Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Apparently some journalists have heard that Sunak may call an election next weekend or in the week following the bank holiday Monday. With the election to be held at the end of June. Rishi Sunak could call snap general election | Politics | News | Express.co.uk WWW.EXPRESS.CO.UK Here's why the Prime Minister could announce a general election soon  
    • Found a BMA article related to this subject which I think the OP will find helpful. Patients recording consultations WWW.BMA.ORG.UK Our guidance answers if patients can record doctors without permission or covertly, how to respond when a patient asks to record their appointment and what to do if a covert recording is posted online.  
    • Ah - that was another thread that got merged back in 2018   That 'split' doesnt refer to this legal matter  
    • Thanks dx for your kind words. I plan to renew my season ticket and write a new begging letter as following, can I ask for any suggestion about it?   Dear Investigator/Prosecutor,   Thank you for your reply. I deeply regret my actions and the inconvenience they have caused.   I’m extremely remorseful for my crime. and regret it everyday. I often ask myself ‘’how can I do that thing just because I felt it is interesting. There are a lot of crimes in the world, but feeling it’s interesting is certainly not a reason to crime. I should not crime with any reason.’’ I think about these things every day, and I understand that I can’t blame anyone but myself.   I thanks to the staff who stopped me, as this is a valuable lesson in my life. I told myself that I should never ever repeat such a thing again, and never ever do anything which is possible to be in breach of any law. As a result, I carefully tap my oyster card every time before I enter the station now. I remind myself that I did a wrong thing before, and I should never let it happen again.   Although my monthly travel expenses do not warrant a season ticket, but I just renew my season ticket (please see the attachment). I understand that a crime cannot be truly compensated for, but purchasing a season ticket offers me a small measure of comfort, knowing that my actions caused a loss to the public interest.   I received an email which ask me to negotiate being class teacher in this summer (please see the attachment). I hope that I could teach the lovely students again, which may not be allowed with a criminal record. I would please ask that you would please provide me a single opportunity to settle all outstanding sums owed outside of court without the need for legal proceedings which would have a determinantal impact on my teaching career.   I sincerely apologise again for my crime. If you need anything further from me to help you please let me know.    Yours sincerely,
    • You did what??? You asked them to send you the documents that without them you had  a 100% ironclad win in Court. Why on earth would you do that? As it happens in this case, there is still enough mistakes in their PCNs and the NTH to have your case cancelled. Amd it may be that not sending those documents in the first place along with the ICO complaint and the letters from Alliance themselves which would confirm by the dates on the letters may be enough to cancel it anyway. I hope you have kept their letters as evidence? The chances are that Alliance will not actually take you to Court because of their errors but you never know.  You have made so much extra work for yourself in your WS if they decide to push their luck.though. Can you please post up their letter where they give the reason why I wasn't sent with the NTH.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA to be replaced by the ‘personal independence payment’


paulb1310
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4888 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thought someone would have posted on this already ... this from another website.

Government launches consultation on disability benefit reform

The government has today launched a consultation on a proposal to replace disability living allowance (DLA) with a new benefit, the personal independence payment.

Introducing the consultation, 'Disability Living Allowance reform', Minister for Disabled People Maria Miller states that -

'Personal independence payment will maintain the key principles of DLA, providing cash support to help overcome the barriers which prevent disabled people from participating fully in everyday life, but it will be delivered in a fairer, more consistent and sustainable manner. It is only right that support should be targeted at those disabled people who face the greatest challenges to leading independent lives. This reform will enable that support, along with a clearer, more straightforward assessment process.

Personal independence payment will also be a more dynamic benefit – it will take account of changes in individual circumstances and the impact of disabilities, as well as wider changes in society, such as social attitudes and equality legislation.'

The DWP states that it plans to introduce the new benefit in 2013/14, when it will begin reassessing the working age (16-64 year olds) caseload, and that it is considering whether to reassess children and people aged over 65.

Key features of the personal independence payment set out in the consultation document include -

  • the new benefit will have two components, each with two rates - the ‘mobility’ component will be based on a claimant's ability to get around, while the ‘daily living’ component will be based on their ability to carry out 'other key activities necessary to participate in everyday life';
  • claimants will have to qualify for the benefit for a period of six months and be expected to continue to qualify for a further six months before an award can be made;
  • there will no automatic entitlements for people with specified health conditions - other than the special rules for people who are terminally ill - instead, each case will be looked at individually;
  • entitlement will be based on an 'objective assessment' focusing on a claimant's ability to carry out a range of 'key activities necessary to everyday life';
  • the assessment process will include information from the claimant and health care professionals who look after them, and, in most cases, there will be a face-to-face meeting with an independent healthcare professional 'allowing an in-depth analysis of an individual’s circumstances';
  • the personal independence payment will take greater account of aids and adaptations and the DWP is considering how best to take account of these in the assessment in a way that reflects how they are used and paid for;
  • the DWP will take into account the way that DLA currently 'passports' the claimant to other benefits in its reforms, and will also consider how it interacts with other forms of support, for example adult social care, and explore whether it is possible to share information at the assessment stage and eliminate areas of overlap.
  • all awards will be periodically reviewed and there will be penalties if a claimant knowingly fails to report a change that would have resulted in a reduction in benefit;
  • the DWP is exploring ways to help individuals manage their health condition or impairment.

The consultation runs until 14 February 2010.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hows about a link to the consultation paper?

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/dla-reform-consultation.pdf

 

Conclusions;

1; the re-classification of disability to the social model continues i.e. work in the magic cure for all. (see 6)

2; they're having hard time relating this to work and the lies have started. i.e. DLA might be a barrier to work

3; the introduction of a single test for both ESA & DLA

4; reducing the award levels from 3 tiers to 2

5; you will be assessed with helper aids in mind.

6; absolutely no mention of mental health what so ever (see 1) as it's caused by lack of work so not relevant as it doesn't exist.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hows about a link to the consultation paper?

 

http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/dla-reform-consultation.pdf

 

Conclusions;

1; the re-classification of disability to the social model continues i.e. work in the magic cure for all. (see 6)

2; they're having hard time relating this to work and the lies have started. i.e. DLA might be a barrier to work

3; the introduction of a single test for both ESA & DLA

4; reducing the award levels from 3 tiers to 2

5; you will be assessed with helper aids in mind.

6; absolutely no mention of mental health what so ever (see 1) as it's caused by lack of work so not relevant as it doesn't exist.

 

 

You only need to read this line.

 

We are committed to a sustainable and fair system that allows people to work when they can and provides unconditional support to those who are unable to work.

 

And just who decides who is unable to work?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another good one.

 

This might mean, for example, considering an individual’s ability to get about in a wheelchair, rather than ignoring the wheelchair, as we do currently.

 

So if you can't walk, they give you a Wheelchair and tell you to get on with it.

"Just wheel yourself down to the Job Centre"

 

It'd be funny if it wasn't so serious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It just goes from bad to worse. When are the public going to realize what they are up to and put a stop to this. I found there proposals extremely distressing. Yet more proof that the government is just out there for the rich and that to them we are meaningless individuals not human beings. They just want total control and power and our taxes so they are taking away all our rights and any benefit that assists with paying our bills and live with even the basic quality of life so that we are slaves to there demands When they first brought in the smoking ban, I said to many this would happen and people thought I was being melodramatic. But it is what is happening and still people are too blind to see what is happening in front of there eyes. We need a revolution to put a stop to this before it is too late. Our children and grandchildren will have no future if we continue to allow this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another little gem I've found ...

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) is in talks with the government about the private sector taking responsibility for the provision of welfare benefits. Nick Kirwan , assistant director at the ABI, said the trade body is exploring the possibility of life companies providing incapacity benefit and jobseeker’s allowance. ‘We are engaged with the government and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Treasury officials over models and viability,’ he said.’

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another little gem I've found ...

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) is in talks with the government about the private sector taking responsibility for the provision of welfare benefits. Nick Kirwan , assistant director at the ABI, said the trade body is exploring the possibility of life companies providing incapacity benefit and jobseeker’s allowance. ‘We are engaged with the government and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Treasury officials over models and viability,’ he said.’

 

It all started in the 80s with Thatcher selling off the utilities to the private sector.

This is just the next stage, sack all the workers, sell it off to big business, hire new staff on very inferior contracts.

And the taxpayer picks up the bill as usual.

 

Its the capitalist system, privatise everything!

Its all very frightening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...