Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, firstly thank you for reading this. I know no one wants a long winded back story. So I’ll be breif. I entered a local store to buy some paint (which I did pay for) I am honestly not a bad person or a theif.   Didn’t have a basket or trolly as was on my lunch break. Whilst picking up the three tubs of paint placed some masking tape in my pocket (it was hanging out of so I had every intention to pay) just didn’t have a hand free. Paid for my goods (forgot about the £4.39 masking tape) I’ve got so much going on and im not well at all (like I say no one cares I get that) also have autism so wasn’t thinking particularly like others do maybe (who knows my minds going around and around) I left the store after paying, was pulled back in by security. Asked for the tape which I gave immediately  shook up. Gave them my ID and details. I was given some paper and told to expect a large fine in the post for their time and the tape and sent on my way. my questions are: I hardly ever go out without support so the ban I guess I can’t go there now for anything (their loss) - ok but is my photo going to be all over with my name? how much am I expecting in the post as a fine? I have sent them cash in the post recorded signed for delivery to arrive tomorrow (incident happened today) for my error. Their Address was on the bit of paper. i have read two posts on this page but they were from many many years ago so I hoped for updated advise please? 
    • V important you read lots of BMW threads too !  
    • So should I send them a new SAR and put my date of birth on it? Or do I need to send them some proof? Driving license? 
    • Thanks so much for your help!! I've emailed them, and when they reply saying they can't do it I'll reply and state my rights. I'm so glad I found this forum, and will read all of the posts I can find and help guides available for the future. Really can't thank you enough.
    • utter BS, doesn't matter you signed it. pers i'd be writing as per the other threads here rejecting the car as not as described under CRA etc and be done with it. as its a debit card you could also do a full chargeback within 120 days to your bank and simply dump the car back to BMW. 100's of like threads to read here. get your ducks inline. make sure you know what you are doing and off you go. dont take any BS from BMW, no matter what you sign it does NOT remove your consumer rights. p'haps it might be on the off chance you are a good manager , a quick phonecall tomorrow saying you dont want it because (no bla bla fitted) it might be resolved in 5 mins..i will guess to date you not tried
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank siezes money on news of death to pay off loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5092 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Folks,

 

your assistance is required. My uncle recently passed away. Yesterday, my aunt went to the clydesdale Bank in Glasgow where they have a joint account. She told them that he died last week. The teller demanded all his credit cards and debit cards and the bank then took £3000 out of their joint account to pay off an unsecured loan in my uncle's name.

 

Now from my understanding this sounds rather dodgey. Surely on death (and there is a will) the executor (my aunt) is required to apply probate and therefore any claim the bank have on the estate is dealt with in strict order:

 

Funeral expenses

 

Secured Debts

 

Unsecured Debts

 

HMReveneue

 

DWP

 

My question is: were the bank allowed to take the money from the joint account and pay off thedebt on hearing (verbally) that my uncle had died?

 

surely the joint account should have been frozen, the will executed, the estate drawn up and after the above paid, the loan been settled?

 

if they are out of order then what can she do about it?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Muppet,

 

I am very sorry to hear of this.

 

I hope to get someone to you soon.

 

Lex

Please help us to help you. Download the CAG tool bar for free

HERE and use the search option for all your searches. CAG earns a few pennies every time !!!

 

Please don't rush, take time to read these:-

 

 

&

 

 

This is always worth referring to

 

 

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by me are personal, are not endorsed by the Consumer Action Group or the Bank Action Group. Should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cannot do that

 

get your solicitor to write a strongly worded letter that the funds should immediately be replaced and distress compensation given.

 

legally what they have done there is VERY out of order and they could be seriously fined for it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Muppetspotter!

 

Firstly, sorry to hear about your Uncle, and the distress this issue has caused for your Aunt.

 

I don't know the answers, yet, but I'm looking into the same issues, so will do all that I can to help.

 

Slightly off topic, but the following may suggest that a word to your Aunt's MP might well receive a sympathetic response:

 

BBC News - 'Unfair' bank charges to be banned, government proposes

 

I agree with dx100uk, in that I think the bank has overstepped the mark here.

 

However, many cannot afford a Solicitor, so if you or your Aunt have no direct legal support in the form of a Solicitor, then you'll need to work around that, and seek support via self-help and from any other directions that are available, or that can be suggested here. Such as your Aunt's MP, as mentioned, or the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS).

 

Few here are fans of FOS, myself included, but they are sometimes useful when matters are simple. Such as when a bank has acted badly, as would seem to be the case here. It's Free, so I'd submit a complaint to FOS anyway, and it may speed up the reversal of the £3,000 fund grab from the Joint Account.

 

I know that most responsible organisations would normally need to see an original copy of the Death Certificate before any steps are taken, so it does seem highly irregular for them to demand that your Uncle's Debit and Credit Cards be surrendered without that evidence. If nothing else, it comes across as very high-handed, unsympathetic, and entirely self-serving of them to act in this way. Nothing new there, but it's especially poor for them to act in this way when your Aunt is coping with the loss of her Husband.

 

I'll try and come back with more concrete advice, ASAP.

 

Cheers,

BRW

Edited by banker_rhymes_with
Typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you send a SAR to Clydesdale too. This will show exactly what these debts were, whether there was any PPI which should have covered the a/cs and any unfair charges which can be reclaimed. http://www.consumerforums.com/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/576-subject-access-request-debt-a-dca

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...