Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
    • Danny - point taken about the blue paragraphs.  Including them doesn't harm your case in any way.  It makes no odds.  It's just that over the years we've had judges often remarking on how concise & clear Caggers' WSs have been compared to the Encyclopaedia Britannica-length rubbish that the PPCs send, so I always have a slight preference to cut out anything necessary. Don't send off the WS straight away .. you have plenty of time ... and let's just say that LFI is the Contract King so give him a couple of days to look through it with a fine-tooth comb.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problems with PAYPAL as a seller on Ebay


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Maybe not exactly the same situation but I believe the following process may work in many cases.

 

Hi, its taken a while but they have finally given up, and are calling of the dca received an email this morning saying as a goodwill gesture they are re crediting my account. It is without doubt through info I have got from this site and others like it that I have managed to chase them, I have often felt like giving up, it takes up so much time and effort. However I believe I know now how to go about it in a way that will minimise the stress.

 

1 When you sell a pricey item get the money out of papal quickly, you never know who is going to try and fleece you.

 

2 As soon as the dispute starts get your letters ready, because it is more than likely you will loose, do not waste your time with emails.

 

3 As soon as they find against you send a recorded delivery letter to their Compliance Officer,(SEE PREVIOUS POSTS FOR ADDRESS) complaining about the fairness of their dispute process, pr-empt them by stating that you have no interest in their user agreement, and that they are obliged to follow the laws of the uk no matter what their user agreement says. Also point out that as they are signed up to the Financial Ombudsman scheme they must offer you the opportunity to take that option, finish the letter by saying that if after their own investigation they still intend to pursue you, you would like a 'letter of stalemate' from them to enable you to take your complaint to the ombudsman.

 

4 They will reply eventually (executive escalations) stating that an investigation will take place which could take 8 weeks, they will probably get back to you in 4.

 

5 While this is happening you will probably be threatened by the paypal minions who seem unaware of the activities of executive escalations, they will probably set the debt collectors on you.

 

6 As soon as you are contacted by the debt collectors, do not give them any information, they will hang up, but continue calling you every day. Email the executive escalation officer (with this lot you will get a name and they do reply to emails) stating that you are concerned that Paypal have referred the case to a Dca, while a legitimate investigation is taking place and are they aware of the fact that the Financial Ombudman takes a very negative view of these sort of harassment tactics.

 

7 Its time to wait now, do not get flustered by the debt collectors, pick up the phone, allow them to introduce themselves and calmly state that you have no intention of confirming anything with them and that they should contact you in writing.

 

8 Unless we are talking about a large sum of money and a very strong case (on their part) i.e you really did sell someone a pile of rubbish, you will win.

Because firstly they do not want the Financial Ombudsman involved (it will cost them over £300 as soon as that happens) and secondly if you show that you are not intimidated and are willing to face them in court, they will never allow it to get that far because they know they will loose.

Hope this helps, all this info is out their and on here. I have just put it together in an order that worked for me, if anyone wants letter templates, addresses pm me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only trying to help, and while I understand your concern over the credit rating, I will be asking Paypal, to include in their letter,a statement that they will make certain that any change in my credit rating is reversed. Whatever happens sorting my credit rating will be easy compared to the first bit. What would your advice be? Pay up and let them get away with again.

 

larest email from Paypal,

Dear xxxxxxxx,

 

Thank you for your email dated xxxxxxxxx. Please find below our

response to you which was sent via post on xxxxxxx. Please

return the affidavit we sent to you with your signature so that we can

resolve the issue for you.

 

I have now requested that collections are ceased on the account so that

you should not have any further contact from EOS Solutions in relation

to this matter.

 

our letter to you:

Thank you for contacting us in relation to the Buyer complaint case

(xxxxxxxxxxxxxx).

 

Mr. xxxxxxx, following a review of this case, we determined that the

buyer, Mr. xxxxx, was eligible for a refund as the item was returned to

you. We understand from you that the item returned by Mr. xxxxx was not

in its original condition.

 

As a goodwill gesture, if you send back to us the Affidavit sent with

this letter, filled by yourself and stating that you destroyed the item,

we will credit your PayPal account with £xxxxxx1 GBP.

 

We sincerely regret that you had this negative experience when using our

services and that you chose to close your PayPal account.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

xxxxx

Executive Escalations

PayPal

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two sides to every dispute. We're only hearing one of them.

 

Basically, you are advising people to make sure any money held by them is put out of reach in case of unspecified problems. However, the real issue is to make sure you play the game and give them no opportunity to accuse you of non compliance. I've managed 14 years as a customer and never had an issue where I was disadvantaged, but several where the actually assisted in getting my money back where. Would otherwise would have lost it.

 

They are most certainly not perfect, but your actions are self-defeating as they would indicate your affairs are being handled ina less than honourably way, and their actions an equal reaction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolute naive rubbish, there are many ebay sellers who have been totally conned, through Paypals rubbish dispute process , and you can infer what you like, I was not inviting comment on whether or not I had any right to challange Paypals conclusion, only pointing out a possible course of action for anyone in a similar position, who does not wish to roll over. Bully for you if you have had no problems, you had better hope your self satisfied righteous attitude does not comeback and bite you one day. Tell me what will you do when after legitimately selling something your money is refunded to the buyer and you are sent back a broken or even completely different item or perhaps nothing at all. You have no idea what you are talking about, try doing a google search on Paypal charge backs and disputes and you will see the scale of the problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tell me what will you do when after legitimately selling something your money is refunded to the buyer and you are sent back a broken or even completely different item or perhaps nothing at all. You have no idea what you are talking about, try doing a google search on Paypal charge backs and disputes and you will see the scale of the problem.

 

 

If you don't like Paypal or disagree with the terms of the Paypal User Agreement, don't use Paypal. Simple.

 

I would not and do not use Paypal as a seller and would count my blessings if I did, it being my own free choice to do so.

 

When a buyer cancels or rejects the goods and is therefore entitled to a refund, the buyer is not obliged to return the goods, except that the buyer agrees to do so.

 

8)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Naive rubbish?

 

Funny it wortks for me, because I read the rules and work within them. If your complaining that people who do not and are somehow 'caught out' by their rank stupidity. that's PPs fault?

 

Dream On!

 

Play their game - or don't, it's your choice. It's difficult not to if you want to stick with eBay, but that's a decision the user need to reach. Not bitch about it later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a lesson to learn from the German experience.

 

German sellers are positively averse to Paypal; they see no need to pay an extra fee; they think it a lot of trouble for nothing, nor are the buyers so keen, the result of which is that eBay did not yet go so far as insisting that Paypal has to be offered on eBay.de. They know that they would shoot themselves in the foot if they did; the members would rather quit than put up with it, so they don't.

 

In the UK they rather get the better of the members because the members are daft enough to let them, and also because the enforcement authorities let them down so badly by failing to provide the protection that the law says they should.

 

For the past ten years the OFT has acted as if it owned a stake in eBay. Over and over again they turn a blind eye to eBay's offences instead of prosecuting. It reeks of corruption.

 

:roll:

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Last of the Mohican" is clearly unable to read and understand PayPal's terms of reference for doing business - as such, if there's an ignoring to be done, it would be his (hers?) scurrilous and wildly inaccurate attempt at humour. (whilst still wet behind the ears!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Last of the Mohican" is clearly unable to read and understand PayPal's terms of reference for doing business - as such, if there's an ignoring to be done, it would be his (hers?) scurrilous and wildly inaccurate attempt at humour. (whilst still wet behind the ears!)

 

 

Touch a nerve did we? :)

 

Buzby, I kicked the legal $h1t out of a DCA last year pretty much on my own and won a couple of hundred pounds compensation. Not sure that makes me "wet behind the ears" or not.

Try not responding to every thread on CAG about the biggest ongoing fraud in Europe (a.k.a PayPal (Europe) S.A.R.L. ) with either jibes or negativity and you might not stick out like a sore thumb.

 

And now, I shall take my own advice and ignore you. Bye... :)

In knowledge lies wisdom

 

Mo - not even a bar-stool lawyer, but I'll help where I can...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nerve? Not in the slightest!

 

To accuse without proof is one thing - but whilst you are entitled to yor opinion, making misleading statements that you make no attempt to justify is the ultimate of cheap shots, but to what end? Proving that consumers should ignore the rules and make up their own?

 

How intelligent is that?

 

It's obvious to me, and no doubt everyone else. I dislike PayPal's OTT fees, but it is my choice to use it. If you don't like it, that's your choice - but by all means lose your credibility if you like, always assuming you had any to start with!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...