Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Unsettling the applecart?,  I'm going to be direct here, I know how this works , I've been in far worse situation than your relative, and I can assure you , now that there i likely a default in her name, it makes absolutely ZERO difference if she pays or not. Denzel Washington in the Equalizer , 'My only regret is that I can't kill you twice'... It's the same with a default, they can only do it once and it stays on your credit file for 6 years if she pays or not, and as it stands right now she's flushing £180 of her hard earned money down the toilet  so that the chaps at Lowell can afford a Christmas party. As for the SAR this is everybody's legal right, originally under the Data Protection act 1998 and now under GDPR, it's her right to find out everything that the original Creditor has on her file, and by not doing it the only person she is doing a massive disservice to is her self. As the father of 2 young adults myself, they need to learn at some point.. right?
    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO/citicard


bsj
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4640 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 152
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It dawned on me last night that these cretins must have carried out an illegal search on me to get my details.

They tried telling me my chick gave them my details,i know that would'nt happenThe caller also stated he has a recording of the conversation with chick from monday.......how do we obtain that recording under data protection or Freedom of information?.

I'm checking my credit report too,if they searched it it will show.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

An immediate and very strongly worded complaint to OFT and Consumer Direct is in order as they should never be speaking to a third party about someone else's debt irrespective of how they got your details.

 

Think about who has your phone number. Do the credit reference agencies have it from you applying for a credit report?

 

A SAR request to HFO is probably a waste of time in my experience better to hit them with complaints.

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add - get details of time and date of calls, numbers called from, callers name, what they said etc. A quick letter headed 'Complaint' from you to the muppets stating that you were contacted about some else's matter would not go amiss and you can copy this to the relevant authorities. Add that you want to know how they obtained your number and ask for it to be removed from their system. Ask for a copy of their 'complaints procedure' :lol: they will probably ignore this but it is the correct process to follow.

 

Give them '28 days' to reply. You can make a complaint to the ICO but you are supposed to have made a complaint to the company concerned first.

 

'Don't get mad get even'

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add - get details of time and date of calls, numbers called from, callers name, what they said etc. A quick letter headed 'Complaint' from you to the muppets stating that you were contacted about some else's matter would not go amiss and you can copy this to the relevant authorities. Add that you want to know how they obtained your number and ask for it to be removed from their system. Ask for a copy of their 'complaints procedure' :lol: they will probably ignore this but it is the correct process to follow.

 

Give them '28 days' to reply. You can make a complaint to the ICO but you are supposed to have made a complaint to the company concerned first.

 

'Don't get mad get even'

 

Iv'e just been "interfering on your your thread:lol:.

 

All sound advice coledog thankyou ,i'll send a complaint to HFO and ask for their complaints procedure.

 

Iv'e complained to everyone else,it'll back my complaint to the ICO about them.

 

I'm applying for a copy of my credit report to clarify if they searched it.My phone number would be there.

Although i have not applied for a credit report at my current address i guess it would be updated when i changed my address with my bank as it shows on my report.

 

I sent the SAR to citi not hfo,like you say there's no point dealing with them for paperwork.

Edited by bsj
Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter this morning,i think i may of upset them a little not only are they threatening court action they are going to request a warrant of execution:!:.............iv'e sent them my request to be beheaded never did like the idea of the ducking stool........not for a motherhen:lol:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presume this is to 'chick' not you personally. Is it from HFO or Turnbull etc? Probably need you to supply a bit more information or scan it (removing all personal information).

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter this morning,i think i may of upset them a little not only are they threatening court action they are going to request a warrant of execution:!:.............iv'e sent them my request to be beheaded never did like the idea of the ducking stool........not for a motherhen:lol:.

 

They cannot apply for a warrant of execution until they obtain a CCJ, looks like you have touched a nerve.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A warrant of execution will only help if the defendant has:

  • enough goods at the address you give which could be sold at auction to raise money for you; or
  • all the money you are claiming for on the warrant (to stop goods being sold).

Before the court can issue a warrant, the defendant must have:

  • failed to pay the amount he or she has been ordered to pay; or
  • fallen behind with at least one of his or her payments.

This is called 'being in arrears'.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your chick to watch out for a revamped trick of HFOs, they are now sending out cards supposedly from a delivery service saying there are sensitive documents to be delivered and to contact them on xxx number, card posted second class with an SW19 (Wimbledon, Surrey) postmark.

 

I think you ought to watch out for one of these too as they seem to have your details.

 

The company name they are using this time around is FirstPoint Deliveries, they used to use First Logistics Direct...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Presume this is to 'chick' not you personally. Is it from HFO or Turnbull etc? Probably need you to supply a bit more information or scan it (removing all personal information).

 

Sorry coledog,yes to my chick.

I'll gladly scan it up,give me mo to work it out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell your chick to watch out for a revamped trick of HFOs, they are now sending out cards supposedly from a delivery service saying there are sensitive documents to be delivered and to contact them on xxx number, card posted second class with an SW19 (Wimbledon, Surrey)

postmark.

 

 

 

I think you ought to watch out for one of these too as they seem to have your details.

 

The company name they are using this time around is FirstPoint Deliveries, they used to use First Logistics Direct...

I will certainly be on my guard for this tatic,i read coledogs thread about it this morning.

All mail is coming to my address,they don't seem to like the fact i won't give a forwarding address for my chick......so they are upping their game,the letter this morning was very intimidating to anyone that does'nt this DCA and it's tatics.

 

I'm still fuming that they got my details,at the moment it's driving me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very similar to the letter I got with the personal documents attached to it although there are a few more threats inserted in this one - probably because it has not got the house pictures etc attached. Just another example of their nasty underhand tactics/mindgames. Await the replies to your letters - or not, then tell them 'account in dispute'.

 

Have you taken the HFO muppets name off or did it come like that?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only think that they know my chick does'nt live with me and just maybe there is no paper work.

 

It did have a name of contact but i removed it,as chick has been assigned this person to personally contact,i just want to be caustious as i know they read these forums.From what i gather from other threads they probably won't bother to reply to the CCA request.

Iv'e forwarded the letter to trading standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you get no response, go for the second letter and keep at them, you have the full support of the HFO fan club, so just shout for any advice, we are always here.

US President Barack Obama referred to Ugland House as the biggest building in the world or the biggest tax SCA* in the world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking at this letter again it needs to be reported to OFT and the ICO - also the solicitors reg body. For this to have been written by a company run by a solicitor is disgusting and the threats break OFT guidelines big time! It says we 'will' take legal action and we 'will' send in bailiffs when there is no proof of a debt being owed. Bailliffs and attachment of earnings cannot be requested unless a court order is given and the terms broken. If they had added 'we will freeze your bank accounts' we would have had a full set of empty threats!

 

We are currently in the process of reviewing your account and preparing an in depth information dossier on your current financial situation

 

What do they mean by that?

 

HFO may also instruct its solicitors to secure an Order to Obtain Information against you,

 

I have never heard of anyone trying to do this unless it is a crime or massive fraud.

 

the court might consider taking a stern action against you
.

 

The court is there as much to protect the defendents interests as those of these muppets. What are they going to do clap you in irons?

 

You have made payments in the past and it is unlikely that you will be able to raise a credible defence to legal action

 

Have any payments been made to HFO? It doesn't matter as anyone would make payments if they get these threats.

 

I worry about the people who get these letters who don't seek advice about them.

Edited by coledog

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeze bank accounts? When has a DCA EVER been able to do that? Only a court can do that – or a bank!

 

Quite right, Coledog, all these letters need reporting. I wish I could report it for you – but we rely on the victims to do it. Perhaps we should draft specific complaints letters for specific pap from HFO?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with you coledog.......it's letters like this that force people to pay up on debts that hfo know are statute barred too.

I fond the letter very disturbing to tell the truth.It's letters of this nature that push some people to take their lives.

The usual"may" is clearly deliberatly replaced with "will".

I'm gradually going through the fat file chick handed to me,one letter from hfo has alot of writing on it relating to phone calls to chick in 2006.There is no mention of a payment amount.

Chick cannot remember if any payment was made to them.I really do need this info but i don't trust hfo to be truthful regarding payments made to them.

I have so much to sort out,what i have done is CCA all the creditors,not the DCA's.

Hfo are the only ones putting on the thumb screws at the moment,i'm sure others will come out of the wood work.

They are ringing my chick constantly the harrassment letter seems to have been ignored,srtict instuctions have been given not to take their calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot believe they are still sending these letters out. I sent mine to OFT et al with a strong complaint letter but this one is worse and totally inacurate. The poster needs to point out that they are disputing the account and have received no proof that the money is owed. The purpose is to frighten and intimidate the unwary into paying money that they may not actually owe - therefore it is close to extortion. Surely it is obvious to OFT that this breaks their guidelines?

Please support CAG and they will support you.

donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Freeze bank accounts? When has a DCA EVER been able to do that? Only a court can do that – or a bank!

 

Quite right, Coledog, all these letters need reporting. I wish I could report it for you – but we rely on the victims to do it. Perhaps we should draft specific complaints letters for specific pap from HFO?

 

That donkey is a brilliant idea.

I have reported the letter and it's content.

I'm just glad i found you good peoples here,i still worry about the ones that try to go it alone.poor peeps, they must suffer terribly when they get letters like these.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...