Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO - UK Debt, Living in US


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello Everyone,

 

I left the UK about 4 and a half years ago with debt that unfortunately I was unable to pay. It was about 8,000 GBP made up of 4 separate credit cards. The last time I made a payment was roughly the same time. Recently a voice message was left on my work phone, transferred from one of our customer service departments. The message was from a gentleman asking me to call him in London about an "urgent matter". I have found the number provided is for HFO Services, Debt recovery company.

 

How should I proceed from here? I don't have any information on amount owed, how many of the credit cards this is regarding, etc. I presume they do not have my home address and I don't have a home phone.

 

Thanks for any input,

 

Mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 67
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sounds like they may have tracked you down to your place of work via a linkedin search. DCA **** are buying premium accounts on this service for just this purpose.

 

They are chancing it. IMHO any contact with DCA **** will only encourage them. If they can never reach you via phone and you do not respond to any contact, they will move along to easier targets who are more open to suggestion.

 

Even if this DCA has done somthing dodgy and combined the debt 8k is nothing in the current scheme of things. Just ignore them. It costs them money to keep trying to imtimadate you. They will soo give up if there no response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a clear period of six years (five in Scotland) where you made no payment or written acknowledgement of the debt it will be Statute Barred.

 

Unless they have previously obtained a CCJ against you whilst you were resident in the UK there isn't a great deal they can do. If they have obtained a CCJ after you left the UK or by using a previously known address you can get the judgement set aside.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Ignore - if they do get hold of you don't get into conversation and don't confirm to them who you are or give any details. Just say HF who? They will drivvel on about 'legal matters' and make up all sorts of threats. They do not know that you are the right person, as they could be chasing someone of the same name, just because you had credit cards once don't assume they have it right. It will be one card that they have bought, I would have thought, not all of them - possibly Barclaycard, MS Goldfish or Citi. It is unlikely that they have obtained the correct paperwork for these.

 

They are nasty and work on intimidation - watch out for emails, contact through Linkedin, anything sneaky that you don't know where it is from.

 

There is certainly evidence here of them trying to contact people through their employers - leaving messages, discussing confidential information with work colleagues etc, all against official guidelines. You may have to tell your work that you are receiving 'nuisance calls' from this company but hopefully they will give up. Don't be tempted to contact them.

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for everyone's responses. My concern is even if the 6 years passes, and the debt is not legally enforceable from the UK, what are the odds that it is transferred to a US DCA and legal matters begin over here, is it still not enforceable? I assume the worst they could do is hurt my credit if it is transferred to the US.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update to this, the same person left a message on my managers voice mail today. Other than telling my employer I am receiving nuisance calls, there's not much else I can do with this until they quit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a lot you can do as under OFT guidelines in the UK they can contact you at work if they have no other contact details. However if they break the Data Protection Act by revealing why they are trying to contact you then you'll be able to make a complaint to the ICO.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just spoke to my father at my previous residence in the UK and he received a letter from them regarding this. He also spoke to the gentleman on the phone, and they are threatening to send bailiffs around to my previous residence, and they said they know the state I live in, my wife and my employer. (probably from social networking site as others suggested). They also stated they will request the debt from over here now that they have a dossier on my information.

 

I am a little perplexed now, continuing to ignore this probably won't make the calls stop now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cannot send a Bailiff round anywhere, least of all your fathers property without a court order & to get that they would need to have a CCJ first which they can't obtain against a non-UK resident.

 

Your father should complain to Trading Standards via Consumer Direct about these empty threats; http://www.consumerdirect.gov.uk/contact

They also stated they will request the debt from over here now that they have a dossier on my information.
As above, not without a CCJ they won't.... which they can't get.

 

Also see this; http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2010/65-10

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found out this is for only 1 of the 4 credit cards. Would it be recommended to try to work out a settlement? I'm unable to make any regular payment but I could try to see if I could make a final settlement somehow.

 

Would this alert my credit card and potential other creditors? Or is ignoring my best solution at this point.

 

Thanks everyone again, I will be making a small donation to CAG.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Making payments and settling is up to you; HFO will never play fair, however. It’s not in their corporate blood.

 

Nevertheless, this is outside their jurisdiction. And yes, it will alert others. The fact that they are trying to operate outside their legitimate environs would make me fight the feckers tooth and nail! They have broken guidelines already; their actions are seriously wrong; in my book, that renders them in the wrong, as much as any debtor may ever be.

 

But then again, like many others, I have an irrational hatred of all things Turnbull.

Link to post
Share on other sites

All they can do is try and grind you down with empty threats and harassment. Even if they could legally pursue in the US it just would not be economically viable for them, it would cost them many thousands & at the end of the day even if they were successful there still is no certainty that they would ever get any money. They will not know anything about your financial situation or what assets you have.... so they would be taking a huge gamble.

 

If you pay anything to them now or even acknowledge the debt it will reset the Statute Barred clock & you will be back to square one. By what you said in post #1 it's very nearly Statute Barred now as it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would still recommend that you do not contact them or speak to them in any way, shape or form. Just 'hang in there' and ignore them.

 

Your father, on the other hand, should write a letter of complaint to Consumer Direct and Office of Fair Trading with 'Copy to HFO' regarding them contacting him by writing and by phone about your personal matters and then discussing these with him. This is bang out of order and you can add that you want no further contact from them to your family.

 

The 'personal data' they have will be a mix of old data and stuff they can get from the internet and I would mention this in the complaint because they should not be using this as a threat.

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the CCJ, I understand they can go through with this as a default at my last UK address. They obviously know I'm overseas, but I would have no proof of this other than the calls. Would a letter to the DCA stating I am overseas but acknowledging no debt help with this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

DO NOT WRITE TO THEM, they are trying to trap you into resetting the statute barred clock. In their murky world any contact means you accept the debt is yours, especially going through security questions.... they really are the pits.

 

If they do go for a CCJ at your old address they CANNOT enforce this in the USA as their court system is completely different, and they would have a heck of a job explaining why they didn't take you to court in the USA first.....

 

DO NOT WRITE TO THEM, they will eventually give up if they cannot make contact (and they realise that you are abroad, the calls will be costing them a fortune).

 

A UK CCJ CANNOT be transferred to a USA court for enforcement without a lot of questions to the original creditor. They would also have a hell of a job explaining to a court why they brought you over from the USA back to the UK to defend.

 

STOP WORRYING.

 

What you now need to do is contact the Office of Fair Trading here in the UK, the Ministry of Justice and make a complaint, let them know they are leaving voicemails with your manager. This is very much against the OFT guidelines....

 

I am not sure of the USA debt collection processes but am pretty certain this is against anything there too... why not speak to a local government department on this?

 

You won't get into trouble for leaving a debt behind here (a popular myth spread by certain elements of the press) and it could prove to be the ending of this odious company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...