Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court summons restons mbna. Help please.


ambercatz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4974 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

We have a DMP with CCCS from sept last year. Recently got a letter from Restons saying if not paid by aug 16th they would start proceedings. Rang them and explained were with CCCS and they just said will they send SOA by 16th Aug, I said they were sending it today (3rd July). I rang CCCS who transfered payments to Restons and sent our SOA.

Today we have received a summons and they are also adding on interest. They received our payment from CCCS in August.

I don't know what to do. I have not requested a CCA as I am of the opinion that it is our debt and we are trying to pay it. I can see no way I can defend it. We cannot get to a court in Nottingham. They have also added a court fee of £75 and solicitors fees of £80.

What should I do-I thought we were slowly clearing our debts and now this has really upset us.

Can anyone help-I am getting really worried and can't concentrate on anything else

Any help gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats an soa?

STOP PHONING DCA's

NEVER EVER DO THAT, demand everything in writing

you wont have to go to notts

just get it transferred to your local court.

type in CCJ in our search and do some reading up.

esp of the threads in this forum.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

SOA is statement of account-all our income and expenditure. Yes I do realise I should have put everything in writing-learning quickly by my mistakes but how do I get it transfered to my local court if I do not defend it? I can see no reasons I can give for defending it.

Really need help here please.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well, you simply have to defend it, to get it transferred to your local court.

Otherwise they will win by default and you lose further money.

This is a vexacious claim as you are on a payment plan, so fight back for F***s sake

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your not going to defend it then there isn't much you can do. Like the rest of us on this this site your struggling with debts. None of us are looking for a quick fix to relieve us from responsibility but find we have to make a stand and fight back.

I had no problems with MBNA and because I had my Credit File marked by another DCA they reduced my limit and raised the interest to 29%. I decided to fight them.

If you don't you lose anyway with added costs.....If you do fight, hey you might even win or come to a better arrangement with your creditor.

You fight and lose and your no worse off anyway.

It's your call, we're just here to help and support you.

 

Series3

If my advice helped you please click my star

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would happily defend it if I could find a legal reason to do so. They seem to have sent me the letters they should have, the debt is mine and I have read that if you don't have a good defence you can get charged for wasting time and that would mean more costs.

If anyone can advise me what I can use as a defence then I will fight it but at the moment I can see no reason I can use-I really wish I could find a way. I don't think being on a DMP counts as a defence. Has anyone else been in this situation who can advise me in any way. I really would appreciate it.

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course being on a dmp counts towards your defence, although you say the debt is yours, which part of it has any illegal costs added to it?

Get a CPR 31.14 request into these buffoons NOW Get a SAR to Original creditor so you can find out what theyve added.

THEN, you file a counter claim for the difference, who, knows theyll probably crawl away after you give them a kick back.

Why would you want them to add to this debt?

 

If you want, you can give me your details, and I will file a claim against you:-D

Sounds like a damn fine earner to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A further query

 

Restons are adding s69 interest to our claim which it looks like they can't do:

3) Interest shall not be payable under this Order where the relevantjudgment—

 

(a)is given in proceedings to recover money due under an agreementregulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974(2);

 

My question is: if we are agreeing the claim how do we go about arguing this-do we dispute this part of the claim or should I just ignore it as it will only be around £20 and they will have to wait years to get it all anyway. Or can we argue it later at a redetermination hearing?

 

Any thoughts appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

AFAIK.

the '91 Order you quote is in re of interest on judgement debts.

s69 County Courts Act interest is up to judgement or date of payment if payment is made before judgement.

 

s69 County Courts Act

'69 Power to award interest on debts and damages

(1)Subject to [F1rules of court], in proceedings (whenever instituted) before a county court for the recovery of a debt or damages there may be included in any sum for which judgment is given simple interest, at such rate as the court thinks fit or as may be prescribed, on all or any part of the debt or damages in respect of which judgment is given, or payment is made before judgment, for all or any part of the period between the date when the cause of action arose and—

(a)in the case of any sum paid before judgment, the date of the payment; and

(b)in the case of the sum for which judgment is given, the date of the judgment.................

.................

(4)Interest in respect of a debt shall not be awarded under this section for a period during which, for whatever reason, interest on the debt already runs.....'

'

Edited by Ford
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...