Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Resume payments with the debt collectors? You say not to pay dca though do you not? 
    • yes they mostly would be enforceable, but that wasnt the point. even if they get a CCJ the very worst they could have done is get a restriction k which is useless to them. doesnt hurt anything. the CCJ would remain on file for 6yrs yes, but then gone same as a DN. the rest k charge does not show at all. and even so, the idea was to get your debts issued a default notice ASAP, them RESUME payments.. the advise is NOT conflicting, just you don't read things properly or understand.  oh well. dx
    • This is the dilemma I had then and still have it. The bit that stopped me was the post 2015 comments about them being enforceable now in most instances which I feel hasn’t been answered unless I am missing something. the bonus I guess is not all credit agreements now will be chasing me so less people chasing me down so to speak. this is the problem as there is conflicting messaging out there it is hard to plan a strategic way forward 
    • In 2017 my wife was given PIP and I finally, officially, became her carer. In 2019 she was reviewed and we were told it would be done by phone to make it easier for her as she has mobility issues and anxiety. The review was very simple, Has anything changed? No, ok, we'll stay as you are then. In 2022 a second review, this time by phone again but with an awkward given at the end for 5 years. Today, we got a new review letter (I know wait lists are bad, but I dont think the wait will take til 2027 for a decision). We're a bit confused because it's a letter, not a phone call as before. The form is just questions that ask "has anything changed" Now, since 2017, nothing has changed except we had our home adapted via disability grant. This was noted in the phone calls. So we should really write that nothing has changed in the last 2 years. The adaptations have been mentioned in both previous phone reviews, but not in writing so I guess we should bring it up. But we feel that they want us to explain everything as if it were a new claim again... And are worried if we miss something in the original claim or the phone calls she will risk losing part of the award (a 2 point swing could be really bad) It does just say "has anything changed?" But in dealing with ESA prior to getting PIP, answering the question asked "has your condition worsened or improved" at a review process with a simple "no, I'm still the same" somehow led to ESA ending and needing appeal. So just want a bit of guidance. How much detail is needed? Is minimal ok? Or should we be blunt with the fact nothing has changed, and bullet point the things she struggles with in each section?   I know the obvious thing is to just explain it all,but over 10 years the sheer amount of times the poor woman has had ESA or PIP stopped/refused just because something was missed out in their report, or they felt it meant a new claim should be made, or that they judged her healthy because we missed a tiny thing in our forms. During COVID it finally seemed like it was all just going to be smooth, especially with the phone reviews and the 5 year reward, but here we are. We just want to make sure we have the least chance to trip ourselves up, but making sure we have what is expected if you get me? I wish I still had a copy of the forms from 2017, because I could just verbatim copy them and add in about the adaptation, but (ironically) we lost our photocopies we kept of them when the house was being adapted
    • might of been better to have got them all defaulted 2yrs ago as we carefully explained before then you'd already be 1/3rd there and your current issue would not be one.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent employment problem, please help.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5014 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

lol thanks guys :)

 

by the way- whenever I tell work I cannot attend the OH meeting they keep replying to me with meetings at a later date...can I tell them that I will not be attending full stop ? I am seeing my GP today.

 

cheers

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Say this to them.

 

Thank them for their concerns and say that you have an appointment with your GP. Also, say that you feel that their continuous pressure to attend work is exacerbating your condition and would they kindly desist contacting as you will contact them regarding attending work appointments as soon as your GP recommend that you are in a fit condtion to do so.:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you might also consider asking them to contact you by post only, because of your fragile mental state. I used to dread getting phone calls from HR and they just wound me up and made me worse. They had no idea about stress-related or mental issues or how to handle someone with those problems.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must go to your Gp and tell him everything. Ask yourself, and those closer to you the question: "Am I the same person I was before this started?" If they tell you you have changed - you have a problem brewing. The sciatic pain? Well if you have no slipped disc and haven't pulled anything recently, this is likely to be caused by you being tense, sitting in one position for overly long periods whilst sulking and weeping (come on, we all do it in these situations!). The only true cure for sciatic pain is to keep on walking, and if you do this it will lift your depression a bit as well. And watch your temper, because the slightest thing might cause a sudden association to what has happoened and you might end up clobbering someone in a red rage.

 

And yes, if you ring up the DWP - google - its an 0845 number, they will advise you,

 

I warn you now, you will get £64.40 a week. That is all. And it makes no difference that you have a job. You can still get ESA. At about week 13 you will get called to the dreaded ATOS medical, which you may well fail, most of us do, then for 6 months more, whilst you appeal, you will be pegged at the £64.40 a week still. It is a nightmare.

 

However, in my case, it was a nightmare worth seeing to the end.

 

I've always loathed a bully, never been the target of one til the ripe of age of 45! If someone came up to you in the street and belted you round the head with a baseball bat, what would you do? You'd hopefully recover and have the swine prosecuted because they caused you an injury. What happened to me and what is happening to you is very similar, albeit the bat is invisible. You've had a shock and all your bits have gone belly up (brain bits I mean!!). This is called a psychiatric injury. Gp's I am informed by my own, are recognising this more and more recently and a good psychiatrist will get you on the road to recovery. This will probably be at the local community hospital if you have one.

 

I reckon you want to forget about moving in with the girlfriend (because if you are ill this will pile more stress on you and you'll end up rowing and so on). Why not have a word with your parents about this and see how far they will support you - my parents have been invaluable even at the ages of 80 and 81! We've all had a rough time financially, but they were as determined as I was that I will not let this drop - I dug my heels in and 18 months later I am in a position to go for the jugular. If there is anyway you can do likewise, please do, but understand the bumpy ride you are in for.

 

Wish you all the luck in the world. Don't let people push you around like this - and stay away from the workplace. If they want a meeting they can arrange one at your home. With one of your parents there or both as a witness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys sorry for late response, didn't see my e-mail notifying me of the replies.

 

Thanks for all of the advice so far it is much appreciated.

 

After declining to attend 2 OH meetings, my manager has this morning left a voice mail for me.

 

The message thanks me for making them aware I cannot attend the OH meetings. It goes on to say that a meeting has been arranged for me on Monday to attend the next meeting regarding the disciplinary.

 

My gut feeling is that if I attend on Monday they will notify me that the disciplinary has been upgraded to level 3 and that I am being dismissed for gross misconduct.

 

If I do not attend, will they hold the meeting without my presence and dismiss me? Do they need to write to me before I attend any further disciplinary meeting? Bare in mind I've barely had anything in writing throughout the whole process.

 

Thanks

N

 

 

EDIT: I am seeing my GP at 4:50 today which is the earliest I could get. Unfortunately work will be closed when I'm out and the appointment is on Monday

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay just received e-mail from work. I'm not sure if it's reccomended to post such things here, but this is the e-mail with names etc removed:

 

Just left you a message on your mobile, also tried to ring your home number we have on record, but it doesn't accept withheld numbers.

We would like you to attend an investigatory meeting on Monday 6th September at 3pm. You need to wait in reception and a representative from HR will collect you from there. The purpose of the investigatory meeting will be to discuss the additional information that has been collected following the formal disciplinary hearing on 22 July 2010 where you made reference to sending these sort of emails for a period of approximately 18 months.

You are entitled to bring a representative to the meeting and that should you wish to do so you can contact ******** on, tel. *******.

 

Whilst we appreciate that you are currently not in work due to sickness we are Disciplinary policy,

"We reserve the right to continue our investigations and formal action during your absence, depending on the circumstances."

This meeting will take place regardless of whether you attend or not, as we wish to progress this matter.

 

Please can you confirm as soon as possible if you are able to attend.

 

 

The worrying part of the email is where they say I will have to wait in reception for a member of HR to collect me. This is how the other staff were treated when they were suspended - I've not been suspended and as far as I am aware my security pass still allows me to access the building. This indicates to me that they are treating me now as if I am suspended?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, hope your hanging in there!

 

I'm no expert but if I was in your shoes I would ask for the meeting to be held in a neutral place outside of work as this is the place that is causing your sickness.

 

If you stress to them that you are willing to try and move forward on this with them but you need their support in doing so.

 

I would also speak to HR in writing if you don't fancy a phonecall and ask how when you have had a letter detailing the level of action can this be upgraded without your presence. A investigatory should be finding facts, but they can not do that without you???

 

Hope the back off a little!

 

Satch

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, this is just confusing me now.

 

After receiving the first e-mail I've since received a second from a member of HR.

 

The second meeting invites me to the investagatory meeting, but on a totally different date/time (13th sept at 3.30pm).

 

I contacted work and spoke on the phone to the employee representative who has been very nice and helpful to me through the procedure. He spoke to HR on my behalf and they said that they would resolve it with a third e-mail to clarify. I have received nothing since and work is now closed.

 

On another note I saw my GP this afternoon and she has advised that I do not attend the meeting on whichever date it is due to health. I'll email work back to tell them to hold the meeting in my absence. However the way they are I very much doubt they'll send any minutes or new evidence to me in writing.

 

Thanks

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. They sound a bit of a shower frankly. If they don't tell you in writing, it will go against them at any future ET. But it might behove you to send an email asking for written feedback, Then if they don't reply, they won't be able to provide a copy of an email.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening everybody

 

Bit of an update and some advice if you would please :)

 

Last Friday was my last post. Work e-mailed me to tell me I had to attend an investigatory meeting. They e-mailed me twice stating two different dates. I e-mailed back to say my GP had advised me to not attend and asked them to hold it in my absence, whenever it was.

 

Saturday morning I receive a special delivery letter confirming the meeting was to be held today (6/9/10).

 

Before my next point, I'd like to add something: The company I work for is a large insurance company. They are very particular as you'll understand about Data Protection. We were not allowed to e-mail customer information outside of the company as this is not a secure method of contact.

 

Today I received an e-mail from the manager who held the meeting. I have been suspended from work on full pay pending further investigation. The email had attached a copy of the minutes from the meeting detailing what was said and showing the evidence. There is no mention of the level 2 disciplinary being changed to a level 3. It also stated that a copy of the letter would be posted to me.

 

 

Now my questions are:

 

1.) The email says I am suspended on full pay. Previous e-mails before I was suepended told me that my pay would reduce to 50% after being off sick for 3 weeks and then stop fully after 6. I have been off work for 4 weeks now, so should I be on 50% pay or full pay?

 

2.) Is e-mail classed as a secure method for them to be sending me these things? It has my personal information, details of the disciplinary and the evidence in there. Bare in mind I specifically asked my line manager not to give out my personal e-mail.

 

 

Thanks a lot

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...