Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello all,   I ordered a laptop online about 16 months ago. The laptop was faulty and I was supposed to send it back within guarantee but didn't for various reasons. I contacted the company a few months later and they said they will still fix it for me free of charge but I'd have to pay to send it to them and they will pay to send it back to me. The parcel arrived there fine. Company had fixed it and they sent it via dpd. I was working in the office so I asked my neighbours who would be in, as there's been a history of parcel thefts on our street. I had 2 neighbours who offered but when I went to update delivery instructions, their door number wasn't on the drop down despite sharing the same post code.  I then selected a neighbour who I thought would likely be in and also selected other in the safe place selection and put the number of the neighbour who I knew would definitely be in and they left my parcel outside and the parcel was stolen. DPD didn't want to deal with me and said I need to speak to the retailer. The retailer said DPD have special instructions from them not to leave a parcel outside unless specified by a customer. The retailer then said they could see my instructions said leave in a safe space but I have no porch. My front door just opens onto the road and the driver made no attempt to conceal it.  Anyway, I would like to know if I have rights here because the delivery wasn't for an item that I just bought. It was initially delivered but stopped working within the warranty period and they agreed to fix it for free.  Appreciate your help 🙏🏼   Thanks!
    • As the electric carmaker sees sales fall and cuts jobs, we take a closer look at its problems.View the full article
    • Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this? Every day is a school day.
    • Hi Guys, well a year on and my friend has just received this in the post today, obviously a little scared so looking for more of your advice.  Letter from the NCC dated 1-May-2024 is as follows.......   Before deputy district judge Haythorne sitting at the national business centre, 4th floor st Kathrine's house Northampton Upon reading an application from the claimant  it is ordered that  1. The claim be sent to the county court at #### (Friends local Court) Because this order has been made without a hearing, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed.  A party making such an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.  If the application is one which requires a hearing, and a) the party making the application is the defendant: and b) the defendant is an individual, then upon filing of the application the claim will be transferred to the defendants home court.  In all other cases requiring a hearing the claim will be transferred to the preferred court.    As a result of an order made on the 1 May 2024, this claim has been transferred to the county court at ##### (friends local court) 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard Cabot Harassment for old Barclaycard debt - in scotland - Please help


24233513afw
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4393 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:p

 

 

telephone harrassment:

 

Your Street

Town

City

Postcode

 

DATE HERE

Company Name

Road

Town

City / County

Postcode

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

Dear Sirs

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to, FOS, OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

[NAME HERE]

 

 

ida x

  • Haha 1

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not sure you're correct to tell them 'account in default' if they have supplied a CCA request, enforceable or not. Hit them with this, from section 65 of the Act itself:-

 

65(1) Consequences of improper execution.

 

An improperly-executed regulated agreement is enforceable against the debtor or hirer on an order of the court only

 

 

+ 1 to what Ida says, cos I had both sets of b******s on my back. I got the local Trading Standards involved and they paid them a visit and they shut up after that.

 

 

they haven't produced any agreement, that's why it's still in dipute, if they supplied and agremeent with a prescribed term missing or sig etc that's a bit different

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
they haven't produced any agreement, that's why it's still in dipute, if they supplied and agremeent with a prescribed term missing or sig etc that's a bit different

 

ida x

There are people on this forum who appear to disagree with the last part of your statement, Ida, though I am in complete agreement. I'm sure I have asked before for clarification on this but can't seem to recall anyone other than The Shadow confirming this. I think it's quite important because my old bank tried to trip me up over it, asking why I thought the account was still 'in dispute' after they had sent what they had. It's crucial that the 'in dispute' term is made clear; perhaps the legal bods on the site team can clear this up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya

Wee update foryou all...another letter from FOS advising that they are ready to contact BC regarding charges to get their side of the story-whatever that maybe.. Sent Calder telephone harrassment letter but they are still calling everyday but only twice a day instead 6 times a day so I suppose its a bit of a progress. Will keep you all updated as sson as Ihear anything.

AFW

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have snet te harrassment letter, keep a notebook at the side of the fone and starting logging dates and times of calls

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Use this Address to write to Barclays/Barclaycard. Let them Pay for your Postage. It is also their Head Office Address.

 

Customer Relations

Barclays Bank PLC (Also includes Goldfish Cards & Loans)

1 Churchill Place

FREEPOST

RTLA-CSUE-TCHC

London

E14 5HP

 

If you ever take action through the Scottish Courts, all you have to do is provide the address of a Barclays Branch in Scotland for the Court Papers to be sent to for your local Sheriff Court to have Jursidiction.

 

Remember that on December 1st 2009, The Scottish Court Procedure will change. From that Date, the Court will only enforce a Credit Agreement if the "Original" Signed Document is provided in the Summons or Defence.

 

If you want to Challenge any Agreement (Like Me), wait til that date.

 

Remember also, Your Agreement plus all of the terms and conditions relating to APR, Charges etc have to be on the same page as your signature for it to be valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been reading your thread with interest. I am also going through this with Barclays having initially made a cca request last December. Been passed around to Mercers, Calder and a Scottish dca (can't remember their name off the top of my head) with threats of door step collecters and hundreds of phone calls. All went quiet around 8 weeks ago so I'm just sitting tight and waiting to see what happens next. Appears to be great news about the December 1st thing.

:)

Will keep watching your thread to see how you get on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dundeelaw - won't Barclays, being ostensibly based in England, have their contracts written under English law?

 

I don't know how relevant this is but it's something I often think about since i looked at the small print on my RBS credit card agreement. It clearly states that the relevant law is the Law of England and this despite them being the Royal Bank of Scotland ?

 

Any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ricyd - a while ago in my Barclaycard thread I asked about whether I would have to go to a court in England if it came to court action and I was advised by Slick who is a member of the Site Team:

"If you or the bank start court action and a defence is filed, you would seek and get a transfer of the case to your local county court. This is where the case would by run from and where any hearings would be held"

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's fair enough, but what if you started the case in Jersey for example?

 

I'm sure it's straightforward enough but I wondered whether the different jurisdiction would make any difference. If it doesn't I can foresee a lot of cases heading this way following the December 1st change in procedure.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dundeelaw - won't Barclays, being ostensibly based in England, have their contracts written under English law?

 

I don't know how relevant this is but it's something I often think about since i looked at the small print on my RBS credit card agreement. It clearly states that the relevant law is the Law of England and this despite them being the Royal Bank of Scotland ?

 

Any ideas?

 

 

What difference does it make? We are dealing with, mainly, the CCA 1974.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know, but given the changes due to arrive in Scotland in December doesn't this create an interesting factor relating to the degree of proof required to complete a case? All I'm asking is if this will strengthen the consumers position and make life more difficult for the lenders (at least in Scotland) if everyone suddenly decides to start their cases here?

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised if buried in the detail there's a time limit, it isn't retrospective or only applies to Scottish contracts or those taken out at Scottish addresses. It would be like having different rates of VAT/Income Tax/IHT etc between the two countries.

 

Look at the chaos we have with the current healthcare post code lottery for prescribing drugs/prescription charges etc.

 

I know this government aren't exactly the best at framing legislation, but this looks like a disaster waiting to happen (unless they have decided to nudge more cases through the Scottish courts to relieve pressure on English courts?

 

I guess we'll need to wait and see.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Folks

 

SUCCESS AT LAST

 

Wee update on Barclaycard Charges, wrote to FOS and they have just replied with an offer of the charges from Barclaycard Credit Card.

They are going to pay full charges I asked for this now only leaves a balance of a few hundred pounds on this account which is absolutly great news to us.

Although they still haven't came up with the CCA that we requested for this account so I am in a bit of a tizzz on whether to sign up with an arrangement for the balance or let them sing for it....after all the worry they have put us through with their threats (but maybe they are not good singers though).

 

PLEASE DONT GIVE UP TRYING I MUST ADMIT I NEARLY DID, IF IT WASN'T FOR ALL YOU GOOD KIND PEOPLE ON HERE I THINK I WOULD HAVE THROWN THE TOWEL IN LONG BEFORE NOW.

 

Cheers

AFW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi

 

Have been getting inundated with phone calls from Cabot Financial over the past week - 10 days couldn't understand why - until a lovely welcome letter arrived on friday stating that the have been assigned my alleged Credit Card Debit.

 

This Credit Card Debit iswith Barclaycard and we managed to get the charges back but still left a balance, however Barclaycard never ever sent us a copy of the CCA that we requested they had only sent us a copy of T & C which Ida had confirmed where unencforceable, did send a letter to BC stating this but they were adament they had complied....that was away back in June 2009.

 

Never heard a dickybird from them since June 2009 until last Friday when a letter from cabot arrived not quite sure how to reply Cabot regarding this alleged account as BC have not provided a enforceable CCA.

 

Can anybody help comply a letter to Cabot regarding this alleged account.

 

SHould I send another CCA request with £1 P.O. to Cabot

 

They are asking me to contact them to arrange a payment plan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Id reply with a letter along these lines....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?426-A-letter-when-the-account-has-been-passed-to-another-debt-collection-agency

 

 

The account is in dispute , no debt is acknowledged, therefore they can not sell the account on to someone else...

My Posts exist exclusively to assist me in preparing litigation against another party.

As such, it is almost certainly protected by litigation privilege.

 

The legal requirements for claiming litigation privilege are well established and are not in dispute.

Communication between a solicitor, or the client, or a third party will be protected by litigation privilege where the communications are for the dominent purpose of obtaining legal advice in connection with, or conducting litigation in prospect: Re: "Highgate Traders Limited (1984)"BCLC 151.

 

Copyright Information: All information contained in this website , Associated websites, and Forum posts are Copyright "Reclaim The Right Ltd". If you wish to use the information on this site for publication elsewhere then please email the administrator for permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am aware it is an absolute pain,

with the ping pong with Barclaycard and DCAs..

.......the letter GeoffreyAlby indicates is the best to keep using....

 

 

.......if it is any help I am 18 months down the road with BC and DCAs still no agreement

,complain to OFT/FOS,

 

 

how long since you paid anything or acknowledged the debt???????????????????...

........you will probably reach the stage when BC ask YOU to prove why you should not pay them even though they cannot produce an agreement,

 

 

they really have a neck and still get away with ignoring the OFT/FOS guidelines,

we will win,i

n the mean time keep sending the account in dispute letters...............FS

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi

 

Have been getting inundated with phone calls from Cabot Financial over the past week - 10 days couldn't understand why - until a lovely welcome letter arrived on friday stating that the have been assigned my alleged Credit Card Debit.

 

This Credit Card Debit iswith Barclaycard and we managed to get the charges back but still left a balance, however Barclaycard never ever sent us a copy of the CCA that we requested they had only sent us a copy of T & C which Ida had confirmed where unencforceable, did send a letter to BC stating this but they were adament they had complied....that was away back in June 2009.

 

Never heard a dickybird from them since June 2009 until last Friday when a letter from cabot arrived not quite sure how to reply Cabot regarding this alleged account as BC have not provided a enforceable CCA.

 

Can anybody help comply a letter to Cabot regarding this alleged account.

 

SHould I send another CCA request with £1 P.O. to Cabot

 

They are asking me to contact them to arrange a payment plan

 

I think the ruling last November 2009 by Scottish Sheriffs about the claimant either having to show or "aver" they have an enforceable CCA might protect you? - see Ida's earlier thread on this.

 

Funnily enough I've had exactly the same from Cabot very recently - loads of recent calls out of the blue to my (company) mobile. I spoke to them and they actually have an address which I haven't ever lived at. They won't tell me who the OC is and claim I owe THEM (not an OC) the money - but won't give me any more details unless I give them a current address - and a non business phone number (AYE - RIGHT!).

 

I have refused to give them this - and have told them any OC should know where I live - but they say they'll just continue to ring my company mobile unless I give them other contact info. However I'm a bit worried of ending up with a CCJ (or Scottish equivalent) since any court papers sent to a wrong address won't get to me - a tactic seemingly frequently adopted by Bryan Carter/Frederickson/Egg?

 

Does anyone know if Cabot use the same tactics?

 

I know I could probably get any such judgement set aside if they use a wrong or out of date address - but what about my refusal to give them an up to date address and home phone number? Would this prejudice my chances of getting it set aside?

 

Would the Nov 2009 ruling on them "averring" they have an enforceable agreement perhaps stop it going to court at all?

 

I've also got a couple of older debts fast approaching the Scottish 5 year SB date. - and this might relate to one of these. Would any court judgement before the 5 years are actually up prejudice this SB protection even though I've made no payments or admitted the debts for (nearly) 5 years at present? I intend to sit it out until after 5 years if I can, but Cabot might screw this up if they act fast enough.

 

If Cabot are contacting loads of new debtors then it might suggest they've bought up some old (unenforceable?) debts. Anyone else add weight to this theory? Who was your OC?

 

Any advice please as to how I should proceed with Cabot right now?

 

BD

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BF

 

Not too sure how you should tackle this one,

hopefully somebody more experienced could chip in.

 

 

My OC is Barclaycard.

 

I just won a case in the scottish courts in September

part of my defence was regarding the new scottish Act of Sederant law for the Sheriff Court

where the creditor has to aver to there being a enforceable CCA

 

 

my case was against Creation Finance and they did not aver in their particulars of claim on the citation

 

 

so with lots of help from Seriouslyfedup,

 

 

Ida on here we sent them away with their tail between their legs.

Cheers

AFW

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...