Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for posting up the required details and well done for apparently not revealing the identity of the driver. I am assuming you are the keeper? The depth of ignorance of the parking companies is absolutely amazing. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 is the law relating to private parking and allows those rogues to be able to transfer the charge from the driver [whose name they do not know] to the keeper after 28 days . This is dependent on them complying with the Act. So many of the don't and Alliance is no different. It would help if we could see what you appeal was and to post the back of the PCN as it is lacking so much of the wording necessary to make it compliant so that in your case only the driver is liable to pay the charge. And of course just entering the ANPR arrival times means that they have failed to specify the parking time which is a requirement..  Because the car park was so busy you had to drive around for quite a while before finally finding a place to park which is when the parking period may  actually begin. The poor dears at Alliance have not grasped that particular part of the legislation as yet. To be fair the Act has only been in place for 12 years so one must make allowances for their stupidity . We shouldn't really mock them- but it is fun. You weren't to know but the chances of winning an appeal against Alliance and the IPC is around 5%-and that is high for them. If they allow you to cancel they lose the chance of making money and they would have had a field day when you were there with so many people being caught overstaying because of the chaos in trying to find a parking space then trying to pay.  Your snotty letter could go something like this- Dear Cretins, Yes I mean you Alliance. After 12 years one would have thought that even you could produce a compliant PCN. Did you really think I would pay you a penny extra considering the time I wasted trying  to pay with  long queues at the parking machine, then trying to get a signal to call Just Park. On top of that you then had the cheek to ask for an additional £70 for what dubious unspecified pleasure? You must have made a killing that day charging all those motorists for overstaying because the queues to pay were do long and even walking to pay from the over flow parking fields takes time. And yes I did take photos of the non existent signs in the fields so please don't give me the usual rubbish about your signs being clearly visible. Oh yes that £70. Please tell me and the Court whether that charge included VAT and if it did, why am I being charged to pay your vat? I am sure the Judge would look carefully at that as well as the Inland Revenue. The truth is you had no reasonable cause to ask the DVLA for my data given the chaos at your car park and I believe that you therefore breached my GDPR...................... I expect others will give their views as well.          
    • opps this is going to get messy then if they don't refund. you should never keep util accounts in credit.
    • https://www.rac.co.uk/drive/news/motoring-news/new-private-parking-code-to-launch-in-the-uk-later-this-year/ The newly created gov petition 'Immediately Reintroduce Private Parking Code of Practice' is from Stanley Luckhurst, the 85-year-old old Excel Parking took to court. Excel lost the case and the pensioner's been campaigning for regulation of PPCs since this unpleasant experience. https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/24085471.gerrards-cross-pensioner-takes-nightmarish-private-parking/ I would urge anyone on this forum who supports the petition statement "We believe the private parking industry is trending toward anarchy and must be brought to order by re-launching the Government Code immediately" to sign and share it. 168 signings at 4pm today https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/660922 If the gov new parking code is not launched before parliament dissolves (for the general election) then the legislation is at great risk of being shelved. And we'll be stuck with ATAs new joint code which does not address motorists issues such as a cap on parking charges, debt recovery or an independent appeal process.  https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/wash-up/
    • It was mostly taken from credit within the account left over from excess direct debits over the past year. 
    • not looking very hopeful then... there is usually an account comms or manual intervention notes where call  operators have typed notes.... not in the SAR? dx    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft chasing Vodafone bill-am happy to pay Vodafone.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5050 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, ive just had a card come through the post, no stamp, asking me to call the moorcroft debt representative. After calling moorcroft ive been told i cant set up a payment plan over the phone but that i have to meet with the said rep in person. Infact he has to come to my house?Could someone please advise me if this is correct practise or if they are doing this just to push me into making larger payments. Please Help!Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no reason why Moorcroft cannot set up a payment plan directly.

 

Their "agent" obviously doesn't want you to do that as it will cut him out of the loop and he won't get commission. So it's in his interest to tell you such nonsense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
Hi, ive just had a card come through the post, no stamp, asking me to call the moorcroft debt representative.

 

After calling moorcroft ive been told i cant set up a payment plan over the phone but that i have to meet with the said rep in person. Infact he has to come to my house? Rubbish, ignore what they have told you. They cannot invite themselves to your home without your permission.

 

Could someone please advise me if this is correct practise or if they are doing this just to push me into making larger payments.

 

Please Help!Thanks

First things first, no more contact with Moorcroft by phone. Ignore what they have told you on the phone ... yes, it is all designed to scare you ... they have no powers to visit you at home, none at all ... I will be back in a moment with what to send them. Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Forget what the Moorape said to you, send them this letter (DO NOT SIGN IT print your name) by recorded delivery.

 

Dear xxxx

Account Ref xxxx

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing. I have noted your repeated attempts to contact me by telephone over the past few weeks/months and these have been duly logged by time and date.

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

 

 

Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Now, if we can have some details about this debt, what it is eg loan/credit card/overdraft?

 

BTW, you can also report them for using that hand delivered card (as you said no stamp was on it) to your local Trading Standards via Consumer Direct; they get a lot of complaints about this kind of debt collection practice. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really am quite willing to pay it back but when they posted that note and after the guy on the phone wanting to visit me "for a few minutes and needing a signature" i wasnt too keen on going down that road

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been beaten to it. Exact letter I was going to post.

 

They should not have pushed a card through the door telling you to ring a debt collector anyone could have got hold of it. In fact your partner may hae got hold of it and may not have known you owed any money.

 

Get them reported the more people that report things like this the more chance there is of getting it stopped.

 

DG

I have no legal training my knowledge comes from my personal life experiences

Please help keep the forum alive by making a donation

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
I really am quite willing to pay it back but when they posted that note and after the guy on the phone wanting to visit me "for a few minutes and needing a signature" i wasnt too keen on going down that road
Like I said, they have no rights to visit you at home. If you are more than willing to pay it back as you say, then you will have to negotiate with them in writing and offer them an affordable amount - NOT what they think or you think is reasonable but what you can actually afford per month. However, I would still report that card to Trading Standards, they are usually very interested in knowing what cold callers are potentially operating in their patches.

 

"for a few minutes and needing a signature"
And for what pray tell, there is no credit agreement attached to a mobile phone contract so I can't quite see why they are asking for a signature of you. However, it is a DCA ... so who knows what they will tell people on the phone and make them believe it.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
f he doesn't leave just call the police. They sometimes ignore letters because they are stupid.:grin:
No, they just need diagrams that go along with the letters to ensure they understand the wording 'naff off'. :D Maybe, ones with flashing blue lights to indicate what will happen if they don't leave when requested to. ;)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i did :) thank you for your extrememly helpful words. Ive just printed out the letter and hopefully they will recieve it before they turn up again and really push my father over the edge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

The letters are threats. It's highly unlikely anyone would turn up. If anyone does so, then keep the door closed on them. Don't answer. Treat like any other cold caller or door to door sales person you don't want a bar of when they come knocking or ringing. Or hand them that letter if you want if they do (in the unlikely event) send what they eloquently call 'local representatives'.

 

To put it another way, 'sling yer hook'.

they will recieve it before they turn up again and really push my father over the edge

So, are you saying they've already been to your house and done this previously?

 

*waves to guests viewing*

Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they must have done to push the note through the door into the hands of my dad . It was in an envelope marked "private for tanya "

Edited by TanyaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus
yes they must have done to push the note through the door into the hands of my dad . It was in an envelope marked "private for tanya speck"
Just checking. It could have come through the post also via the postman. Hope that's not your real name you posted there ...

 

Anyway, there isn't much else that can be suggested, asides from reporting them for using a card in this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no its a nickname :)

There was no adress there. Well im going to be away for the weekend so if they do turn up the nicely formed letter is in the hands of a relative to hand over. Ive researched a few things- if you welcome them into your home they visit frequently as they please, is this true? i mean i by no means am going to invite them into the living room for tea but do they have the rights?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you do decide to pay it just bear this in mind. The chances are they've botched your credit file. If you check your CRA and find it's botched I'd be insisting they remove ALL data re that debt before you agree to pay. They'll tell you they can't but they really can. Why have a dodgey CRA file for 6 years. Everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had Halifax tell me that they were sending a representative to my house to discuss my situation with me and after reading various posts on the forum it became clearly obvious that they cannot do this, they have absolutely no right to step one foot on your property and if they do without your permission then they are trespassing.

 

I telephoned Halifax and told them that their representative was not welcome and should in no uncertain terms visit my premisses.

 

I never did get the visit;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Yes, they are purely threats. However, as you will also have read in some posts ... very often they do chance their luck/arms or whatever appendages they use and have shown up. Hence the letter, as it leaves a papertrail for use later on if necessary. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, they are purely threats. However, as you will also have read in some posts ... very often they do chance their luck/arms or whatever appendages they use and have shown up. Hence the letter, as it leaves a papertrail for use later on if necessary. ;)

 

Agreed, do everything by letter. Unfortunately I wasn't in the best of moods at the time and had not seen the letter immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The letters are threats. It's highly unlikely anyone would turn up. If anyone does so, then keep the door closed on them. Don't answer. Treat like any other cold caller or door to door sales person you don't want a bar of when they come knocking or ringing. Or hand them that letter if you want if they do (in the unlikely event) send what they eloquently call 'local representatives'.

 

To put it another way, 'sling yer hook'.

So, are you saying they've already been to your house and done this previously?

 

*waves to guests viewing*

 

Moorcroft are one of the debt collectors that DO make house calls

 

 

if they are at the door then not answering is more likely to alert/worry others in the house (and neighbours) than not answering the door.

 

further- if you do not answer the door then they will simply assume you are not in and then they will call again

 

i would suggest that if they DO call- either before or after being told not to- that you should have no fear of answering the door and that by "dealing with them" head on first time you will prevent repeat calls

 

these are not bailiffs- will not push their way into your house - and will not make threats.

 

simply politely tell them that you will not at any time discuss the matter in person and that all communication should be in writing only.

 

In 99% of cases that will do the trick- and it will also serve to show you that there is really nothing to fear from "debt collectors" calling at the house and this experience will empower you.

 

of course if you are ultra nervous then dont!- get someone else to do it for you

Edited by diddydicky
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...