Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap As far as am aware the loan was paid of some 8 years ago
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

spoof carphone warehouse contact go me a default - what can i claim?


loring
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am not sure if I have posted in the correct section of the forum. if not I would be thankful if someone move it to the correct place.

 

I am looking for some guidance as to how I should handle this untruthful bunch. I wii explain the storey so it will be a bit long winded.

In 2001 I bought a Fresh Mobile Sim Card costing £4.99 from Carphone Warehouse for a " pay as you go" phone which I already owned, just go in the shop or go online to top it up.

In 2004 I stopped using it, and got a monthly contract phone from T Mobile. Carphone Warehouse sent me a letter claiming I had not paid my bill and I was to send them £22. I wrote back I did not owe them any money as I was using a pay as you go sim card. I heard no more from them.

In July 2009 I send away for a copy of my credit file and was horrified to find that Carphone Warehouse had placed a default on my file in 2005 for a debt of £22.

I have battled with them since July 2009 till July 2010 to have this default removed.

At first CW claimed the alleged debt of £22 was for the monthly rental which I had not paid. They claimed that they sent me monthly statements for this account every month since 2001 and that when I stopped paying they sent me a default notice, which I did not respond to, so they had no option but to place the account in default.

I wrote to them and explained that I only purchased a pay as you go sim card and there was no monthly contract to pay and I also told them I never received any statements or default notices from them. I sent an SAR but they did't respond and sent my money back.

I kept at them and they have now changed their storey totally. They now claim to have discovered the account is a "fraudulent account" and removed the default in July 2010. They refuse to give me any information about this fraud which they claim was carried out under my name.They return my SAR statutory fees and won't provide any documentation.

They say they are going to credit my account with a £50 voucher, but I don't have an account with them, unless It could be another fraudulent one. The story about the account being a fraudulent one is total nonsense, I know that I bought the sim card and topped it up when I needed, fraud does come into it at all, it is an attempt to cover their tracks for issuing me a default I topped up the card at one of their shops and later online using my debit card. There is absolutely no fraud involved. I have sent them another SAR and this time I will hold out for some answers.

I would like to tell them what they can do with their £50 voucher but before I do, have any posters think I may have a case for getting more than a £50 voucher, after all they defaulted me when I queried the alleged debt with them. The default was on my account for 5 years and for a fairly paltry sum of £22. Who should I report this matter to and would I be entitled to any sort of compensation for their actions. I requested the ICO to investigate the matter but he wrote back basically saying that if Carphone Warehouse said the account was fraudulent then it must be as they had always found Carphone Warehouse reliable when handling data.

Glad to hear any advice or views on what I can now do.

I have sent them another SAR and I am waiting for a response to that.

 

Thanks

loring

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

per i think thats as far as it can go

p'haps ask for a voucher as you don't have an a/c with them?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When 'Fresh' was launched in 2000 it was the first attempt at a 'virtual' PAYG service operated not by a network, but a third party 'virtual' operator. As such, this had a number of failings - it was not possible to tightly control the users account, which meant that the customer could actually overspend the available balance and if they stopped using it, would end up having a negative balance which CW would have to chase. This lasted for a few years until the networksa offered the same PAYG controls for the virtual operators. I believe it is this, NOT fraud, and because it happened so long ago there's probably not anyone who was there at the time who remembered how dreadful the original system was. A look at the service contract you agreed to - why did you not query this as a PAYG customer? - even stated that some charges would be billed in arrears and users should ensure their accounts are adequately funded. This contract also warned that details of your financial dealings would be shared with CRA's. Again, why - for PAYG?

 

Fresh was a lash up from the beginning, and its lack of account control meant it was always a bad move for consumers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Buzby

I only purchased a SIM card from Carphone Warehouse for £4.99. There was no contract with it, when your credit was down to about £1.00 they would text you and tell you you needed more credit. You would take the SIM card to the shop, give them £10.00 and they would add the credit to SIM. There was no paperwork, later it was possible to add the credit online.There was nothing to question.

I had no problem with the service and stopped using it in 2004. It was July 2009 when I found out they put a default on my credit file in September 2005. They never told me.

loring

Link to post
Share on other sites

what can i claim?
Who should I report this matter to and would I be entitled to any sort of compensation for their actions.

Have you been out of pocket at all? IF you can prove you're out of pocket, and IF you can prove CPW was at fault then maybe you can claim money from them in court.

 

The easier route would be to complain as high as you can, tell them what you would accept as reasonable. If you are unhappy with their offer to rectify their error, then write bask asking for them to escalate the complaint higher.

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

typically it's £1000 a wrong marker

if its affected you availability to credit, then the sky's the limit.

 

i'e if you have been refused credit / mortgage/employment because of it.

 

there is a big long thread around on cag about a guy that got several £10k's for such a marker

 

but its finding it

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...