Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • follow it thru, plenty of time to poss arrange a tomlin or consent later on. ............   pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/466952-lowelloverdales-claimform-old-cap1-debt/?do=findComment&comment=5260464 .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] .............. dx
    • so you've never been issued a default notice ever and all these accounts still show on your credit file?  
    • No i decided I would try and keep paying this down as best I possibly could and have paid over 35k off of the total amount. It’s been hard as hell tbh but just seems too much to do with the prospect of job disruption looking. the issue I have with pro rats is the credit file is trashed anyhow like you are defaulted anyhow is it not? I am willing to trash it for 6 years if needs must but having it trashed for over a decade seems crazy. This is the dilemma I am in
    • come on .😉..you'd read our threads.. you already knew these things. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

advatage finance charge claim ****WON****


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 93
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, indeed.

 

Right, this looks all standard, but I think you're missing lots of information from your Witness Statement - take a look here;

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates.html

 

But more specifically, here;

 

http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/48-bank-templates/119-basic-court-bundle

 

Can you see what I mean by lots of info missing?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

S.140a The court may make an order … in connection with a credit agreement if it determines that the relationship between the creditor and the debtor … is unfair to the debtor...

 

Therefore it's open to a plain argument that the relationship between customers and lenders is unfair. Yet the big bonus of using this law is where the burden of proof lies – it's for the banks to prove charges are fair rather than customers to prove they're not.

 

what about this peice mate

The Second statement is false, The first statement is true

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

well judge awarded partial payment as he agrees the £35 charges were excessive but only ordered the refund of £25 per charge, the judge tore my arguements apart and i only actually won due to the paperwork advantage were relying on showing the total cost of the collections department, this shows that the department costs a lot more than they actually claim back. i have had some previous experience with budget forecasts and profit and loss and know how to read them, but the biggest part was they actually included what it cost to deal with an account in arrears per year per account whoops. it costs advantage £19 to look after a defaulted account for the whole year. i explained what this meant to the judge and asked how charging some one £35 a time or £12 be a genuine preestimate of costs incurrred when they already have what it costs on paperwork. the judge responded a genuine pre-estimate can be anything the companys deems it to be. this dumbfounded me as the whole point was unfair and excessive charges which is clearly proven. in reality it cost advantage £60 over 3 years to handle my account whilst in arrears but tried to charge £538 if that not excessive what is.

 

i then commented that after the £19 is recovered from one payment then the rest of the charges are pure profit to which the judge replied the company is entitled to make profit. again i thought they were not allowed to make a profit on penalty charges, it did seem that the judge was on their side but awarded partial settlement anyway

 

on the plus side

received a cheque

all outstanding money will be cleared(not that its much, Think this is a goodwill gesture)

my default notice will be removed

will receive a letter showing the account is settled and they have no interest in the car

 

all this was agreed by the other party after the court case

 

so fingers crossed this will all be put to bed now

Edited by simpson_eh
adding more detaisl

The Second statement is false, The first statement is true

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could have been worse-a win nevertheless.

Well done.:-)

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done. Make sure that default really does get removed.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OMG! Just come back after some personal issues to see your late PM's - glad it all went well on the day, (well, 'ish...') a win is a win no matter how dirty you had to fight - it's nothing compared to what they've put you through.

 

Well done!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...