Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Santander


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4967 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

i am wondering if any one can help me this is my first time on this forum. I am trying to sort out a debt my daughter has with Santander from a credit card, she did not tell me about it as she was frightened, i got her to contact Santander and the woman she spoke to just confused her with financial jargon. I spoke with the woman and asked what options she could give her, option 1 agree to pay £170 for 3 months, option 2 do an income and expenditure form which i asked for i also asked for a statement covering the inception of the account to date as my daughter has never had a statement i was informed that she would send me the last 3 months statements. We recieved the income and expenditure form but it is required to reduce payments and we do not want this never recieved any statements, i wanted to get my daughter set up to a regular monthly amount. I wrote back to Santander on her behalf and explained that the income and expenditure form was not what we wanted as she has never recieved a staement i asked for a full breakdown so i could see how this debt has accumulated and agree a plan of repayment. All she recieved were 2 letters a day apart informing here of her arrears and total amount outstanding which is increasing at an alarming rate then 4 days later a letter came from Viking collections asking here to contact them to make full payment or to discuss a payment agreement. I am at a loss at what is the best course of action, because Santander never responded to her letter requesting a stament from inception we dont know what charges are being applied to the account as none are shown in the letters. Should i send a CAA letter to Viking and Santander any help greatly appreciated Geoff

Link to post
Share on other sites

send them a CCA request to see if they are entitled to collect this debt & if it's enforcable. If they fail to provide it within 12 working days from receipt, or the CCA is unenforcable you can legally withold any payment until they do. Send it recorded delivery enclosing a £1 postal order. When you get a reply, scan it & remove any identifying details and post it back here where we can have a look at it. We'll advise you from there;

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:- Account No: XXXXXXXX/Your Reference Number: XXXXXXX

 

This letter is a formal request pursuant to s.77/78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. I require you to provide me with a true copy of the credit agreement relating to the above account, together with any other documentation the Act requires you to provide.

 

I expect you to comply fully and properly with this request, within the statutory time limit. You are reminded that should you fail to comply with my request, the provisions of s.77 will apply.

 

If it is your view that you are not the creditor, s.175 of the CCA 1974 applies in the case of a simple assignment, and places a duty upon you to pass this request to the creditor. In the case of an absolute assignment, you are a creditor as defined by s.189. If you contend that you purchased the rights but not the duties of any agreement, you are reminded that s.189 of the Act is clear that an assignment is of both rights and duties.

 

Your attention is drawn to ss.5(2), 3(b),6 and 7 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUTR). I enclose a postal order in the sum of £1.00, which is the statutory fee. Note that these funds are not to be used for any other purpose.

 

If you intend to send a reconstituted copy of the CCA you must declare the reason why it has been reconstituted and if the original exists and in what form (microfiche) etc.

 

If you are unable to comply fully and properly with this request, you should confirm this in writing at the earliest opportunity, and certainly within the statutory time limit for compliance, and return the fee.

 

Furthermore, with regards to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

You are reminded of the following under Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008.

 

Trading Standards can bring about a prosecution if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under contract, he or she:

 

(a) harasses the other with demands for payment which by their frequency, or the manner or occasion of their making, or any accompanying threat or publicity are calculated to subject him or his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation;

(b) falsely represents, in relation to the money claimed, that criminal proceedings lie for failure to pay it;

© falsely represent themselves to be authorized in some official capacity to claim or enforce payment;

(d) utters a document falsely represented by him to have some official character or purporting to have some official character which he knows it has not.

 

I am of the view that your harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Further to this if it is your intention to arrange a call from your 'Doorstep Collectors', I note that there is only an implied license under English Common Law for certain people to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.).

 

Take note, I revoke license under English Common Law for you, or any of your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so without my permission, you will then be liable to damages for a tort of trespass. You would also be conspiring in a trespass if you sent someone to visit me nevertheless. Any trespassers you attempt to send therefore will be dealt with accordingly.Be further advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded.

 

(Print in red optional addition)

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully **Edit to suit**

 

(Print do not sign signature)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

thanks for your help just a quick question the CCA you have sent to me the wording in red should i delete all of this as she has not had any telephone contact yet, also i want a copy statement from the inception of this card so i can see how the debt has accumulated is there another line that i can add and send them a £10 cheque.

 

Thanks Geoff

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can omit that, send it to Viking.

 

To get a full breakdown of the charges and the history of the a/c you will need to send a SAR to the Data Controller at Santander; http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca this costs £10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi geoffcjb

 

Has you daughter got any Penalty Charges on the Credit Card, also has she been mis-sold PPI on the Credit Card. Both worth checking out and both claimable with interest. You can get at least 6 years worth back.

Statements are fairly easy to get hold of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi geoffcjb

 

Has you daughter got any Penalty Charges on the Credit Card, also has she been mis-sold PPI on the Credit Card. Both worth checking out and both claimable with interest. You can get at least 6 years worth back.

Statements are fairly easy to get hold of.

 

All that will show up with a SAR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi

sent Viking the above letter included a £1 cheque off my dad also wrote to Santander sent them A data protection act letter asking for all information held including all statements sent them a cheque for £10 pound off my dad, received a letter from Santander relating to the Viking letter relating to the CCA on the copy of my letter written in ink CHQ £1. I am positive i did not get the letters mixed up feel like they are trying to mess me around if i did make a mistake and i'm sure i didn't the cheque was made out to Viking no mention of this. I will now have to send the letters again should i reply to the Santander reply to the CCA or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...feel like they are trying to mess me around...

Interesting 'whistleblower' post on another forum that may help explain this... http://www.moneysupermarket.com/community/forums/p/39097/debenhamssantander-cardsviking-collection-service-166329.aspx

 

In the second paragraph it says "We pretend we've already sold it on and call ourselves Viking.". They go on to add things like that "...if we think your lying..." and then "When you call us, be nice" !!!

 

I thought it was a strange, but funny, post by one of their employees anyway... I can't figure out how paying and getting a refund bring the account up to date, but maybe that is how their accounting system works and we should all do that... ;-)

 

Forfot to add - don't believe a word of what a Santander/Viking employee says anyway - the start of the third paragraph sates "All credit agreements under Santander Cards are legally enforcable" and we know that's rubbish!

Edited by hillards
add last para.

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

thanks for all your help i have received print outs from a computer screen regarding all transactions on the credit card account it shows transaction date, transaction type, amount and original amount, as this is a print out from a computer screen there is other information that one would have to scrooll left to see they have not sent me this none of the print outs show were atm withdrawls were made. Will i have to send another £10 to request this information or can i request it from the original £10 as they have not sent me all required information held as required under the SAR i sent them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you are disputing the debt, they had no right to hand it over to a collection agency and can be reported for doing so. Tell the collection agency to hand it back as you are dispuiteing the debt and if they don't report them to TS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi again since my last post my daughter has recieved statements we still dispute, also she has had a debt recovery letter sent to her from Moorcroft debt recovery i sent them a CCA letter, then she recieved a final notice letter from Viking collection service who never responded to the CCA we sent them. Both letters show different outstanding amounts should i write to Viking again and if so what do i write, and just thought i would put this in she closed here Santander bank account months ago and has just recieved a letter from them telling her that her account is overdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...