Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Info / help reg fire & capquest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5025 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, sorry if I'm in the wrong place but since finding this site my laptop has been down & I'm viewing from my phone & it's kinda confusing.

 

Basically i split up with my partner 4 years ago & have recently been contacted by two companies regarding credit card debts that didn't get settled when we broke up.. One I paid up at the end of last year after receiving threatening letters but there is £99 remaining this company is called capquest - the second is a company called fire but fortunately found your site before paying them anything.. The problem is the amount of calls (anything from once to 5 or 6 times a day) I don't have any letters from either company so every time they call I ask for them to write to me with details & I will reply / respond in writing but they keep saying they have written & won't send anything recorded delivery as it's against company policy so I'm just going round in circles. I've now started to say I don't give my personal details out over the phone so they will have to contact me in writing but they are now getting arsey on the phone.. I don't have any account details or information on the debt so don't want to write to them first as I have nothing to reference to. I'm just looking for advice or help really as I don't know what to do next besides ignore the calls but I'm worried about my credit rating etc.. It's really starting to wind me up.

Thanks so much for your time & for your work on this website, it really has been priceless to me already. D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well sadly thats the idea of what they do, but the good thing is thats ALL they can do.

 

DCA's have NO LEGAL POWERS

 

they are just the same as you and me. you and me could be one.

all they can do is send threat-o-grams

 

and another useful point.fire and cabot are the same , they are in the same building , prob just the sec changing the letterhead in the printer.

 

you are quite correct not to converse on the phone well done

 

they'll soon write then play their cards

 

till then ignore them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, sbaolutely correct not to deal with them on the phone.

 

However, it does sound as if you're getting into some sort of conversation with them. When they ring ask who's calling and if they say Fire etc simply say "In writing only" and put the phone down. They will eventually get the message. Even though they can't discuss your account under Data Protection laws they will try to intimidate you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for response already, it's only down to reading threads on this site that I now know not to speak with them & have started to request for the matter to be dealt with by letter. I really can't thank you guys enough. D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well dont hit my scales you'll break them.

 

 

 

 

thats what cag is here for

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They won't / haven't written to me since I've been requesting them to for over 2 months now, should I write to them anyway as I'm sure it won't be difficult to find an address or do I need / want them to write to me first?

Also is the next step opening up a dispute / requesting them to send me a copy of the original contract agreement etc? Sorry if I'm asking silly questions.

 

Thanks D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could CCA them both

it maters not you have ack'ed it on the phone

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Daisy, as the guys here say, avoid phone contact.

 

Send them the telephone harassment letter by Recorded Delivery - don't sign it, just print your name.

 

You should also send them the CCA letter, again by recorded delivery, enclosing a postal order for £1 which is the statutory fee. Again, no signature, print your name.

 

If they continue to hassle you by phone, make a note of the dates and times of the calls, as they are going against official guidelines and you can make an official complaint to OFT, Trading Standards, your MP, etc.

 

When you receive a response to your CCA request, you'll know where you need to go from there.

 

Templates can be found here:The Consumer Forums - Debt collectors

 

Good luck!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry whats the golden rule.............!!!!!!!

 

a cca request does not need one

if they are chasing you they should know this info!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I didn't clock the fact that you'd had nothing from them in writing.

Don't phone them. If you have no letters, no account number and no knowledge of the alleged debt, you could always start with this:

 

By Royal Mail Recorded Delivery

Name/Address:

 

Date:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us by telephone, regarding an account which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves. You have, to date, not provided me/us with an account number or indeed, full details of the alleged debt.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the CPUTR 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading's Guidance on debt collection, which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. AND in not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to Trading Standards and also inform the Office Of Fair Trading of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Edited by Halibutt

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok guys so letters / £1 postal note etc have now been sent this morning to both companies, I thought i'd save myself time by grabbing templates of other letters while there (the one regarding not signing the the letters & the follow up one to send after their time is up etc etc)

 

I will keep you posted & let you know how i get on lol

 

Thanks guys. D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so a company called Cabot have responded to the letter I sent to fire, is this the correct proceeding as all my correspondence / evidence is with fire? They have also returned my postal order (funny this one actually turned up because they'd sent 10 letters to me (apparently) and That's why they were calling me every day!) it says they do not currently have this information on file but they have requested it from the original lender & anticipate they will be able to provide this within 12 days.

Do I continue to stand by & wait? Is this all normal & correct action by fire / Cabot?

 

Thanks once again guys. x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

As has been previously mentioned, Cabot and FIRE are one and the same. Different monkeys at different desks.

 

This is the standard response from them once a CCA request has come in. Just sit back and wait for them to respond. I have been waiting 20 months so far :)

 

The beauty is that while they don't supply any agreement, they can't hassle you either.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh if only it was that simple :mad:

 

You will remain on their books while they attempt to get an agreement and your credit file will remain the same. They will say that as you have had the money (even without your signed agreement) they can mark your credit file.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...