Jump to content


Harsh Letter received from Kensington *Claim struck out in court*


jamorgan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5958 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ditto Hulse Morgy - if you have paypal a/c pm me if you prefer.

 

Hugs

 

lel

2006 RatNest - Personal a/c:

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £7,000

 

2006 RatNest - Ltd Co a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £8,000

 

2006 RatNest - Hub's a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim,Sept Settled in full £1,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 371
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 2 weeks later...

Having read all the comments on the kensington letter it seems to me that the structure of the charge merits comment.In my case the charge was expressed as 6% of the redemption sum in the the first three years of the mortgage and nothing thereafter.Purely arbitrary and very difficult to present as a rational estimate of the loss they might suffer. Also even at a discounted interest rate for the first three years,their rates were still above the regular market.Their letters are intimidating but mostly bluff.It must be called

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the grounds that:

 

1. there was no breach of contract because Jamorgan was exercising a right contained in the contract to terminate early.

2. The term was not subject to the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations because it related to the adequacy of the remuneration or price.

3. Kensington were entitled to their legal costs under the indemnity clause contained in the mortgage.

 

The issue of whether the charge amounted to a penalty did not arise because there was no breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Thankyou, thankyou,

so much for all the support you guys

and good luck

x

 

 

Jamorgan..

you are one brave,courageous and ballsy individual..go and give them hell ..we are right behind you all the way as there are hundreds more claims on the way and believe me they shall not be able to defend them all however big their litigation department is!

 

good luck!

r.d.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am also happy to make a donation.

REFUNDED

Hubbys - HSBC £4,165 paid 18/8 after MCOL issued :)

HSBC - £651 paid 18/8 after MCOL issued :)

HSBC - £147 Prel 7/8, LBA 21/8, MCOL 6/9 £241

Hubby Halifax - Prel 29/7 £215, LBA 21/8, Offer rec. £110 22/8, MCOL 6/9 £298

Abbey - £2758 - Prel 26/6, LBA 10/7 - MCOL 26/7 £3,391, offer 25/8 £1,755.94, paid £3567.32 after Case manag hearing

Barclays - £675 Prel7/8, LBA 21/8, offer received £300 MCOL 6/9 £998 - Paid £1,012 before going to Court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watchin an waitin Morgy...........

 

hugs

2006 RatNest - Personal a/c:

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £7,000

 

2006 RatNest - Ltd Co a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim, Oct Settled in full £8,000

 

2006 RatNest - Hub's a/c

JulyLBA, Aug Filed Claim,Sept Settled in full £1,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i dont know if this is any use in claiming back these nasty erc's, but Tom Brennan the barrister whose taking natwest to court, is using a different approach to claim his bank charges maybe this could be used for erc's

 

 

If anyone is interested, here is Tom Brennan's website.

 

www.tombrennan.co.uk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i dont know if this is any use in claiming back these nasty erc's, but Tom Brennan the barrister whose taking natwest to court, is using a different approach to claim his bank charges maybe this could be used for erc's

 

 

If anyone is interested, here is Tom Brennan's website.

 

www.tombrennan.co.uk

 

No, it has no bearing on ERC's whatsoever.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jamorgan

 

Still watching with bated breath. We had to sell our house, as I told you before, to avoid repossession, but if we hadn't had to pay the ERC we might have had something to put down on something else, Good luck

 

Blidge

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope we can get some justice for you too Blidge.

 

Just recieved a letter from Drydens solicitors

 

Please note that unless we recieve your satisfactory proposals to repay the judgement debt by 4pm on the 26th April 2007, our client will have no alternative but to enforce the judgement debt through the court.

 

A couple of days ago I recieved a letter from Drydens (for the secound time) requesting, could they have a copy of the transcript

There having a laugh!

 

Not sure what to do now with this

any thoughts

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are if you are appealing the the jdgement is in dispute anyway, and could be overturned, but this is costs awarded on their indemnity so even if you win the appeal you could still be liable for their costs?

Dunno how best to advise you here - hopefully zoot will. No doubt she will be along later.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope we can get some justice for you too Blidge.

 

Just recieved a letter from Drydens solicitors

 

Please note that unless we recieve your satisfactory proposals to repay the judgement debt by 4pm on the 26th April 2007, our client will have no alternative but to enforce the judgement debt through the court.

 

A couple of days ago I recieved a letter from Drydens (for the secound time) requesting, could they have a copy of the transcript

There having a laugh!

 

Not sure what to do now with this

any thoughts

 

Jamorgan..

how about creating a "fighting fund" for everybody concerned when they are taking kensington to Court???

this fund can be used to help people to continue their cases even if there was a risk of costs being awarded against them.. in most cases,the judge would not order these costs as long as the refunds are below £5000.- as we all know,therefore the risk is minimal...

 

what does everybody say??

 

consider this ; if everybody who had been hard doe by kensington paid only £10.--each for this fund,we shall have more than enough to represent everybody and believe me this will put the scares up the Big Boy! and many similiarly featured other companies too!

what do you reckon..worth a shot???

my £10.- ready when you are!

 

keep the faith.

R.D.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Indemnity for costs was never intended to protect mortgage lenders from the consequences of unlawful or unfair practice. It was introduced to protect the funds of ordinary society members before they became banks.

 

My view is that you should link unlawful penalty charges together with the ERC as one claim. If you establish that the charges are unlawful then you argue that your contract/agreement has been breached by the lender. Therefore the indemnity clause no longer applies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info Zoots, were getting a little bit of movement now,

sending all the documants he requires today to the barrister at the given address.

Fingers crossed everyone

Morgy x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers Crossed.

Yep as someone said. Money waiting for you. Just give me the details in a private message.

Good luck.

Subject Access Request for Kensington sent:23/11/06

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) for Clysdale sent on 24/01/07 which they lost, sent again on 04/04/07

 

AA Payed in full £85:00 15/07/06 woo hoo!!

King's Lyn Gym, £550 settled. Woo hoo my first win!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...