Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
    • hi lolerz many thanks for your reply and help. My 2 months has passed i was waiting until the court proceedings started. As i went through this process not that long ago, i shall look back at my old thread for how to respond. Ill get the docs scanned soon thanks.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is This A Valid CCA? They Say Yes - I Say No


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi LTD,

 

The letters from HL Legal Sol'rs is probably a standard letter as Debt Star suggests. Their suggestion of court action may be serious, or may just be a standard idle threat.

 

In any event, I thought you were about to start proceedings against the bank for charges.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 149
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

And you can ignore the so-called solicitors, in my opinion.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LTD,

 

The letters from HL Legal Sol'rs is probably a standard letter as Debt Star suggests. Their suggestion of court action may be serious, or may just be a standard idle threat.

 

Hi Slick

 

Yes I realise it is probably a standard threat-o-gram, I just don't want to fall foul of anything that could jeopadise the way things go from here.

 

In any event, I thought you were about to start proceedings against the bank for charges.

 

Yes - As soon as the dealine passes from the LBA I am going to proceed that way.

 

I know I shouldn't have done, but I have spoken to CapQuest by phone and told them to stop pestering me, as the account is clearly in dispute. I shall again write to them tomorrow with a copy of the original dispute that I raised, just for the avoidance of any doubt and that they cannot say that I have not informed them of any dispute. The guy I spoke to has told me he will pass it back to admin to sort out the dispute, but they will have to wait until Hell freezes over, or Cap One repay what I am owed before I speak to them again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi TDS

 

The OC was Capital One, CapQuest have bought the debt off them, probably because of the age of the agreement. 2001

 

I CCA'ed CapQuest and they sent me the NOA, the front page of the agreement, which is at the beginning of this thread. But no T and C's

 

CapQuest then sent me the T and C's but these are obviously reprinted and not from the back of the agreement, as there are about 6 pages or so of them.

 

I put the account in dispute with CapQuest and they then wrote a long leter back saying that they do not believe it is in dispute, and then today I received a letter off HL Legal.

 

It does not mention anything about an admin charge.

 

 

 

I haven't actually reported CapQuest to anyone at the moment, and I have a LBA against Cap One sent last week asking for the £4.7k back that they owe me for unfair charges, late fees, and Contractual / Stat Interest. My balance of the Cap One account is said to be just less than £2000 according to CapQuest and Cap One. Therefore, I am owed more than I owe CapQuest.

 

The problem is (or that I can see) Cap One owe this to me, and any balance that I may owe to Cap One is technically owed to CapQuest as they bought the debt.

 

 

 

The agreement to me is unenforceable.

 

caponeagreement.gif

 

As it has none of the prescribed terms on it. As previously stated, they have sent a copy of the T and C's but these are on about 6 or 7 pages, and there is no way that they could have been within the 4 corners. I understand this was later addressed, but the date of the original agreement is 2001 so does not come into it afaik

 

The T and C's they have sent do not even correspond to the correct amount being charged for default charges, as in my statements from Cap One show £20 etc but the T and C's have a lower amount, and so could not be from the original agreement anyway.

 

Also the Agreement was sent initially, but with no T and C's and so if they were part of the original agreement, then surely they would have sent them all at the same time.

 

Not just that, its an application form not a credit agreement to my mind! That really is a shocker. Still, I would be minded to argue the toss in correspondence with HL if it was me 'cos you may just find they 'have a word' with CapQuest on the unenforceability of the document plus your counter claim.

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not just that, its an application form not a credit agreement to my mind! That really is a shocker. Still, I would be minded to argue the toss in correspondence with HL if it was me 'cos you may just find they 'have a word' with CapQuest on the unenforceability of the document plus your counter claim.

 

Thanks TDS

 

That's what's worrying me, on one hand I am claiming it is unenforceable, on the other I am asking Cap One for the fees they have charged me back. It seems a little not right if you get what I mean.

 

I am quite happy to pay CapQuest in full with the refund from Cap One, it's just do I let them know or do I hit them with it once they issue proceedings. A £4.7k counterclaim should blow any hope of them getting any money out of the water. Hopefully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say take the initiative and issue proceedings asap.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I say take the initiative and issue proceedings asap.

 

possibly...but teh problem with that is costs. if you lose, you pay their legal fees. but then, will you? I see the point you are making but, truth be told, both yuo and CrapOne are then saying the agreement is enforceable and you want the charges refunded. Yes, I think this is the way to go and that you probably should sue them. BUT write to the 'solicitors' making your case. You could, in the interim, agree a repayment plan with CrapQuest while you CrapOne case is being pursued?

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

possibly...but teh problem with that is costs. if you lose, you pay their legal fees. but then, will you? I see the point you are making but, truth be told, both yuo and CrapOne are then saying the agreement is enforceable and you want the charges refunded. Yes, I think this is the way to go and that you probably should sue them. BUT write to the 'solicitors' making your case. You could, in the interim, agree a repayment plan with CrapQuest while you CrapOne case is being pursued?

 

In Small Claims I don't think I would be liable to costs?

 

I offered Cap One to settle for approx £4k if they did within 10 days of the LBA but so far not a sausage from them.

 

I do know that Cap One would offset any arrears with CapQuest before I got any money from them, of which I am happy to do, thta was what I have offered them in the reduced without prejudice offer in the LBA I sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then it will be small claims and no need to worry about heavy costs from the other side- keep it below £5000 and simple

 

Good, that was what I was thinking. I know the interest is going up daily, but I was going to use the original figures that I asked for in the LBA and not rework them to off set the chance of it going over the 5k mark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re Death Star's post #133 above, as long as you are confident with the spreadsheet calculations for interest, there is very little chance of losing the court claim for repayment, whether the claim is under or over £5K.

 

I suspect negotiating on this with HL Sol'rs will be a waste of time as they're only interested in getting money FROM you.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re Death Star's post #133 above, as long as you are confident with the spreadsheet calculations for interest, there is very little chance of losing the court claim for repayment, whether the claim is under or over £5K.

 

I suspect negotiating on this with HL Sol'rs will be a waste of time as they're only interested in getting money FROM you.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the standard, it is going to take us a while to respond to your query letter this morning. I hope they don't take too long. They have about 6 days left by my reckoning before the 14 days runs out that I gave them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Re Death Star's post #133 above, as long as you are confident with the spreadsheet calculations for interest, there is very little chance of losing the court claim for repayment, whether the claim is under or over £5K.

 

I suspect negotiating on this with HL Sol'rs will be a waste of time as they're only interested in getting money FROM you.

 

Hi Slick

 

I used the standard compound calculator, and worked it out at about 22% as that is the rate shown on my screenshots from Cap One from the SAR.

 

All worked out on a spreadsheet and then the 8% added by that.

 

The only potential issue is the over 6 year rule thingy but I had countered that in my LBA using the words that you mentioned.

 

I agree re the solicitors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like Cap One are not playing ball. The 14 days is up on Thursday, so I shall start the ball rolling re the POC's for my N1

 

Any pointers on how best to present them?

 

Also just to throw a spanner in the works for CapQuest and HL Legal I have sent them a couple of letters.

 

1) I requested under CPR everything that HL would rely on etc if they were to proceed to court

2) I sent CapQuest the 'in serious dispute letter', telling them to bog off until such time that they provide me with an agreement and not an application form, along with the prescribed terms etc

 

Let's see how they resond to that.

 

I hope that CapQuest used HL Legal for a template generic threatening letter, you know the ones for about 75p in bulk. Hopefully now HL Legal have to do some work, and will bill CapQuest accordingly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LDT,

 

I think asking for info from HL Legal at this stage is a waste of your time. They have no obligation to supply it until they actually start proceedings.

 

Get to work on the POC's. This is from the Cap One forum Stickies - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?117741-New-Cap-1-Poc

 

:)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Small Claims I don't think I would be liable to costs?

 

I offered Cap One to settle for approx £4k if they did within 10 days of the LBA but so far not a sausage from them.

 

I do know that Cap One would offset any arrears with CapQuest before I got any money from them, of which I am happy to do, thta was what I have offered them in the reduced without prejudice offer in the LBA I sent.

 

 

without prejudice i hope!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a similar issue and the copy of the NOA interests me greatly. I have received a NOA that was supposedly from CITI. It is EXACTLY the same as yours and came in an envelope that has CapQuests POBOX on the reverse so i know it didnt come from CITI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody help me?

 

I have fallen on hard times and now im unable to pay the full amount on my monthly load to CITI Financial. I have been sending them letter after letter since March asking if they could freeze the

interest
link3.gif
and accept a lower payment (just under 50% of the agreed monthly amount) until my finances recover but they have never bothered to reply. I have however had letters telling me I have had charges added to my account due to non payment.

 

Then today I have received a text message and a letter from CAPQUEST saying that CITI have sold my debt to them. Interestingly I also received a letter supposedly from CITI stating they have sold the debt to CAPQUEST. Both are dated the 24th August and arrived today on the 26th.

 

Upon reading a few posts on here I looked closer at the 2 letters and it’s now crystal clear that the letter from CITI isn’t actually real at all. The idiots at CAPQUEST have clearly just typed up the letter on a cheap piece of plain A4 paper and printed the CITI logo on the top left. I have compared this to previous correspondence from CITI and they are nothing alike.

 

I then looked at the envelope the 2 letters arrived in and as expected, CAPQUESTS envelope stated it was from their office in Fleet. However the envelope used for the “CITI” letter had a different PO Box printed on the back. Further investigation has now shown me that this PO Box belongs to CAPQUEST in Bristol so its impossible for this letter to have been sent from CITI. ********My "NOA" is in fact exactly the same as this one from Cap One. Only the logo is different********

 

I have contacted CITI to complain that they have not written back to acknowledge my request to make a lower payment and to ask if they have any record of sending me any letter stating they were selling my debt on. They have confirmed that they have not sent any letter and I am now going to send them a copy of their own letter.

 

Im thinking they should have either acknowledged my request and also wrote to inform me they are selling on my debt but as of today, I have received neither.

 

Surely this is fraud committed by CAPQUEST but I don’t know what to do next.

 

HELP PLEASE

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...