Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see jenrick has stuck his head up with them, and I'm sure this wont faze their nasty rhetoric one wit-less UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report UK growth since 2010 has been lacklustre and largely driven by immigration, says report | Economic growth (GDP) | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Resolution Foundation report suggests parties are dodging the economic challenges facing the country   Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it Immigration: how 14 years of Tory rule have changed Britain – in charts | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Net migration is more than two and a half times the 2010 figure despite a string of Tory pledges to reduce it    
    • Will get them done asap My job changes week to week so at the time I didn’t know. 
    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cabot/morgan Claimform Morgan stanley card debt **struck out**


Hadituptohere
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2982 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bet a criminal solicitor would like to get his teeth into this one. These rascals need seeing-to.

 

 

If only we could afford one and and one was available, im finding it hard to juggle and scared of dropping the balls all over the floor, thanks god for this site.....

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 523
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

 

Post up a draft applic. over the weekend if you can & we can all input if necessary. :)

 

 

I wish I could.. the first weekend working away for months and its probably at the most critical point, sods law..

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just found the post stating you had an unless order in place ...
Oops - I missed that too.

 

Even better, though - no form filling, no fee, maybe no hearing.

... the first weekend working away for months and its probably at the most critical point, sods law.
No worries - as fg suggests in #275, just write a brief letter to the court. Head up with the case Nº & title and say you wish to bring to the court's attention that the claimant has failed to comply with Judge Wotsit's order dated 32nd Octember 2010 (identifying the relevant part/s of the order) and ask that the court exercises its power under CPR 3.4(2)© to strike out the claimant's statement of case, with a costs order under 3.4(3). Then drop it into the court office and get a receipt - best is the court's date-stamp on a photocopy of your letter. Job done. If time is short, you could ask the court if they'll accept your letter by fax. No need to copy to Cabot or Morgans.

 

Then you can think about your counter-attack (see #271). Read Durkin very carefully to see what evidence you'll need to prove that erroneous CRA reports caused real financial loss.

 

Have you checked your household insurance for legal expenses cover?

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

... with a costs order under 3.4(3).
... but don't forget your N260 for costs!

 

Chuck in everything that you've spent in connection with this case, starting from the first intimation of court action. Include all time spent reading up, looking at websites, downloading info, travelling, postage, copying and all fees paid - see the "N260" link in #271 for more info. If you haven't worked it all out in detail, use estimates and say "subject to correction".

Edited by Meldrew
Wrong quote extract

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Meldrew, gladly Job called off till next weekend after a wasted trip, Just checked our home insurance and it states Family Legal Protection 50000.00

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Meldrew, gladly Job called off till next weekend after a wasted trip, Just checked our home insurance and it states Family Legal Protection 50000.00

 

Hadituptohere

 

Don't be too upbeat on this one. It's worth a phone call but sometimes insurance will only pay if you inform them at the start of the action. BTW if they do agree, you don't have to accept their sols (whatever they say!!) you can choose your own.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldnt the action only start upon me being the claimant? As you have said its worth a phone call, thanks for the heads up on which sol too im sure they would try and get me to use there prefered sol.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wouldnt the action only start upon me being the claimant?

 

:confused: I thought you were defending an action hadit?

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Other aspects to consider are:

 

  • Counter-claim against Cabot for publishing inaccurate and potentially libellous personal data - Cabot would have to prove the debt reported to CRAs actually existed. Ask for general damages following the Kpohraror case - £5k in 1996 should be approaching £10k now - see para.117of the Durkin judgement.
  • Recover everything you paid to Cabot - in whatever guise - on the basis that only the creditor (including any proper assignee/s under CCA 74) is entitled to repayment under the credit agreement. Include compound interest at the rate/s you were charged - probably in the region of 15-25% p.a.
  • Misrepresentation by Cabot pretending to be entitled to payment,

... and you'll have that villa on Barbados before you knew it.

 

"Aha", they'll say, "you do owe the money, 'cos you spent on the card - gotcha!". True, but you certainly don't owe it to Cabot. "Well, the fact that you paid us £50/month for years means you accepted we were the creditor and entitled to repayment". But you only paid 'cos they untruthfully led you to believe you should - that was coercion. I bet a criminal solicitor would like to get his teeth into this one. These rascals need seeing-to.

sorry foolishgirl this is where I was considering using the insurance cover :oops:

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - get it. However if you issued this as a counterclaim, I think the insurers would say it was part of the claim made against you & that has already been in progress some time.

 

Of course, nothing to stop you issuing a new claim against them when you see the outcome of this one & that may be covered. You're not going to save anything in fees as you would still have to pay to submit a counterclaim at this stage & if it progresses on its own merit (i.e. Cabot claim dropped against you) I think you would also be liable for a hearing fee.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

... BUT - whatever you do, check all the relevant facts first - its easy for a case to fail on a misapprehension or misreading of something significant.
Had a peek back over this thread, and thinking ahead a bit...

 

Just a quick clarification hadit: is the Barclays/Cabot Europe agreement in #252 meant to be the Deed of Assignment between Providian and Cabot UK referred to at 4.1 of Morgans' response in #198?

 

If not -

 

  • how & when did you get the #252 doc?
  • where is the Providian/UK DoA Morgans refer to? - haven't seen it posted (unless I missed it).

 

This would become important if the non-compliance strike-out fails and you need to fall back on the strategy in #260.

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Meldrew

 

Yes this is the document sent marked exhibit D in the CRP 18 request for further information reply. just going to post Morgans witness statement for checking as it mention's cabot uk and financial a little.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness statement

 

cabotwitnessstatement.jpg

 

cabotwitnessstatement2.jpg

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Witness statement

Is that it? Only 2 pages? No signature? No Statement of Truth? Or maybe the rest of it is irrelevant/repetitive?

So, within the Cabot Group, Cabot UK is intended as the creditor and debt owner, and Cabot Europe merely UK's debt collector. Europe then uses Morgans for the heavy legal stuff on behalf of UK (I'm sure this must be common knowledge to many here).

 

In that case,

... they could well have shot their foot completely off by releasing this document.[the #252 agreement, not the WS]

... well & truly amputated!!

I bet Cabot Group is really just one bloke in a cupboard somewhere who keeps swapping hats with different names on (to remind him who he's meant to be at that point), and getting himself thoroughly confused in the process.

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol yes there was one more page that contains the Statement of Truth that is it. It has been proved on this site that the different members of staff within cabot do have several job titles depending on which hat they have on that day.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a peek back over this thread, and thinking ahead a bit...
I also see that at 3.0 of the amended PoC in #160, Cabot UK says it "is and was at all material times the Assignee of the debt incurred by the Defendant on her Goldfish Bank Bank Limited Credit Card Account ("Goldfish")". What's that to do with the Providian/Monument/Barclaycard A/C? And - more importantly - how did Cabot find out about your gender reassignment?

 

More confusion?

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to the court done ready to hand deliver along with the N170 & N260 tomorrow, I've also copied Document D and included that, in the letter ive also reminded the judge of the none compliance of the court order.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also see that at 3.0 of the amended PoC in #160, Cabot UK says it "is and was at all material times the Assignee of the debt incurred by the Defendant on her Goldfish Bank Bank Limited Credit Card Account ("Goldfish")". What's that to do with the Providian/Monument/Barclaycard A/C? And - more importantly - how did Cabot find out about your gender reassignment?

 

More confusion?

 

More Morgans incompetence :D....and ive just checked on my gender and its still there and is perfectly fine....

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, within the Cabot Group, Cabot UK is intended as the creditor and debt owner, and Cabot Europe merely UK's debt collector.

 

... well & truly amputated!!

 

Cut off at the armpits, meldrew, 'cos in the WS it states that Cabot UK have no employees so who signs as assignee of the debts??

I also see that at 3.0 of the amended PoC in #160, Cabot UK says it "is and was at all material times the Assignee of the debt incurred by the Defendant on her Goldfish Bank Bank Limited Credit Card Account ("Goldfish")". What's that to do with the Providian/Monument/Barclaycard A/C? And - more importantly - how did Cabot find out about your gender reassignment?

 

 

Goldfish???

 

ive just checked on my gender and its still there and is perfectly fine....

:D:D:D This could prove interesting in court!!

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

...and ive just checked on my gender and its still there and is perfectly fine....
:lol::lol::lol: Edited by Meldrew
Misquote (again!)

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter to the court done ready to hand deliver along with the N170 & N260 tomorrow, I've also copied Document D and included that, in the letter ive also reminded the judge of the none compliance of the court order.
Do you need to include Exhibit D (I'm guessing it's the #252 doc?) - what would you use it for?

 

Surely your argument for the Unless order strike-out should be that Cabot UK failed to let you see the docs that you'd specified, by 5 May (per #235)? It seems from #208 that you wanted to see -

(i) the CCA (Cabot/Morgans previously said they didn't have T&Cs) and

(ii) the NoA (which they copied to you in Nov 09 - see #143).

That's all. Exh.D would only be relevant if you'd asked to see the DoA.

 

If you hadn't asked to see Exh.D I think producing it at this stage would only cloud the issue. You'd only need it if the strike-out fails - to show that it's not the Providian/Cabot UK DoA at 4.1 in #198.

 

BUT - the strategy in #260 relies on you accepting Exh.D as a valid DoA, thereby making the CCA agreement unenforceable.

 

Food for thought, at least, 'cos only you have all the relevant docs and can see the full picture...

Oh dear, why do these things always happen to me - I don't beli...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I should have explained my letter, On the 6th May I wrote to the court explaining that morgans had failed to repond to my request to view original doc's as per court order dated 19th April, so the letter I have draughted reminds the DJ that they have failed to comply with the court order but also includes new evidence found 'Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd Issued claim but under disclosure via CPR18 request for further information morgans have produced Exhibit D as there DOA which clearly shows its between Barclay's and Cabot (Europe), I was going to enclose the document D as evidence for ease for the judge, my letter then requsets strike out via CPR as advised.

 

Hope this makes some sense

 

Hadituptohere

Edited by Hadituptohere
poor spelling (thats been spotted)

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ive just found my letter dated the 6th May I sent regarding the failure to comply with the court order, in that letter ive already requested a strike out under CPR3.4,2( c) and costs to be summarily assessed.

 

So I guess a phone call in the morning to see whats happening regarding this letter if anything?

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with meldrew hadit - think you may be in danger of overloading & confusing a poor DJ's mind. Keep it simple - ask for your strike out for non-compliance of court orders & if that fails, bring this lot up as part of a thorough defence, ws etc.

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok cool ill ring the court tomorrow for an update, ill hand deliver the N170 as its due tomorrow also. as for thorough defence and WS they have already gone in but didnt include the recent evidence found.

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...