Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.  Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Barclays Partner Finance)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3135 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Uneasy said - "I have another issue with the salesman mis selling. However, this is verbal and would require evidence from my witness the student and Barclays witness the salesman. Their defence would be that Advent’s salesman was being mischievous.,p/>I think the mis-selling is a strong point for us. It's worth researching on CompTIA, Microsoft and other IT qualification websites as to exactly when your exams on your course were due to expire/ be retired by Microsft (were you sold a qualification that would soon be redundant in the industry?), and were they even relevant? I found out I could have bypassed the MCSE and done the CIW design certification without it, so I was mis-sold a whole chunk of a course I did not need for the field I wanted to go into. The Microsoft A+ Essentials exams 220-601 and 220-602 (mainstream support for Windows Server 2003 MCSA) were retired in July 2010. Microsoft were already advising students in Nov 2009 apparently that the MCSA exam was due to be replaced.Author of the CompTIA study books used by Advent, Mike Meyers, comments on the ‘Go Certify’ website (http://www.gocertify.com/article/meyers-aplus.shtml) that the A+ is the “first certification to get for those wishing to embark in a career in PC repair. Of course, it seems no one stays as just a PC tech. As a tech's skills grow he tends to move up and out into more advanced aspects of the IT world: network administration, network infrastructure, management. The list is potentially long, but those who want to enter the IT world via the classic, entry-level PC tech position will find the A+ a welcome addition to their resumes.” (Emphasis mine). As further proof, I tried one of the free tests for the CIW Designer certificate on the ‘Pass it Now’ website (http://www.passitnow.com/ciw1.html) which allows would-be students to test their current IT knowledge on actual past exam questions to assess if a particular certificate is above/below their skill level before committing. I scored a pass mark, proving I didn't need the first certificate (which Advent salesman insisted I had to pass first). CIW sell their course packs and an exam voucher direct to the public on their own website. I could have just taken that and put myself in for the exam independantly.So were we being talked into doing modules and certificates we didn't need and would be useless in the real world? Worth you looking into this, plus of course the 'sign up quick or lose your place' pressure letter everyone was sent!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

My case is a guarantor for the student. As a matter of interestlink3.gif, my agreement states ‘This is a Credit Agreement regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. Sign it only if you want to be legally bound by its terms’, this is also repeated on the top of the Agreement form. According to the Ombudsmanlink3.gif’s final decision this cannot apply as the debtor-creditor-supplier relationship has not been created. So why put it on?

 

It isn't that the agreement isn't valid, or that it isn't bound by the consumer credit act, it is that section 75 of the consumer credit act (the bit that makes barclays liable for any breaches of contract or misrep on the part of advent) does not apply. Most of the rest of the consumer credit act will apply to the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what about the fact being we didnot deal directly with BPF, the loan part of the agreement was dealt by Advent, we didnot see any of the money, either cash or on the debit card nor did we see any of BPF rep, so now we have no course because advent is no more there and hence for BPF to recover or whatever the money is to dealt with advent , because I believe it was arrange in such a way to begin with so they (BPF) IMO must chase advent to get their money not us(Student), any thoughts ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mis-selling is still a serious breach of the law, but in my case I was investigating any written evidence that may be more easily accepted in defence.

 

A decision by the Ombudsman not to accept the extended termination period agreed by the salesman at the time has made me review the early letters received. I notice from a letter sent from BPF dated 22nd December 2009 (strange as I didn’t sign the agreement until the 23rd December 2009) states ‘You have 5 days starting with the day after you receive this notice’. The letter was received on the 4th January 2010, which takes us to the 10th January 2010 to cancel. According to the Advent web site at the time from a copy I took states ‘Funding from enrolments through Barclays made since the 9th January 2010 has been retained by Barclays and NOT forwarded to Advent’. Would it not have been prudent for Barclays to withhold advancing payments to Advent until after the cancellation deadline. In that case no money would have been forwarded. Just a thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
what about a few of us swearing affidavits confirming the misselling? has that been thought about?

 

someone a while back mentioned that she was prepared to take a lie detector test.. I thought that was extreamely good idea

 

anyone for Jeramy Kyle.. dont tick the box for a DNA test.. it could be maury who is the dad

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys

I take you have all been reading about the riots and that people have had the homes burned down?

 

well one woman in Tottenam whose home was burned down and bulldozed had this done

She called her bank.. The Woolwich asking is she could have a 2 month payment holiday.. the bank said no when she mentioned that her home no longer existed because its been bulldozed down could they not take this into account.. the bank said this makes no difference.. you owe us the money so you must pay.. does this sound familiar? well it should because guess who owns The Woolwich bank..

 

.. yes you guessed it.. lets have another round of applause for our friends at Barclays.. well done for yet another own goal in market PR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey everyone. I know its gone quiet on here but has anyone had any luck. I have recieved no contact from any debt collectors or barclays for a few months again. I have just been reading some posts on facebook and there is someone saying they have had their debt cleared. Apparently they got a solicitor Bartletts who contacted the ombudsman and now the person who posted this has recieved a letter from barclays saying they are offering to clear their debt. Fuzzbutt any updates or your court date or owt. Fuzzbutt your part of the facebook group that this has been posted on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey everyone. I know its gone quiet on here but has anyone had any luck. I have recieved no contact from any debt collectors or barclays for a few months again. I have just been reading some posts on facebook and there is someone saying they have had their debt cleared. Apparently they got a solicitor Bartletts who contacted the ombudsman and now the person who posted this has recieved a letter from barclays saying they are offering to clear their debt. Fuzzbutt any updates or your court date or owt. Fuzzbutt your part of the facebook group that this has been posted on.

 

I dont use facebook so I have not seen what you wrote about.

 

I would be very suspicious of barclays offer to write of debts.. its not in their nature to do so, usually when they do something its because they are made to do it, and to date the Ombudsman has been squarely on the side of barclays so I wonder what has happened.

 

Please take note that in early 90's when last recession had taken hold many people could no longer afford to pay the loans on their houses, they gave their house keys to the banks and the banks sold them on to get money back on the loans.. years later when things had settled the banks were back claiming that the loan was still in force and that payments were still due and was making them pay what ever they could towards the loans... we need to learn from history.. never trust banks.. specially when they are smiling

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what to make of the Facebook claim - I've asked the guy to give us more info as what he said is a bit sketchy. Apparently his solicitor got him out of his loan somehow, but he didn't explain on what grounds/arguments used (which would be helpful).The FB group is 'Advent Sca*med Us' if anyone wants to search for it via google.

I've had BPF's defence document now that they provided to the court to counter my claim - much of the same bull they supplied to FOS, pleading that they provided the 'bespoke' courses and we were all told about them. Don't know about anyone else but I wasn't informed by BPF or CT about the arrangement and lots of people on FB responded likewise when I asked if anyone had received notification and details of the new terms and conditions, or the new course breakdown. I didn't find out until months later and too late to take up the offer (even if I'd wanted to).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what to make of the Facebook claim - I've asked the guy to give us more info as what he said is a bit sketchy. Apparently his solicitor got him out of his loan somehow, but he didn't explain on what grounds/arguments used (which would be helpful).The FB group is 'Advent Sca*med Us' if anyone wants to search for it via google.

I've had BPF's defence document now that they provided to the court to counter my claim - much of the same bull they supplied to FOS, pleading that they provided the 'bespoke' courses and we were all told about them. Don't know about anyone else but I wasn't informed by BPF or CT about the arrangement and lots of people on FB responded likewise when I asked if anyone had received notification and details of the new terms and conditions, or the new course breakdown. I didn't find out until months later and too late to take up the offer (even if I'd wanted to).

 

Hi Fuzzbutt

I seem to only remember a letter in march from BPF informing me that they had found a new training company for me to continue studies.. the rest of the letter was telling me they would again start taking money from my account.

 

I do not remember seeing/reading any terms and conditions so no new contract etc.. though I do remember (will have to check) about extra 3 months study time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had just one letter too, 10pack, from CT introducing me to the new course (which they refused to supply me details of without me verifying my details - i.e signing up to them!).The first mention I saw of the bespoke arrangement was on CT website in an announcement in October, 7 months later. I'm using the dismal failure in communication between CT/BPF and the students in my defence (which I have to submit to the court next week).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had just one letter too, 10pack, from CT introducing me to the new course (which they refused to supply me details of without me verifying my details - i.e signing up to them!).The first mention I saw of the bespoke arrangement was on CT website in an announcement in October, 7 months later. I'm using the dismal failure in communication between CT/BPF and the students in my defence (which I have to submit to the court next week).

 

Good Luck next week

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks 10pack - will get an actual hearing date pretty soon after submission of evidence I hope. Small claim is supposed to be fast track - I just want it over now.

 

Good Luck Fuzz, I've been just keeping an eye to see how you get on and I truly hope you get them good and the Judge sees it for what we all know it to be.

Also Good Luck to anyone else doing the same. I'm not up to date with the thread.

I just feel screwed so am ignoring everyone and everything. Haven't found a light at the end of the tunnel still wallowing around in the dark alone. Truth is I gave up. it's made me ill.

I never hated anything with as much vengeance as I do this Bank.

Thanks too to you guys for keeping the thread going I keep hoping we'll hear of someone winning. I really hope you win Fuzz that would be great news and I'd like to thank you for everything

you have done along the way I'll look in again soon and will be sending good wishes your way as I'm sure everyone will be right behind you. :biggrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck Fuzz, I've been just keeping an eye to see how you get on and I truly hope you get them good and the Judge sees it for what we all know it to be.

Also Good Luck to anyone else doing the same. I'm not up to date with the thread.

I just feel screwed so am ignoring everyone and everything. Haven't found a light at the end of the tunnel still wallowing around in the dark alone. Truth is I gave up. it's made me ill.

I never hated anything with as much vengeance as I do this Bank.

Thanks too to you guys for keeping the thread going I keep hoping we'll hear of someone winning. I really hope you win Fuzz that would be great news and I'd like to thank you for everything

you have done along the way I'll look in again soon and will be sending good wishes your way as I'm sure everyone will be right behind you. :biggrin:

 

Thanks guys.

Keep your chin up, Bluedo! Could be light at the end of the tunnel for everyone if I win (which I'm confident of doing - have a pile of good evidence), even for those of you in the guarantors situation.

I'll let everyone know the court date when I get one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really hope you pull this off Fuzz, the financial aspect of things is really starting to hit me and family now and the £6000 spent on the course could really be put to good use elsewhere now.

 

Good luck from my whole family and me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck Fuzz, I've been just keeping an eye to see how you get on and I truly hope you get them good and the Judge sees it for what we all know it to be.

Also Good Luck to anyone else doing the same. I'm not up to date with the thread.

I just feel screwed so am ignoring everyone and everything. Haven't found a light at the end of the tunnel still wallowing around in the dark alone. Truth is I gave up. it's made me ill.

I never hated anything with as much vengeance as I do this Bank.

Thanks too to you guys for keeping the thread going I keep hoping we'll hear of someone winning. I really hope you win Fuzz that would be great news and I'd like to thank you for everything

you have done along the way I'll look in again soon and will be sending good wishes your way as I'm sure everyone will be right behind you. :biggrin:

 

I'm exactly feeling same. GOOD LUCK FUZZ.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...