more weeks grace while they [Moorcroft] Google DOA.

Edited by lowdown
Link to post
Share on other sites

End dates and guarantors

 

For Guarantors - Hausfeld advise that if the Advent docs don’t show an end date for the course then it would be worth submitting a complaint into FOS yourself as the payee of the course to see what approach they take. Try and attach a statement to your complaint from your partner/family member who was the student about whether they were told the course was open ended or not and see what happens. They may not accept it on the basis that you are not the student, but if you signed the credit agreement on the basis of this, then there might be a chance.

 

 

Fuzzbutt Does this mean that if there are end dates then there is no chance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fuzzbutt Does this mean that if there are end dates then there is no chance?

 

I honestly don't know, Penny. We won't know for sure until someone tries it and reports back on the decision they are given, but FOS seem to be disregarding the argument that the course was sold as open-ended unless the agreement clearly has an empty end date box.

FOS seem to be unsure themselves on this whole Advent issue to judge from the variety of rejection replies people are apparently getting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks i got a phone call from my f.o.s adjudicator regarding the lack of start or end dates on my contract ,unfortunately i was at work at the time and couldn't

really get into it with her but basically she said that in the terms a cons it states that the contract start date is from when an official company representative has signed the form

on the company's behalf ,and in the absence of an end date the contract last for two years.

I'm not happy with this but don't no what else to do , yet more evidence of the underhand dealings advent used?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks i got a phone call from my f.o.s adjudicator regarding the lack of start or end dates on my contract ,unfortunately i was at work at the time and couldn't

really get into it with her but basically she said that in the terms a cons it states that the contract start date is from when an official company representative has signed the form

on the company's behalf ,and in the absence of an end date the contract last for two years.

I'm not happy with this but don't no what else to do , yet more evidence of the underhand dealings advent used?

 

Did you point out that another fos adjudicator did not see it the same way?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi lowdown ,yeah i sent letter to my adjudicator along with copies of my enrollment forms pointing out the fact one of

there own staff had found in our favor.Dont no whats goin on...maybe this person who had decision go there way just got lucky...or maybe i should try a different adjudicator?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am new here but going throo the same situation.how can I join your class action?Plz help.

Exactly, 10pack - the first edited post with details of the law firm's offer was left alone for months, and no PM was sent to me or the original author about it.

That initial post now reads...

'A BIG GLOBAL CLAIMANTS FIRM HAS OFFERED TO REPRESENT EX-ADVENT, ACCESS2TRADE and PROPERTY PROFESSIONALS STUDENTS ON A NO WIN-NO FEE BASIS AGAINST Barclays PARTNER FINANCE.'

Which says nothing about anything, not even contact Fuzzbutt directly for details. So where do inquirers go from there?

 

Now newcomers may not only miss the original thread if they don't see the first post above, but have no idea how they can join this class action (group representative action, as Hausfeld prefer to call it in UK) which we've got going. Where's the sense in that? Certainly doesn't help the consumer, although I can appreciate why MONEY-MAKING adverts for fly-by-night legal companies cashing in are not allowed here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi folks i got a phone call from my f.o.s adjudicator regarding the lack of start or end dates on my contract ,unfortunately i was at work at the time and couldn't

really get into it with her but basically she said that in the terms a cons it states that the contract start date is from when an official company representative has signed the form

on the company's behalf ,and in the absence of an end date the contract last for two years.

I'm not happy with this but don't no what else to do , yet more evidence of the underhand dealings advent used?

 

Did your enrollment form state there is a fixed term of 2 years. This has been raised in the past as not all of the enrollment forms are the same and some have a fixed term where others do not. For instance, my wife's enrollment form states that the end of the contract is the earlier of the end date (which is blank) on the enrollment form or the date of which the final exam is taken. There is no "fixed term" specified as the "term" states the period from the defined "start" to the defined "end".

Link to post
Share on other sites

my enrolement forms say that the contract start date is when someone signs the contract on behalf of the company and that the end date is 2 years from the contract start date .?

Did your enrollment form state there is a fixed term of 2 years. This has been raised in the past as not all of the enrollment forms are the same and some have a fixed term where others do not. For instance, my wife's enrollment form states that the end of the contract is the earlier of the end date (which is blank) on the enrollment form or the date of which the final exam is taken. There is no "fixed term" specified as the "term" states the period from the defined "start" to the defined "end".
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey all. Just wondering does anyone one have a print out of the advent website when it first went into liquidation. I remember they had left a message that mentioned bout BPF pulling the funding. If any one does could u scan it and post it on this link. Thanks

 

Fuzzbutt is there any updates. Have BPF replied to last letter from Hausfeld yet. I thought they only had a set amount of time to reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear xxxx xxxxx

It is with the very greatest regret that I have to write to you to tell you that having tried our very best we have been unable to secure ongoing funding for the company and accordingly as matters currently stand we are unable to continue to provide your training.

Arrangements are being made for an insolvency practitioner to be appointed and I am sure you will be hearing from him. No doubt you will want to discuss the position with him or an adviser.

Yours sincerely

Advent Computer Training

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear xxxx xxxxx

It is with the very greatest regret that I have to write to you to tell you that having tried our very best we have been unable to secure ongoing funding for the company and accordingly as matters currently stand we are unable to continue to provide your training.

Arrangements are being made for an insolvency practitioner to be appointed and I am sure you will be hearing from him. No doubt you will want to discuss the position with him or an adviser.

Yours sincerely

Advent Computer Training

 

I had this as an email from advent.. it arrived in my spam box.. never heard anything from barclays at the time..

I was so new with my loan application the paperwork had not caught up with me and the situation, which is why i wonder how the hell advent managed to get my loan aproved with me being unemployed as well.. they must have lied through their teeth to barclays.. or maybe barclays are lying to me about sending the money to advent?, we are talking a few weeks between me signing up and advent going bust.. how long did it take for advent to go bust from when barclays pulled their funding.. days or weeks?

Link to post
Share on other sites

LATEST REPLY FROM MOORCROFT :-

"I write in response to your recent communication in relation to the above account and can confirm we have been in contact with Barclays Partner Finance who have advised us that this account was not sold to us and there is no deed of assignment.

I can confirm that i have placed this account on hold for 2 weeks and request that you make contact with our call centre on the above telephone number to discuss a repayment proposal you can afford and maintain"

Rofl they just wont give up i gave them proof that the account with Barclays is in dispute and they admitted to not having a DOA....... payment proposal i can afford and maintain.......hmmmm...... £5 a month is what i could afford but im not paying them **** and Heres Why :-

 

1. I was lied to when i was offered the course

2. I was unemployed, couldn't get a £5000 loan but course went through.....credit checked?.....ermmmm. no

3. Promised a job with the their dedicated careers team

4. Barclays cut funding for Advent hence we're in this situation

5. We weren't given a choice of service providers, just forced to go with Computeach

6. Alternate course is not like for like

 

So im asking, why is it so hard to cancel the agreement? Why can't some of us get our money back? If Barclays wins the case then i'm filing for bankruptcy cos this is all getting on my nerves

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately patience is key while its sorted. My credit rating is ruined until its all sorted and yes we all knows its a farce, but we will win the case and im hoping more action is taken upon barclays afterwards too.

 

P.s thanks for all the hard work and effort fuzz, very much a hero in my eyes.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately patience is key while its sorted. My credit rating is ruined until its all sorted and yes we all knows its a farce, but we will win the case and im hoping more action is taken upon barclays afterwards too.

 

P.s thanks for all the hard work and effort fuzz, very much a hero in my eyes.

 

I agree with you on all points, I had a prefect credit rating before all this.

 

barclays caused much of this (as well as advent), barclays has not bothered to co-operate with any of their customers over this.

not once have barclays asked me how they can help? or asked what do I want?

I feel that if they had offered options.. that to me would have been reasonable, but all we have had is.. take it or else!! with nothing but threats and demands.. barclays have to take the blame in this.

Edited by 10pack
Link to post
Share on other sites

Please contact OFT with your FOS decision letter. They are interested to hear the results of complaints and wrote to me...

"We have noted the details of your complaints and will continue to monitor the situation. We would, however, be interested in receiving further details of individual complaints where a Court or the FOS has upheld complaints against BPF. Likewise we would be interested in receiving updates with regard to the group legal action you are involved with. Updates can be sent to [email protected]. Complaint information is vital to the OFT as it helps us to monitor the conduct of licensees and to determine whether licensing action is appropriate."

 

Please Email [email protected] with a brief explanation and details of your decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...