Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Overpayment on Jobseekers ... citizens advice any good?


sotty13
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5080 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

CAB are their to help and are usually on the ball with this sort of thing. will know all the rules and regs that apply and will tell you best course of action. dont sign anything from DWP untill youve read it and checked it with CAB, DWP will try and get you to sign statement admiting you know you did wrong and then chase you for cost, interest and recovery of £4000. they may also try for a fraud charge so stick to it been an honest mistake and point out that they should have made this clear to you from outset.

I was told life was supposed to be one long learning curve.

Mines more a series of hairpin bends.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they may also try for a fraud charge so stick to it been an honest mistake and point out that they should have made this clear to you from outset.

 

It is made clear at the phone call stage that an income based claim does need to know about savings.

 

There's an entire section of the phone call that asks in turn if the customer has a current bank account, savings account, ISA, money saved for something, money from a redundancy payment and so on. If the answer to any of these is yes then it prompts the advisor to ask how much is in that type.

 

The entire section is prefaced by a long statement "we now need to know about Savings, this includes any money, savings, investments and property in the UK or abroad that belongs to you, and this is because the benefit you wish to claim may be affected by these".

Link to post
Share on other sites

U seem ti know your stuff. You work for dwp ???

 

I do, I'm one of the people who takes the 45 minute call to make a new claim, so I must read out that sentence anywhere up to 15 times a day. I don't know what happened on your call but the list that follows is pretty extensive and includes the catch all category of "any other savings" so you should have had the opportunity to declare the £15,000 at that stage.

 

As I said I don't know how that part of your call went or whether you'll be prosecuted as I have no experience of that side of the benefits system. I just wanted to make it clear to anyone reading the thread that the opportunity to discuss precise amounts of savings does exist right from the start of the claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Incapacity benefit is contributory based thus is not affected by capital, and tax credit aside from not being administered by DWP requires interest on capital in excess of £300 to be declared - different benefits have different conditions attached to them dependent on the law.

 

However, income based JSA and contributory based JSA also have differences, which brings me to some questions in light of what CAB have told you and in view of the fact that you were not getting HB or any other benefit except tax credit. You may not have been overpaid at all, or it may be that you have been overpaid but it may not be recoverable. This is what you need to establish - I can help you establish this with a few questions.

 

Which type of JSA were you receiving? Contributory based or income based? Did you declare your capital when asked about it?

 

Privatehudson, is our OP entitled to a printout of the form and what was entered at the outset, or would they have it already?

 

HB

 

It used to be the case that the information taken in a telephone claim was sent to the claimant to sign. In any case, he'd be entitled to a copy under section 7 of the data protection act, if he required a copy.

 

If there is an overpayment of £2000 or more caused by failure to disclose, the case will be referred to departmental solicitors for prosecution (even when the money is re-paid). The FIS can look at your bank records without your knowledge or consent.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm.

 

Unfortunately a lot of the advice I could give is in hindsight to be honest which is of limited value and may just add to your worries. Perhaps the CAB may be able to argue that you misunderstood the questions but that may rely on whether the advisor who took your claim over the phone asked them in full or not. Calls are recorded so the DWP would be able to check that if necessary for you.

 

Ultimately I don't really know much about the Fraud Investigation side of things so perhaps Erika can provide more advice on that.

 

if say i had no savings and had the flat when i 1st claimed ( i never ) its only an income surely if you make money on it???? what would you live on....?
When people own a property and are renting it out we take details of both incoming rent and the outgoings on the property. As it is considered capital we usually also take information about when it was bought, how much it is worth, how long the lease is for, how much the mortgage is and so on. I presume they use this information to calculate whether you have an income or not.

 

With regards to your last remark that is the government's point, if you can live off what you have they will expect you to do so. They'll still provide financial support for a limited period (usually 6 months) if you have paid into the system through Class 1 National Insurance Contributions and meet the other criteria such as actively seeking work. Even that can be blocked or reduced by some types of regular income such as a pension though.

 

The system is designed to check not just if you are eligible for benefit but also whether you need it. We can argue whether this is fair or not but those are the rules.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...