Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
    • Danny - point taken about the blue paragraphs.  Including them doesn't harm your case in any way.  It makes no odds.  It's just that over the years we've had judges often remarking on how concise & clear Caggers' WSs have been compared to the Encyclopaedia Britannica-length rubbish that the PPCs send, so I always have a slight preference to cut out anything necessary. Don't send off the WS straight away .. you have plenty of time ... and let's just say that LFI is the Contract King so give him a couple of days to look through it with a fine-tooth comb.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

can you claim jobseekers & still appeal esa


jc2038
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hello,

 

i have been claiming esa income related for 1 year and have not

had to provide sick lines for a long time

i had to attend a second/review medical in may 2010.

 

they claim i am fit to work, options are lodge an appeal and provide

sick lines for the next 6/7 months until tribunal hearing

 

or claim jobseekers now, the dwp say if i claim jobseekers i can not appeal

because i have accepted the decision

 

obviously i would like my condition to improve and dont want to go back

to having to provide sick lines which i have no guarantee of them being provided for the full 6/7 months

 

any advice

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you've answered your own question. You can't appeal ESA if you claim JSA.

I'm not a qualified welfare rights adviser, but I'm planning on becoming one. I'm no substitute for more competent advice from trained CAB and welfare rights workers - [URL="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/benefits-tax-credits-minimum/127741-benefits-advice.html"]see this post[/URL] by Joa, great advice and links! I've been running a Crisis Loan campaign and help since Jan 2007 . See my annotations c/o "theyworkforyou". I'm also currently interested by the recent DWP Medical Services reform and the effect this is having on valid claims, seriously - someone needs to be keeping a suicide count.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason i ask was

 

i found this: but is it still applicable

 

cpag Welfare Rights Bulletin 207 December 2008

 

ESA decisions and appeals

 

Simon Osborne outlines the rules regarding decision-making and

challenges in employment and support allowance (ESA).

 

 

Whilst appealing, claimants can if they so wish stay on ESA, though at a reduced rate.

Claimants found not to have limited capability for work who have appealed against

that decision can get reduced-rate ESA whilst the appeal is pending,

provided that they continue to submit medical certificates

- note that is not restricted to income-related ESA.[Footnote 15]

It is understood that the appeal letter can be treated as a new claim for ESA,

and the reduced-rate is achieved by applying only the 'assessment phase'

rate of ESA (i.e., without additional components) while the appeal is pending.

[Footnote 16] An alternative (as in incapacity for work appeals) is for the claimant

to claim jobseeker's allowance while appealing.

The DWP has confirmed to CPAG the official intent that where that happens,

and the claimant subsequently wins their appeal so re-establishing entitlement to ESA,

they will be able to receive arrears of ESA less any JSA paid.[Footnote 17]

 

 

Footnote 17

 

17. Email from DWP to Simon Osborne, CPAG, 15 October 2008 [back to text]

 

Welfare Rights Bulletin 207 December 2008

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have misadvised you.

 

You can claim JSA whilst you appeal ESA.

 

When you appeal ESA you continue to receive benefit payments for ESA at the assessment rate provided you send in sick lines until the final determination of the appeal. If however, you claim JSA pending the appeal outcome, you cannot receive the ESA assessment rate as well. But that does not mean you cannot appeal just because you have claimed JSA. That's absolute rubbish.

 

I would not recommend claiming JSA if you appeal ESA. I would recommend claiming the assessment rate of ESA. The amounts are exactly the same, and with the appeal the ESA is instant upon receipt of the appeal and sick line. With JSA you would have to apply for it all over again, wait for a decision and then continually satisfy the conditions for claiming JSA.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks ErikaPNP your a star , more scales added

 

good advice

 

 

it is complicated by just recently moving, and having to register with a new GP

who i will see for the first time next week, who may not have my medical records yet

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi yes you can still appeal against E s a while being on jobseekers allowance,i am doing the same thing,i got a letter from them to say yes I can carry on appealing while making a claim for J s a, I had both open claims to these,but had to close one down,my doctor in the past refused to give me a fit note, even though they know ive got health problems, it just felt so degrading begging for a sick note am a emonitional person so also very upsetting , in the end decided to claim j s a ,my advisor knows my health problems and have been ok so far, good luck ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...