Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Electricity charges refunded by mistake, now demanded back - please help!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4963 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I need urgent advice on the following situation, please help:

In April 2009 I moved out of a rented property. Before moving out, I gave final meter reading to the electricity supplier, received the final bill and paid it. Though I moved out, I was still collecting some mail at the old address.

About 6 months later, I received a letter from the electricity supplier addressed to me (at the old address). The letter was saying that I overpaid electricity charges and my account is £800 in credit. The letter was asking me to contact them, so that a check can be issued.

I contacted the supplier and accepted the check, asked them to send it to my new address. I did not go into details as to what charges in particular I overpaid, was just happy to receive this large amount.

Some months later, I received a letter to my new address from LCS (debt collection), demanding the settlement of a debt of around £1000. The amount was made up of £800 refunded and admin charge. There was no previous correspondence from the electricity supplier on this matter - straight from DCA!

After months of correspondence between me and the electricity supplier, the supplier has admitted that the credit was issued by their mistake. But now they are demanding immediate repayment and threatening me with enforcement action.

I don’t mind paying the amount back, but not immediately. Also I understand that if it was the supplier’s mistake, they should not threaten me.

Please advise what rights I have in this case and what enforcement action can the supplier take. At my new property, the electricity is with the same supplier, but the contract is on my wife’s name.

All responses would be highly appreciated.

Many thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think in this instance, at the very least, the supplier in question should give you time to pay or set up an instalment plan. Being as it was their clerical error in the first place and to all intents and purposes you believe you were entitled to it as it was they who said you were after receiving your final meter reading. I would bypass the DCA completely and speak with the supplier and explain that if the money from their error has to be paid back then you will gladly pay them by instalments and not the DCA who will slap on fees or con you into signing things...these people are unscrupulous liars who profit from other people's misery.

 

I don't know if any of this advice will be of any use to you but there will no doubt be more people on here who can perhaps give more info on this.

 

Kind regards and good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear magicmart123. Many thanks for your advice, all comments are invaluable in my situation, as I am completely lost and don't know what to do. Read lots of other threads, could not find anyone in the same situation. So, thanks again. If anyone else has some advice, would greatly appreciiate it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear magicmart123. Many thanks for your advice, all comments are invaluable in my situation, as I am completely lost and don't know what to do. Read lots of other threads, could not find anyone in the same situation. So, thanks again. If anyone else has some advice, would greatly appreciiate it.

 

Your thanks is gratefully received...I am only sorry that I couldn't be of more assistance. I wouldn't hold your breath for help on here though...This forum is a shadow of it's former self and now rather puzzlingly populated by more than a few unhelpful people who seem to delight in petty squabbles about forum rules or some other trivial infraction...I always marvel at those who waste time on such negativity...It's hardly the spirit that this forum was created in.

 

If you don't believe me, just watch the backlash that this genuine observation provokes from these aforementioned unhelpful people. I wish you every success in the resolution of your query but I am not very confident that you will find the help you need on here...which is a pity...As I mentioned in my thread which still remains unanswered after nearly 9 hours...there are a lot of folk who will expend a lot of negativity going against the spirit of this forum. I've had threads hijacked by such people and it never ceases to amaze me the effort they put in to be unhelpful. A sad sign of the times. There are probably half a dozen moderators viewing this now to ensure I've remained within forum rules...I mean really...get a life people...and start helping your fellow man. Best of luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...