Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is an ECN the same as a PCN???


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6359 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was recently issued an Excess Charge Notice by Chester City Council under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, for parking in a designated parking place for more than 10 minutes without a valid permit.

 

My first question is: Is a Penalty Charge Notice the same as an Excess Charge Notice? Does it come under the same points of law ie must contain both date of issue and date of contravention etc....

 

I don't have a scanner, but have typed out the ticket below - any advice is most welcome!

 

Chester City Council

Excess Charge Notice

Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984

 

Excess Charge Notice Number: CSxxxxx

Vehicle Registration Number: Vxxxx

Make: Rover

Your vehicle was first observed at 11.07 parked in a designated parking place in Cuppin Street

On 11/08/2006 at 11.07

By parking attendant No: 354

It was again observed at 11.30 and the vehicle was left without displaying a valid Permit

 

AN EXCESS CHARGE OF £40.00 IS NOW PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM THE ISSUE OF THIS NOTICE. FAILURE TO PAY MAY RESULT IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

THE DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYMENT OF THE EXCESS CHARGE. (I thought it was the owner / rk who is responsible?)

 

It is an offence under Section 47(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 for the driver of a vehicle to fail to pay this charge. The penalty on conviction is a fine of up to £500. It is also an offence under Section 46(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to contravene the provisions of the Council's relevant Residents and Designated Parking Places Order.

 

On the back it says:

DO NOT IGNORE THIS EXCESS CHARGE NOTICE

Payment of this Notice must be received within 14 days of the issue date.

 

It then gives details on how to pay and how to appeal. The tear-off payment slip at the bottom doesn't have an issue date on it and nowhere does it say anything about what happens if you don't pay.

 

I think there are several points I can dispute the ECN on but would welcome any guidance..... smile.gif

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks jet force - had already seen your posts on that thread, very interesting reading!

 

Can anybody shed any light on whether the ECN is the same as a PCN?

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

ha ha no it is not the same. A PCN is issued by a council that has decriminalised parking under the 1991 RTA.

An ECN is any ticket issued by a Council which is operating under the 1984 RTA.

Similar but not the same.

If you have an ECN and the ECN refers to any fixed time period, either for payment, or for appeal and the ECN does not have a "date of issue" or "date of offence" then contest the tickets!

The date of the offence is not the date of the notice even if, in most cases, the ECN will be issued on the same day as the offence. A real possibility of prejudice arises from potential uncertainty as to when the periods for payment begin and end.

I am contesting six tickets on this basis.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! six tickets?! go for it!

 

Are there any template letters for these situations the same as there are for the bank charges?

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you! six tickets?! go for it!

 

Are there any template letters for these situations the same as there are for the bank charges?

 

Check the ticket if there is a requirement as to how to request a hearing by the Court.

 

By the time you get a hearing the Judgement of Mr Justice Jackson in Mses & barnet should be available. PCN or ECN will still have to follow the Judgement of the Dates Issues as they both rely on them.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

No details about how to take it to court....

 

Thanks jet force for the template letter, looks good! What are ppls opinions about the fact that the ticket states the driver must pay the charge, not the registered keeper or owner? Is this something that is only covered by the 1991 act?

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have sent the following to the council (thanks to jet force for parts of it!)

 

Dear Sir,

 

RE: PARKING FINES CS19001811 and CS21004203 - Vehicle Reg V954 HVC

 

I write regarding the above Excess Charge Notices which I believe are unlawfully worded. As such, a real possibility of prejudice arises from potential uncertainty as to when the periods for payment and appeal begin and end.

 

There is considerable case law in this country at present regarding the wording of parking tickets. Many councils that operate parking regimes are now finding they have issued unlawful tickets for considerable periods of time. The public have been blissfully unaware that for years, Councils have been issuing tickets that are not enforceable. Part of the problem is that the Councils themselves are not actually aware of their legal responsibilities.

 

I understand that Chester City Council does not have DPE powers, and is thus still operating under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as opposed to the 1991 Act.

 

The Department of Transport have advised that whilst there are two separate acts, the requirements for the wording of tickets is essentially the same. Whether the ticket is a PCN, or an ECN, the tickets must clearly state the date and time that an offence or contravention occurred as well as the date and time the ticket were issued. This allows the owner to:

 

a) contest the validity of the ticket based on the date and time of the offence

b) have absolute certainty of the exact time frame for payment or appeal

 

The tickets issued by Chester City Council do not contain any of the above information. They do not show clearly a “date of the offence”, nor a “date of issue”.

 

The front of the tickets actually state:

 

"AN EXCESS CHARGE OF £40.00 IS NOW PAYABLE WITHIN 14 DAYS FROM THE ISSUE OF THIS NOTICE."

 

Moving on to the back of the ticket we have:

 

"Payment of this Notice must be received within 14 days of the issue date"

 

Without a date of issue clearly written on your tickets, I cannot be sure of the time frame for appeal or payment. Furthermore, there is nothing on the ticket which indicates the time frame for an appeal - and, given that there is no date of issue, would not serve its purpose even if it were printed.

 

In addition, I believe that it is the owner or registered keeper's duty to pay the excess not the driver, under the 1984 Act, as stated on your tickets.

I note that Chester City Council and Cheshire County Council are intending to apply to the Secretary of State to introduce decriminalised parking. I would suggest that the wording on these tickets is reviewed before this system is introduced, otherwise the councils will find themselves continuing to issue unlawful tickets.

I request that Chester City Council revoke these tickets issued to me with immediate effect. Furthermore the Council should consider re-wording the tickets before any concerns over their validity becomes public knowledge.

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, yes interesting point about the "driver" and not the "owner". Presumably if you were not the "driver" the Council would be entitled to know who the "driver" was. Unless you wanted to pass the fines on to someone else you would have to say that you did not know who the driver was at the time. But I dont see that holding up very well!

 

Stick to the issue of the date of issue and date of offence. As previously said the final outcome of moses vs barnet should nail this.

 

Good luck with your case, they have no legs to stand on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all your help jet force....

 

The point about the driver thingy was just me being pedantic :rolleyes: - ie if they want to issue tickets quoting Acts of law then they must ensure they are complying with all aspects of the Act including the wording on their tickets.

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent the above as an email on Sunday - haven't had a response yet.....:mad:

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any comments / advice re the response I've had.....

 

Thank you for your email.

I have considered your appeal but I am satisfied the parking tickets should not be cancelled.

Unfortunately the information you provided in your appeal is incorrect. Firstly, the issue regarding the notification of offence date and issue date only refers to the Road Traffic Act 1991 which can be applied to moving traffic offences.

Secondly, under Section 35A of the Road Traffic Act 1984 it is an offence for the driver of a vehicle to fail to pay an Excess Charge Notice.

Thirdly, whilst Chester City Council welcomes any appeals against Excess Charge Notices, (as stated on the reverse of the ticket), it is not compulsory, under the Road Traffic Act 1984, for any such process to apply.

Please pay each £40 parking ticket within 7 days from the above date.

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone? ;-)

15/2/07 Lloyds TSB number 1 account settled in full :D

20/2/07 5% donation to site :) thanks guys!!

My advice or opinion is offered in good faith but without prejudice or liability. It should not be considered as legal advice. If in doubt, seek advice from a qualified legal professional.

 

"Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate. Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure" - Marianne Williamson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone have any comments / advice re the response I've had.....

 

Thank you for your email.

 

I have considered your appeal but I am satisfied the parking tickets should not be cancelled.

 

Unfortunately the information you provided in your appeal is incorrect. Firstly, the issue regarding the notification of offence date and issue date only refers to the Road Traffic Act 1991 which can be applied to moving traffic offences.

 

Secondly, under Section 35A of the Road Traffic Act 1984 it is an offence for the driver of a vehicle to fail to pay an Excess Charge Notice.

 

Thirdly, whilst Chester City Council welcomes any appeals against Excess Charge Notices, (as stated on the reverse of the ticket), it is not compulsory, under the Road Traffic Act 1984, for any such process to apply.

 

Please pay each £40 parking ticket within 7 days from the above date.

 

This is very interesting.

 

Lets ay the driver did not receive the ticket. ie. it was removed from the vehicle. Does this offence require the Owner/RK to provide the details of the driver?

 

There must be a right to challenge either by appeal or by the right to have the matter heard before a court. If not then the Bill of Rights would apply.

PUTTING IT IN WRITING & KEEPING COPIES IS A MUST FOR SUCCESS

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thirdly, whilst Chester City Council welcomes any appeals against Excess Charge Notices, (as stated on the reverse of the ticket), it is not compulsory, under the Road Traffic Act 1984, for any such process to apply.

 

Please pay each £40 parking ticket within 7 days from the above date.

 

So, why list details of how to appeal on the ticket if they have no intention of even allowing an appeals process in the first instance should someone decide to appeal??? What a crazy set up!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...