Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You need a back up plan. If you believe that redundancy is very likely, start looking at other employment options.  Don't leave it until you have been made redundant before looking for new employment. I regularly speak to people who have been made redundant and about mental health. Those who have a positive plan, get into employment quickly following redundancy and manage to maintain their finances. Those who don't have a plan, decide to accept redundancy and a period of unemployment. They end up in a downward spiral, with redundancy money spent, debts accumulated, mental health decline and difficulty finding new employment.  
    • Interested observer here as I'm in a similar situation. People become conditioned into seeking and maintaining a perfect credit score/file, but if your situation is that you're unlikely to obtain further credit for the foreseeable future anyway due to your other outstanding debts, then tanking your credit file now won't make a difference other than you've took back control of your finances.
    • Firstly, I would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter. Since my last post I have received a reply from Plymouth Council Insurance Team concerning my wife’s accident (please see enclosed letter and photo of the offending Badminton post) which they deny any responsibility for the said accident. I feel that the Council is in breach of their statutory duties under the following acts: The Leisure Centre was negligent in its duty of care and therefore, in breach of the statutory duty owed under section 2 of the Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 (the Act) to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all their employees, and others who might be affected by its undertaking, e.g. members of the public visiting the Leisure Centre to use the facilities. The Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999 that requires employers to assess risks (including slip and trip risks) and, where necessary, take action to address them. The Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations (PUWER) require the risk to people’s health and safety from equipment that is used at a Leisure Centre be prevented or controlled. I would like some advice to see if my assumptions are correct and my approach to obtaining satisfactory outcome to this matter are accurate. Many thanks   PLM23000150 - Copy Correspondence.pdf post docx.docx
    • Talking to them does not reset the time limit, although they will probably tell you it does, they'd be lying. Dumbdales are the in-house sols for Lowlife, just the next desk along. If Lowlifes were corresponding with you at your current address then Dumbdales know your address. However, knowing that they are lower than a snake's belly, you would be well advised to send them a letter, informing them of your current address and nothing else. Get 'proof of posting' which is free from the PO counter, don't sign it, simply type your name. That way then they have absolutely no excuse for attempting a back door CCJ.   P.S. Best course of action, IGNORE them, until or unless you get a claim form......you won't.
    • A 'signed for' Letter of Claim has been sent today so they have 14 days from tomorrow... Lets wait and see what happens but i suspect judging by their attitude they wont reply 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

EasyJet Flight cancelled - ATC Strikes?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5071 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

On may 26th, I was supposed to take an EasyJet flight from Barcelona to Paris but it was canceled at the last minute. We were offered a re-route on the next day, but it caused us to miss our connecting flight and we had to buy a new ticket (for a total of more than 600£).

 

At that time, I was told that the flight was canceled for "crew issues", i.e. they didn't have enough crew members to operate the flight. When we got back, I've contacted EasyJet to get a refund because this reason does not qualifies as "extraordinary circumstances" as defined the European legislation and I wanted to receive the monetary compensation defined by the law.

 

The reason that they now state is that "The flight was cancelled due to a crew issue, they had used all of their flight hours as a result of the ATC strikes and so were unable to operate the cancelled flight. This is extraordinary circumstances. ATC restrictions prevent aircraft operating to within 5 hours of the original schedule." and that "The strikes were initiated by French Air Traffic Control over pension reform proposals."

 

However, I was not aware of those strikes at that time and I'm not sure of how I can verify that. I searched the news archive and I didn't find anything. Is it possible to verify this with an independent source? Is there anything else I could do to receive a monetary compensation?

 

Thanks.

 

As a side note, does anybody know if it's possible to make a complaint to the Spanish authority by email? All I found was the postal adress in Madrid:

 

Reclamaciones - Derechos de los pasajeros - Ministerio de Fomento

Link to post
Share on other sites

There were ATC strikes announced in France from 1700hrs on May 26th to early morning on 28th May but that's not to say that is what caused the cancellation.

 

I'm sure the airline would want you to believe it was cancelled due to strikes but do a bit of research and find out if other airlines flew that route or similar at about the same time.

 

Anyway, if you google 'france ATC strike 26 may' it quickly brings up references to this (and you don't even need the French translation, Honeybee!! ;)).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I actually speak French but I didn't find any info on Google originally. Here's a link that I found:

 

French ATC Strike 26th and 27th May

 

I don't know if we can say it's a credible source ;)

 

How would I be able to check if other flights were departing at the same time? I could not find a archvied schedule on the airport's website.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, here's what I could find:

easyjet.jpg

 

From this, it seems that other airlines had no troubles flying at that time.

 

Is there any way to prove that the cancelation was not related to the strike? What should be my next course of action?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, here's what I could find:

easyjet.jpg

 

From this, it seems that other airlines had no troubles flying at that time.

 

Is there any way to prove that the cancelation was not related to the strike? What should be my next course of action?

 

Thanks.

 

If you proceed down the small claims legal route on this, you don't have to prove anything, the burden of proof is on the airline.

 

Your next course of action is down to you. You can either let sleeping dogs lie or you may decide to go down the legal route. EZ will not pay your compensation without you taking them to court. You might like to consider whether you have access to legal expenses cover via your household contents insurance policy which would indemnify your court and legal fees and provide access to professional legal advice on the matter.

 

If you do not have this cover, you could decide to take the DIY route via moneyclaimonline which will eventually end up with allocation to the small claims track in your local county court.

 

 

Do some research regarding EC 261/2004 and what you are entitled to claim, the minimum is 250 euros for the cancellation plus any expenses under article 9 of 261/2004.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Mrs Hobbit

Now I know why I never fly with these airlines...having trouble lately with the broomstick...

 

I woud take them to Court and get to explain things to the Judge. This is staffing issue and an internal matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...