Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Steveob v Barcleys


steveob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6369 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got my statments today I only asked for them about 10 days ago my cheque for £10 was also returned which was nice they owe me just over £1500 over the last six years so let the battle commence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have done my spreadsheet but the interest bit has got me, Looking through my statments over the last six years it looks like I have only been charged about £2.50 could this be correct or should I be adding the interest to what they owe me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two bits of interest.

 

1. Interest you have been charged by being overdrawn or lost on an interest bearing account. This will be included in the refund you demand from the bank. The amount of interest will depend on the type of account you have. It should be itemised on your statements. If it is overdraft interest £2.50 sounds very low for £1500 over six years.

 

2. Interest you add to your claim when you take action in the court to recover your loss. This is always 8%pa and is only added if you start court action via the County Court system e.g. MCOL. The 8% is calculated pro rata on the number of days using the total of the unlawfully taken charges + any interest charged or lost as a result. This + the court fee then forms the basic amount of the claim.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi am ready to send the first letter asking for my money back but im a little confused as the advice given says at this stage do not include the interest but in the templet letter is says im claiming xxxxx plus interest of xxx, Can anyone help me out

Link to post
Share on other sites

"plus interest of XXXXX"

 

This is the amount of Overdraft Interest you have been charged in your statement's, not the 8% interest you would be entitled to if you go to court.

Kingliam

:!:

 

On behalf of the Ginger one

Lloyds TSB - 1ST 12/07/06-LBA 26/07/06-MC-14/08/06-Court-31/01/2007

Halifax - D P A 02/10/06

On behalf of MumKing

Barclays Bank D P A 29/08/06

 

On behalf of DJ Sunny

Alliance & Leicester D P A 29/08/06

 

On behalf of GrandmaKing

GE Capital D P A 30/10/06

Barclays Bank D P A 30/10/06 - 1ST 15/11/06 *Microfiche [problem]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I have posted the first letter asking for my money back giving them 14 days to reply they should have it monday I sent it recorded delivery, Q: do I wait 14 days i-e 14th sept or is it 14 working days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is 14 real days i.e. 14th Sept

 

Good Luck

 

Spotty

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Statement request 4th May

Prelim Letter sent 24th May

LBA 7th June

Thanks but no thanks letter sent 22 June

MCOL 22nd June

Claim acknowledged 26 June

AQ sent 2nd August

17 Nov Court Date Set for 29 Jan 2007

Settled in full 12/12/06

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Hi all, I got Barclays defence today, usual rubbish!!!!!

I have been on the step by step pages to have a look at the guidance notes,which I must say were very useful, but can anyone clarify a few questions I have?

Section D applications-what does this mean?

Witnesses- myself obviously, but how do I put it politely that Barclays have been stealing from my account.

Section F Proposed Directions- what dose this part mean?

Many thanks to anyone who can help me with these points.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have been on to the guidence section of the allocation-questionnaire but I may be a bit dim here, but I just not sure what to put into these sections can anyone clarify a few questions I have?

 

Section D applications-what does this mean?

Witnesses- myself obviously, but how do I put it politely that Barclays have been stealing from my account.

Section F Proposed Directions- what dose this part mean?

Many thanks to anyone who can help me with these points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I recieved my court date today. Its for 28th February, however I am a little concerned regarding the directions that apply to the claim, the letter was dated the 14th Dec which I receieved this morning the 16th Dec, It states;

 

1] Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copie's of all document's ( including expert's report's if the court is given permission for expert evidence to be used ) on which he intend's to rely at the hearing.

 

2] The copie's shall be delivered by 4pm on Friday the 15th Dec 06.

 

3]The original document's shall be brought to the hearing.

 

Are the court are asking me for my court bundle to be delivered by Friday 15th Dec or are they referring to the document's that I have already provided as in the Allocation Questionare, the spread sheets with the sum involved?

Can anybody shed some light onto what there asking I just hope its not the court bundle they want by the 15th Dec as I only got the letter doday the 16th Dec ( the court letter was dated the 14th Dec ).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the court today they WHERE asking for my court bundle, the guy I spoke to said not to worry he will sort a new date out for my bundle to be in by. He said he can't understand why the judge asked for it so early as it would just be sitting on file. The judge allocated it for the small claims on the 1st Dec the hearing date is the 28th Feb 07, I never got any letter telling me about the allocation hearing is this normal, do you think a phone call to Barcleys would be worth it or is it to early to try that one yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have spoken to the court today they WHERE asking for my court bundle, the guy I spoke to said not to worry he will sort a new date out for my bundle to be in by. He said he can't understand why the judge asked for it so early as it would just be sitting on file. The judge allocated it for the small claims on the 1st Dec the hearing date is the 28th Feb 07, I never got any letter telling me about the allocation hearing is this normal, do you think a phone call to Barcleys would be worth it or is it to early to try that one yet.

 

Take a look at post #240 in my thread here . It appears that cases as far ahead as that will not be settled until the New Year.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back to me Welshman, just a quick one in my post I said the court had already allocated my case to the small claims but had not told me about the allocation hearing which was back on Dec 1st, my court date is the 28th Feb any reason for this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely no idea. It may have got lost in the system somewhere. Anyway, no harm done. It's just a shame that Barclays won't at least settle with those who have their dates regrdless of how far ahead they are.

 

I feel very fortunate.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I thought I might just give them a ring to see if they wanted to settle A Mr C Evens is dealing with my case, I never got to speak to him personaly but the messege I got back was to offer me the £850 which was offered back in October which I told them stick it so I told them I would see them in court in Feb.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...