Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Go Debt Statutary Demand Pre Dated, Please Help


FozzCov
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4918 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 79
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Scedule of Costs (summary assessmant)

 

CLAIM NUMBER XXXXXXXX

 

IN THE XXXXX COUNTY COURT

 

SET ASIDE APPLICATION OF A STATUTORY DEMAND FOR BANKRUPTCY

Claimant YOURSELF

 

Defendant GODEBT

 

Date xx/xx/xxxx

 

Claimed under rule 48.6 at £9.25 per hour

 

Date of Work 26/10/2010

 

Descrition of work

 

Law of Property act 1925 ten hours at £9.25 an hour total £92.50

Date of work

 

27/10/2010

 

Drafting witness statement - two hours at 9.25 an hour Total £18.50

 

Considering claimants reply/defence - one hour at £9.25 an hour Total £9.25

 

Preparing court bundle - one hour at £9.25 an hour Totlal £9.25

 

Drafting statement of costs -one hour at £9.25 an hour Total £9.25

 

Attendance at court - one hour at £9.25 an hour Total £9.25

 

Other fees/Recorded delivery - two at £1.15 Total £2.30

GRAND TOTAL CLAIMED £150.30

 

 

SEND TO GODEBT BY RECORDED DELIVERY AND A COPY TO THE COURT

 

 

 

 

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 2Grumpy, No i dont have any paperwork anymore and as they are now run by another franchise they dont have any record now i am worried! Because it was a few years ago i just thought it was all done and dusted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm well as its now called a totally different name to what it was 4 years ago i assumed they closed and repopened as this new company, I will do some more research and see what i can come up with!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today recieved correspondence from Hollis Briggs Solicitors, Stating that GO DEBT are going ahead with bankruptcy proceedings they go in to detail about how I defaulted and the debt was transferred to them and that they had sent out a deed of assignment to two address neither of them being my own, at the end it says:

The application, I understand from the application together with the witness statement of the applicant dated xxxxx that the applicant disputes the statutory demand on a number of purported grounds,

I am advised that the court may set aside the statutory demand on one of the grounds listed as rule 6.5(4) of the insolvency rules 1986. i am advised that the matters discussed in the witness statement do not disclose sufficient grounds to set aside the statutory demand.

Firstly i am advised that the matters complained of relating to the statutary demnad cannot be said to make that statutory demand so confusing and misleading that, having regard to all the circumstances, justice requires that it should be set aside. the applicant is perfectly aware of his obligations for some time. the applicant does not point to any prejudice suffered by him at all.

Secondly, I am advised that there are no substantial grounds on which the debt due under the agreement can be disputed. the legal representative of the respondent will explain how as a matter of the law the applicants purported grounds are wholly misconceived and how in particular the cases referred to by the applicant are of no relevance here.

For these reasons, it is the respondent’s position that this matter should be dealt with by way of bankruptcy proceedings rather than CPR part 7 proceedings.

For all the reasons set out above, I respectfully suggest that this application should be dismissed.

Signed William Rhodes MD GO DEBT...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try not to worry on this

 

godebt now know they cant brow beat you and the judge will slap there wrists for using a sd instead of an n1 claim

 

judges dont like there time being wasted on the likes of a dca clogging up the courts as a cheap way to secure a debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attended court today but i was 10 minutes late due to being in the wrong part of the court house, the judge did not agree to have it setaside and has awarded costs to the otherside. They told me the judge had already looked at my case but had now left. The usher said i can fill out a N244 form. any ideas as to what i put on this for?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i totally agree it was my own fault and this will not be a mistake i will be making again! I gave in the N244 form Tuesday morning along with the correct fee requesting a Set aside hearing, i am now awaiting for a new hearing for the Set aside. Can the new set aside hearing be dismissed on the grounds that it was dismissed first time around?? Or do they have to give me a new hearing?? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked to have it set aside again as i was not present at the hearing due to not being fully aware of which part of the court i should have been in and arriving at the right part 10 minutes late. I apologised for this and asked if i could have a new hearing on those grounds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

I will be in Court on Monday for another hearing to have it set aside, I have recieved two letters today from Hollis Briggs the first one is a witness statement from the original creditor stating that Go Debt have the right to recover the debt owed under the conditional sale agreement, the second is a statement of supplementary costs incured Totalling £625.94 on top of there prvious fees. it looks like they will have there own solicitor present at the hearing. Any advice would be much appreciated. Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are going to have represenation there then they will be arguing against you.

 

You will need to be very clear in your arguments about assignment and about the enforceability of the agreement.

 

Are you sure that you fully understand the basis for defending on the grounds of no notice of assignment and also you haven't posted up a large enough copy of the agreement for people to give any advice as to it's enforceability.

 

As you will be facing a solicitor you will need to be able to quote all the relevant sections of the law and make reference to the appropriate precedents as well.

 

This is what happened in my case when I had an opposed set aside hearing:-

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?137495-Statutory-Demand-and-set-aside-application&p=1481216&viewfull=1#post1481216

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...