Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FTMDave
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By FTMDave · Posted

      What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • gmlmonika
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By gmlmonika · Posted

      TERMINAL NOTICE.pdf
    • gmlmonika
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By gmlmonika · Posted

      Please find attached 
    • lookinforinfo
      NPC ANPR PCN Claimform - Taxi - Appealed - No Parking Or Waiting At Anytime - St Thomas Hospital, London, Se1 7eh.

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • FTMDave
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By FTMDave · Posted

      This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

go debt

jonimac

By jonimac
in Debt Collection Agencies

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

jonimac

jonimac

Posted
Posted

Hello,

New user here . I too have had problems with godebt. They have harassed me for payment of a lease agreement that they purchased. I explained to them at the start of their harassment that the account was in dispute, but arrogantly they said they did not believe that to be the case. They continued their harassment of me and sent to different process servers to my address to serve a statutory demand on my wife. I explained that we were separated and that she did not live there. After about 2 weeks I had enough of this and made a complaint to the CSA. The second process server in the meantime made a sworn statement to say that he had served the statutory demand, this in fact was a lie, it is suppose to be posted through a letter box if not delivered by hand. He threw it on the floor of my doorstep and walked away. I did not attempt to pick this up and subsequently it blew away. Once the CSA had contacted them with my complaint I recieved a letter to say they were investigating my claims and no further action would be taken. I then recieved a letter some 2 weeks later to say that upon investigations there figures wer wrong and my debt would be reduced by £1800. In the meantime they were at pains to tell me that the statutory demand they had served had run its course and had not been set aside so if I do not pay £5000 by friday they will issue proceedings. Am I right in saying that whilst a dispute is ongoing they are unable to carry on proceedings there by making there SD void aswell as not being served properly. I recieved an initial response to my complaint with the CSA but it tended to favour there client and they said it was unfounded. Godebt seem to take great pleasure in this. Does anyone have any comments on this or recommend a good solicitor. I am not disputing the debt now that the right figures have been provided but I resent the abuse and harassment I have recieved.

Link to post
Share on other sites
palomino

palomino

Posted
Posted
Am I right in saying that whilst a dispute is ongoing they are unable to carry on proceedings there by making there SD void aswell as not being served properly.

 

No. You did not have the SD set aside so they can now petition for your bankruptcy. It's as simple as that.

Any issue or dispute had to be dealt with at a set aside hearing.

 

If you did not open the letter that was left on your doorstep how do you know it was a statutory demand?

In any case, assuming it was a process server, he will swear an affidavit (if he has not already done so) that the SD was properly served. It's your word against his - and he is the one with supposed track record.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
palomino

palomino

Posted
Posted

But that doesn't mean they can't take any action. You are simply relying on their word that they won't.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
jonimac

jonimac

Posted
  • Author
Posted

it is their word in writing after i complained to the csa they stopped pursuing me while investigating they then came back and admitted that their figures were wrong , surely you have to get your facts right before you can claim

Link to post
Share on other sites
palomino

palomino

Posted
Posted

I understand what you are saying. Sadly the law doesn't always work.

At the moment the Statutory Demand is extant because it wasn't set aside. That means they can now lawfully petition for your bankruptcy.

The indications are that they won't in your case, however my (very) bitter experience with creditors suggests otherwise. As far as a creditor is concerned there is no such thing as 'goodwill'.

 

As a suggestion you could write to them in reply to the letter saying no action will be taken asking them to withdraw the SD. If they will agree to this then any bankruptcy petition will go nowhere.

 

None of this stops them from issuing another SD at some time in the future, although they cannot issue a second within a certain time of issuing the first (not sure - may be six months?).

I'm not trying to scare you you, rather to make you aware of the possibilities so you do not get any unpleasant surprises further down the line. Forewarned is forearmed, as the old saying goes :).

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...