Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ - defence due - please help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3789 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Interesting that> MBNAlink3.gif has stapled 3 pages of T&Cs to my application forms!!

 

Sounds par for the course & I suppose they are claiming that they were part of the original agreement too?!

Any knowledge I possess or advice I proffer is based solely on my experiences in the University of Life. Please make your own assessment of legality, risks & costs before taking any action.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 320
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sounds par for the course & I suppose they are claiming that they were part of the original agreement too?!

 

They haven't actually claimed anything but I'm guessing that by stapling the t&cs to the agreement that is what they are trying to suggest! I have my own answer for this anyway for when I have to do my witness statement but will keep that quiet for now in case anyone may be browsing the thread... ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Important thing is also what they have said in there letter as if you eventually disclose the enclosures, you would also need to disclose the letter from MBNA. If from the content of original executed agreement and t&c's you can show that they are not linked, good result.

R

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Optima do like the SJ application as it helps them to avoid some difficult and more in depth questionning. I believe even if they tried to have it moved near them the court would make sure it stayed near you, however if that wasn't the case I think you could request it to be closer to you anyway. If in doubt give the court a ring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Well, no surprise - Optima have come back and basically listed the points in my letter then pretty much ignored them all, trying to hide behind the CCA and even having the nerve to send me copies of the Brandon and Carey judgements (proving they didn't actually read my letter that thoroughly!)

 

I can't post the letter onto my thread til Tuesday as I don't have access to a scanner until then, but Optima have basically given me til Wednesday 27 October to withdraw my defence or they will proceed to summary judgement.

 

I thought it had to be allocated to my local court before they could consider SJ but I'll call the court Monday and see what's what - ut's all still in Northampton at the mo which is nowhere near me!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically it is in default the day you miss a payment .... i.e. being 'in default' is = being in breach of contract

 

However if you are talking about reporting to CRAs etc then the creditors would have MASSIVE problems, if you complied with the default notice, of 'pretending it didn't happen' which is what is supposed to happen.

 

IMHO they should not report until past the remedy date, but the default date could be any date from the missed payment onwards

 

jmho

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks GH, understood.

 

It's just there seems to be confusion between Optima, their client and myself as to the default date. MBNA told me one date was the date the account was terminated (which was the date the CRAs were advised), the default notice was dated a few days after the date MBNA told me the account was terminated and Optima seem to think the date of default was the date of the default notice!

 

Any thoughts please?

 

PS - hello guest viewer on this thread!! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting! So looking at point (20) in their response Optima are confirming that the agreements were terminated on 9th April even though in point (3) they state that the DNs never expired until 26th April.

 

Even if the remedy time on the DNs was sufficient, how can you remedy that which is already terminated :???:

 

Or am I missing something here?

 

M

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if the remedy time on the DNs was sufficient, how can you remedy that which is already terminated :???:

 

Or am I missing something here?

 

M

 

Well, that's what I was thinking - am I missing something????!!! The fact that you have raised one of the very points that struck me relieves me greatly!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, that's what I was thinking - am I missing something????!!! The fact that you have raised one of the very points that struck me relieves me greatly!

 

Their reference to Brandon makes it even funnier! lol.

 

M

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Instructions for pursuing Chipmeister:

 

Step 1. Place foot firmly on floor

Step 2. Read Brandon and whoop for joy

Step 3. Load gun ready to fire off @ debtor in Court

Step 4. Write a reply to debtor

Step 5. relax arm with gun with smug grin on face

Step 6. realise quite what you have just written

Step 7. release trigger ......

 

Cost of litigation up to that point £2000

Cost of the reply £25

To be a fly on the wall when the "You wrote WHAT!!!" question is asked ......

...... PRICELESS!!!

 

:D

If you find my advice helpful - please click on my scales

<<<<<< - they're over there!

Well, it's a funny black star now ...

The small print - any advice I give is freely given on the understanding that I am a layman and am not legally qualified in anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Evening all

 

I'm so glad I found this thread. I have mine own for a mate of mine but I just need clarification on something if anyone could help me out.

 

My mate had a payment agreement with MBNA for a short settlement of £4k down from £16500.

 

He agreed to make payments until the 26th October 2010 then on that date he would pay the outstanding amount of £3500 as a full and final.

 

He called up on the 26th October 2009 to make the payment and was advised that it wasn't possible as the account had been defaulted and charged off.

 

He did an SAR and they actually charged it off on the 30th October 4 days after the payment date.

 

Then he recieved in the post dated the 9th November 2009 received 11th October 2009 a DN advising him the had until the 26th November 2009 to pay the arrears and no further action would be taken.

 

This is the icing on the cake though as they actually defaulted his account on the 30th Spetember 09. A full month prior to his final payment date.

 

Still making sense?

 

He had a few letters from the in house monkeys Debt Clear asking him to do a deal and remortgage his house etc etc but he ignored them due to the fact that the DN caused him not to get his remortgage and move to a smaller house a clear all his debts.

 

The a about a week ago he got a call and when he picked up it was a recorded message asking him to call an 0141 number quoting a ref which he ignored.

 

He's been getting calls from a mobile and when he picks up it goes dead but today it was an outfit called Allied International Credit demanding he pay. After he explained the situation they asked him to sent all the relevent documents but I've told him not to.

 

Is it me but how can he retify a default when it's already been issued and account charged off?

 

Help anyone

 

Thanks

Scrapper Coco & Mate 8-)

Edited by Scrapper

"I just want to make people silky-smooth!"

 

Scrapper vs MBNA Partial Settlement Success. Saved £13,000 :lol:

Scrapper vs Barclays Bank Plc PPI Reclaim Success £5,500 :lol:

Scrapper vs Barclaycard Partial Settlement Success. Saved £6,000 :lol:

 

Scrapper vs Tesco's FOS upheld complaint. Possible court action to get default removed

 

Scrapper vs Egg (Barclaycard) Awaiting FOS

 

Scrapper vs Barclays Bank Plc Offered made & Refused. This means war :-x

Scrapper vs Barclaycard (Cabot) Waiting 4 years for CCA. Cabot advised irresolvable :lol:

 

Scrapper vs Intelligent Finance. Success

 

Scrapper vs Picture (Webb Resolutions) Success

 

 

Beginner's guide

 

Advice & opinions given by Scrapper are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...
Mail box cleared! Thanks!

 

HI Chipmeister,

 

 

I was reading your thread date back in 2010 against MBNA. what happened at the end. Did you win?

 

I am in same situation and thinking to file N244 to get CPR disclosure. Any advice please will really really appreciated.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...