Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yee I mentioned after the new regulations. Depends if the amount off to date will take that threshold below £50k
    • In short you never communicate with a Debt Collector, they have no power here at all. The snotty letter is only used to respond to a properly worded Letter Before Claim. The only time you would be recommended to contact the PPC is to send the snotty letter. You do nothing but keep the tripe they send you unless you receive a letter before claim.
    • Probably to do with the Creditor accepting the reduced payments claim as part of the IVA. - Thats my guess anyway.  As for the mount outstanding... 60k is incredible and im pretty sure a DRO wouldnt cover that much even after the new legislation.    For you @Alfy - Please stay headstrong and stop worrying. My viewpoint on debt with debt collectors is simple. You are a figure on a spreadsheet loaded into a database for them to run a collection cycle through.  They dont care about emotions or your situation, they just care about paying off their shareholders and trying to turn a profit.  They use varying tactics to increase the pressure on you to the point where you will break. People then fall for this an either cave in to DCAs before doing their own due diligence on the debts that are purchased or turn to IVAs like you have.    They are better ways to handle this and Im glad you feel better after a good nights sleep - I hope you can keep it up. 
    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

From Wescot To ScotCall...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5069 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello again,

 

this was the initial thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/252533-being-mailed-wescot-debt.html

 

Now new developments: Wescot wrote to me saing that the debt I referred to in that thread (that said debt wasn't mine) has been closed and sent back to the water company, so that was an excellent result thanks to the Consumer Forums. :)

 

However, the debt's now been picked up by ScotCall, so I can only presume either somebody somewhere has nothing better to do with their lives than pick up random debts, or somebody at the water company hasn't updated their records to say that this debt is effectively unrecoverable.

 

. I've sent the standard "I know nothing about this" letter to ScotCall telling them to basically get lost, however I'm in two minds as to whether to make official complaints to either the water company or Ofwat, or even Trading Standards or the FSA. The water company acknowledges that I, as the current tenant, do not owe this debt.

 

The thing with ScotCall (and Fredrickson come to that) is they don't acknowledge anything you send them. At least Wescot said they're investigating it, which is more than ScotCall (for other disputed debts) ever did, which is why I feel making an official complaint to them is about as much good as a chocolate teapot.

 

So I suppose the next question is, having sent the stock letter, if they (or any other debt company on this issue for that matter) continue to write for this specific debt, what do I do please? Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

I note from that thread, too, it was a previous tenant's debt ...

However, the debt's now been picked up by ScotCall, so I can only presume either somebody somewhere has nothing better to do with their lives than pick up random debts, or somebody at the water company hasn't updated their records to say that this debt is effectively unrecoverable

.

 

Are they directing their mail to you by name or whomever the last tenant was? Also, where does Frederickson now figure in all this? It's not your debt so ... I am unsure why you are getting involved with it, it's not your responsibility to sort out. I would tend to ignore any mail not addressed to you directly and simply not get involved in any of it. This is why perhaps Scotcall has now become involved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had debts addressed to about six different names at this address so it's anybody's guess as to what on earth what was going on here before I moved in. I suspect the majority of the names that these companies now have were fabricated in order to get credit so whether any of these people actually exist is probably debatable, but I can't prove anything and I'll probably never know for sure.

 

Fredrickson was a simple moan on my part. They're not involved in this one. Yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Cartaphilus

Yes, I also get countless names (in fact one of the previous tenants where I used to live I actually know exactly where she lives and has lived since courtesy of her name appearing in the newspaper ... It's really par for the course with rental properties. People move, they leave debts behind; usually to avoid paying them and leaving them behind for the new tenant to face all the post (however it does eventually catch up with them however long it takes).

 

I would actually ignore anything they've been sending and carry on sending it back 'not at this address'. It's utterly Wetcloths, Scuttlecall's responsiblity to trace where these people are now. I should think that they would look extremely foolish if they tried to take you to court anyway for someone elses debt ... It's usually pretty normal for example to get mail at a new address (I am told that where I used to live at my parental home - they've been dead for years - the people living there still get junk mail for them).

fabricated in order to get credit so whether any of these people actually exist is probably debatable, but I can't prove anything and I'll probably never know for sure.

Yes, that also happens as well unfortunately. All the more reason not to get involved. However, how many have lived at that property over the years? Could be just as simple as that. Edited by Cartaphilus
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

The thing with ScotCall (and Fredrickson come to that) is they don't acknowledge anything you send them. At least Wescot said they're investigating it, which is more than ScotCall (for other disputed debts) ever did, which is why I feel making an official complaint to them is about as much good as a chocolate teapot.

 

 

I wrote to Scotcall about letters sent to my address in error and they responded saying that they wouldn't bother me anymore. I did send by recorded delivery and threatened to report them to the OFT, if I didn't get a reply.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...