Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

letter recevied from halifax


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Adrian,

Just looking over this from every angle before we write. Need to know...

what year the account was opened..

did Robinson Way or anyone else threaten you with Court action?

Did you take out card protection?

Are there any significant unfair charges (late payment/over limit fees) on the account

Elsa x

 

PS..

Have they issued you with a formal default notice?..if so we need to see it.

If so, have they terminated or demanded the full balance?

Edited by Undercover-Elsa
More questions :-)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning Elsa

Can’t remember the year ,should I SAR ,re Robinson Way never really talked to them much ,just in there letters.

Adrian

 

re default notice ,I think they did ,will see if I can find ,No default notice,I am just wondering if it has been posted to my old address ,as it was about 2 weeks before I nofity them of my new address .

unfair charge , don't thing so

Edited by adrianenler
re question re fault notice
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Adrian :)

I wouldn't bother doing a SAR yet.

I'm trying to find any possible alternative reason to keep it "in dispute", but if not no worries we'll go with their lack of original agreement.

Did you take out card insurance with them?

Default Notice may be significant, if you can find it..they often get them wrong. ;)

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I'm trying to maintain the dispute status, but backed up with the lack of agreement argument, so something on the lines of :

 

Ref Account Number xxxxx

 

 

Dear Sir,

Thankyou for your letter of xxxx in which you state that you have discharged your obligations by supplying a reconstructed version of the agreement. For your reference I am fully aware of OFT guidelines in respect of satisfying Section 77-79 requests post the Carey Judgement. I would remind you that irrespective of legal aspects of the judgement your suitability to hold a Credit Licence is still dependant upon complying with OFT guidelines.

 

I note that you also state that you are unable to locate the original agreement.

In response, I query how you can possibly provide an accurate reconstruction, without having the original on which to base this reconstruction.

 

Your statement in your earlier letter that our procedure has always been to obtain our customers signatures to an agreement containing the prescribed terms before entering into a credit card agreement” seems very official and competent, but is undermined somewhat by the fact that your procedure at the time did not apparently extend to securely storing that agreement.

 

You imply in an earlier letter that you would provide other evidence in order to enforce via the courts.

According to the OFT, it is an unfair practice to mislead debtors into believing that a debt is enforceable or to imply that an agreement exists where it does not.

 

Acting upon advice, I requested a copy of the agreement in response to threats from debt collectors, in order to ascertain whether you or your representatives have a right to demand payment. You have not provided me with any proof that an agreement was signed by myself or that the agreement would have contained the prescribed terms, as you are unable to locate an original copy for reference.

 

I therefore feel that you have NOT legally complied with my request and clearly this account remains in dispute.

 

Even regardless of s. 77-79 compliance, obviously I cannot acknowledge a debt for which you have provided no legally enforceable documentation, and you or your representatives cannot threaten legal action in the knowledge that it cannot be taken.

If you did attempt to pursue this through the Courts it would be vigorously defended.

.

I note that you have refused to write off this debt, however for the reasons stated above I will continue to withhold payment, as is my legal right.

 

This is my final communication unless or until you provide the necessary legally compliant documentation, at which time I would of course negotiate a suitable repayment schedule.

 

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

 

Anyone else, feel free to suggest amendments :-)

 

Elsa x

 

Keep looking for the Default Notice, we'll deal with that seperately.

Edited by Undercover-Elsa
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elsa

Thanks for letter ,re the Default Notice ,I can't remember gettng one ,I think they may have posted it to my old address ,as it was about two weeks before I nofity them of my new address ,should I writing request a copy before I sent the above letter

 

Adrian

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all

Just to update ,received this letter in answer to my letter ,which Elsa advised me to send ,just wondering if anyone could advise me what to do next ,I’ve received letters from Robinson way ,saying that the debt has been passed to them ,your advise is much appreciate

http://s904.photobucket.com/albums/ac244/adrianenler/?action=view&current=14july2001-1.jpg&t=1282581569240#!oZZ2QQcurrentZZhttp%3A%2F%2Fs904.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fac244%2Fadrianenler%2F%3Faction%3Dview%26current%3Dhalifax20082010001.jpg%26

Link to post
Share on other sites

ELSA....................sorry missed your question................I should have been a little more specific...........send the site" account in dispute" letter but make the 1st line "As by your own admission you do not have an agreement which underpins the account in dispute,and on this basis I do not acknowledge any debt..............take your point on the stupid judgement,I have found this approach slows them down and as you have said,no agreement if it goes to court good chance of winning against creditor..............regards FS

Edited by firstship
error
Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning Folks,

Their letter of response is basically templated as they have got wise to CCA requests and their limitations since the Carey judgement, and obviously found someone who can do joined up writing to formulate a response.

You're in the twilight zone now, as are many of us. They've stated no signed agreement can be found, but they won't accept that it's therefore unenforceable. I'm suprised they didn't quote Carey at you. However, if they did the response would be that the judge in Carey also ruled that if an agreement has been varied since inception, then a copy of the EXECUTED agreement would be required if court action was taken. ;-)

Sit it out now. If Robbers Way get too persistant,and actually threaten legal action, just write and tell them that Halifax have confirmed that they are unable to locate the signed agreement and it is against OFT debt collection guidelines to threaten legal action in the knowledge that none can be taken...so take a hike :-)

Firstship...no probs! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All

Just to keep all up to date ,received letter today 20th from Moorcroft informing of intended litigation ,it gives me till the 22nd, to reach agreement ,the letter is dated 15th. was just going to send them copy of above letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...