Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Bookmakers use betting on political events to entice new customers, and say it is growing.View the full article
    • nope  and  neither dx
    • Ok Thank you DX will do just that . will keep you up dated.
    • dispute it with whichever cra provider is now showing it. simply state the a/c is from 2015 and was defaulted (date) and should not have re appeared. probably getting ready to sell it on. dx
    • Hi Caught Shoplifting at John Lewis - Retail loss Prevention/Other shoplifting allegations. - Consumer Action Group Thanks a lot for commenting this experience of yours. I do understand this might be something that you are not willing to talk about anymore but the same exact scenario happened with me today at John Lewis. They took my name/ address/ a picture of me holding a signed banned letter. the only questions I've got are... will I be contacted by the police will this be recorded as police caution or criminal record?  I would really really appreciate if you could let me know how it went.  I am so so so ashamed of myself and am really making changes in my life I feel like I've lost myself for a period of my life but anyways it would be really great to hear back. Thanks 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hauled to court, forced to pay £1,500 and branded a criminal...for drowning a grey squirrel


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

 

When a bird lover managed to trap one of the grey squirrels raiding his nut feeders, he decided that drowning would be the most humane way to dispose of it. What happened next landed Raymond Elliott with a bill for £1,500 and, even worse, a criminal record. A neighbour tipped off the RSPCA that he had submerged the animal in a water butt.

Mr Elliott, a 58-year-old window cleaner, insisted that the squirrel died 'almost instantaneously'.

 

However a vet said the process would have taken three minutes, so Mr Elliott was taken to court accused of causing unnecessary suffering to an animal. The landmark case sets an important precedent for killing grey squirrels, which are classified as a non-native invasive species, and could pave the way for hundreds of other prosecutions across the country.

The RSPCA warned that many common methods of killing grey squirrels and other pests could now fall foul of the law, and said the only humane way to dispatch them would be to take them to a vet for a lethal injection - at a cost of up to £70. Mr Elliott, from Branston, Staffordshire, was prosecuted under the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

 

Read more: First case of it's kind: Man told to pay £1,500 after being found guilty of drowning a squirrel | Mail Online

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Whilst I don't agree with him being charged, doesn't everyone know that drowning is a horrific way to die??

 

If he was actually concerned with being humane then a hefty brick on the head would do it instantly (she said, realising she now sounds like a seasoned squirrel killer:D).

 

Anyway, make sure you stay away from his nut feeders UK! You'll only draw attention to yourself by being the only squirrel doing a dad-dance whilst having his dinner:D

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My neighbours are pests. They pose a health risk to others as they are violent, verbally abusive, damage people's property frequently, they leave debris everywhere, on other people's property as well as their own, the back street, the front street, some of said rubbish is soiled nappies.

 

As we have established them as pests and a danger to others, do you think I'd be able to get away with giving them a quick whack over the head?

Mungy Pup

 

I want to live in a world where chickens are free to cross the road without their intentions being questioned. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it came down to the same issues, a £1500 fine would still probably be worth it as your property will rise by more than that! :lol:

If in doubt, contact a qualified insured legal professional (or my wife... she knows EVERYTHING)

 

Or send a cheque or postal order payable to Reclaim the Right Ltd.

to

923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE

 

 

Click here if you fancy an email address that shows you mean business! (only £6 and that will really help CAG)

 

If you can't donate, please use the Internet Search boxes on the CAG pages - these will generate a small but regular income for the site

 

Please also consider using the

C.A.G. Toolbar

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it came down to the same issues, a £1500 fine would still probably be worth it as your property will rise by more than that! :lol:

 

:lol: Very, very true lol

Mungy Pup

 

I want to live in a world where chickens are free to cross the road without their intentions being questioned. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Firing squad would have been better:

 

squirrel%2520with%2520machine%2520gun.jpg

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that waterboarding mimics the sensation of drowning but non-fatally.

maybe this would be enough to persuade the squirrel not to come back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that waterboarding mimics the sensation of drowning but non-fatally.

maybe this would be enough to persuade the squirrel not to come back.

:-)

I find what he did slightly disgusting and horrifying.

But having watched road wars/cops in crisis or whatever it was on TV tonight and the guy who attempted to kill his wife by ramming the passenger side of his car at full speed into a railing, getting let off with attempted murder and being done for dangerous driving instead (points and a ban), I think the consequences for the squirrel basher are slightly over the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that waterboarding mimics the sensation of drowning but non-fatally.

maybe this would be enough to persuade the squirrel not to come back.

 

:lol::lol:

Time flies like an arrow...

Fruit flies like a banana.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

This bloody lunacy. You catch a squirrel, you dispose of it. You are not allowed to relocate it anywhere. it has to be put down. Now where are the instructions of how to dispose of the squirrel humanely. Will the RSPCA pick it up from you if you phone, not likely. Do you keep the squirrel captive until you can get to a Vet's?

 

Being branded a criminal is farcical. I would love to this on a TSA application into the States or elswewhere. " I drowned a squirrel. The law states it has to be put down."

 

I have respect for the RSPCA, but this makes it a laughing stock, the money spent investigating this case and bringing it to Court. No comparison to the toe rags who ran down my puppy deliberately and nothing done when complained to the police. RSPCA didn't want to know about it. Maybe prosecuting squirel executioners is easier.

 

If you catch a squirrel, let me know, I have some tasty recipes. No I promise it wont be boiled alive...possums are vermin in Middle Earth, tasty little critters when crumbed and fried.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...