Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
    • The neighbour's house is built right on the boundary so the side of their house is effectively the 'wall' in our garden separating the two properties. It's a three storey house and so the mortar poses a potential danger to us. Because of the danger, we have put up an interior fence in our garden to ensure we don't risk mortar dropping on us. That reduces the garden by 25% which is not only an inconvenience, but it's the part of the garden where we had lined up contractors to install a patio and gazebo which we will use for our wedding reception in less than 2 months. We have spoken to the neighbour's caretaker who is on the case, has spoken with a roofer and possibly a scaffolding company, but there are several issues. They don't seem to understand the urgency. As long as there is a risk of falling mortar, we can't carry out any work in the garden, and unless they hurry up, we're looking at cancelling our wedding as it's not viable to book a venue because we can't use our own garden! Also, they want to put the scaffolding up in our garden which would be ok with us if it was a matter of a few days and they hurried up, but there is a tree (most likely protected by the conservation area), so most likely they can only reach part of the roof with the scaffolding if they put it up in our garden. We suggested a roofer with a cherry picker but they seem to want to use a company they've used before. Any and all comments, suggestions, advice is more than welcome.  PS. does it make any difference that the neighbour is a business (ltd) and not a private dwelling?
    • No apology needed, thank you for what you do I am glad to hear they paid. well done on getting back what is yours
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ Help


Marse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

sorry marse

i'm gonna be out of time all today.

 

i'll catch up withyou tomorrow eve

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Dx

 

If a DCA purchases the portfolio of debts from the OC, hasn't the DCA every right to pursue a debt on a legitimate CCJ?

 

Can you point me to any informaton about the non-transferable issue?

 

Thanks Dx

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry marse

 

i'm still rather busy.

 

but don't worry the big guns are coming onboard.

 

now

i currently have two schools of thought and i've not got the time to research either to assertain which is best.

 

1. write to each leecher and demand back the excess payments [bar the £300ish judgement ] back with 8% stat int on top, within 14 days else start court proceeding.

 

2. go straight to court.

 

there are sev things that need investigating, one of which [and my ears are wriggling on this one!] contact the court of the judgement and tell them what has been going on ... i wonder if they will directly help a 71yrs get it sorted.

 

or again

go thru the process of getting it set aside and bring this up during that hearing.

 

i'm just not sure...

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey

thats what we're here for.

 

site team are on to it just wait a fews or less days.

 

if i can get my act together i'll investigate but my brain is fried with pers issues at present.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

As stated earlier, 18 months before the court hearing and the eventual CCJ, I left the matrimonial home (pending divorce) and relocated to London. As I wanted to resolve the debt issue, I informed the OC of my address in London and provided a telephone contact number.

 

(I have copy letters from the CAB which inform he OC that I had left the matrimonial home and a letter from me stating that I no longer resided at the matrimonial home)

 

I asked the OC is I could terminate the agreement, and they refused: they told me I had not paid sufficient money. They instructed me to either sell the car or have it auctioned. They hen arranged a convenient auction room in Wembley and I complied with their instruction to auction.

 

(As the OC said that I had not paid enough money, I assumed that the existing debt was prohibitive.)

 

From the date of the auction, I never heard from the OC again: until my Daughter informed me that I had missed a court hearing.

 

The OC had obtained a default CCJ!

 

Much, much later, I demanded sight of a SAR, and in the documentation I found a copy of the CCJ - I was shocked to find the value of the claim was less than £500, and what is more, the claim had been inflated by £137.20.

 

I also found some default notices which had been sent to my ex-Wife's address - not to my address. In fact, every communication with respect to a pending court hearing was sent to my ex-Wife's address.

 

I then checked the Statement of Accounts, and to my horror on the date that I requested a termination of agreement, I had paid much more that the required amount: I also found that they had raised the necessary paperwork (file copy) but there was no copy of any letter.

 

I want to approach the court (as advised by (dx100UK ), and request the court to set aside the Judgment.

 

Can anyone advise me (1) have I sufficient grounds, and (2) could anyone help in the preparation?

 

Many regards,

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Notice of Assignment of Outstanding Debt

 

In 2006 the OC sold their portfolio of debts to a a dca, or so I believe, because this dca, without warning, sent me a letter demanding more money, which for a time I was able to fend off.

 

Shortly after this, another dca sent a letter stating who they were and began demanding money. The letter that I received had two addresses of the dca's as a heading. Apparently, the second dca and purchased the first dca.

 

I did not receive any Notice of Assignment, whatsoever.

 

In July of 2009 the second dca (as above) sent the debt to another dca to pursue me for the debt.

 

Please advise me what I might do?

 

Regards

 

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

This pertains to the final letter that I received, which arrived after I had lodged an official complaint, and a so-called full investigation into the accounts they held for me.

 

( this dca will talk about three CCJ's - one of which is genuine and two nefarious imagined CCJ's)

 

This is their opening paragraph:

 

"We are currently holding three accounts for you with three Judgements that were consolidated into one amout."

 

(In the SAR there existed the OC's case history notes that contained a day-to-day continual history of events.)

 

The date of the Court hearing was 13/08/1993: I challenged the letter, in the first instance, by a consideration of the consolidation of accounts.

 

In the case history, the OC returned to the same County Court on the 03/09/1993 and "APPLIED TO CONSOLIDATE THE ACCOUNTS" - I duly asked the dca the appropriate question: "If the accounts had been consolidated on the 13/081993, for what reason would the OC return to court and have the accounts consolidated again?"

 

(The next issue was the three Judgements: remember that one was genuine and the other two being nefarious)

 

I asked for sight of the nefarious Judgments again, and again, and again, until the dca's solicitor said that his client did not hold any hard copy of the two Judgments - but it was believed they existed! mmm!

 

Not satisfied, I consulted the OC's case history, again. Let me recapitulate, the dca claims that the OC obtained three Judgements that had been consolidated into one amount on the 13/08/1993.

 

The case notes reveal that the OC returned to the same County Court on the 26/10/1993 to have the Judgement obtained on the 13/08/1993 set aside!!

 

I asked the dca's solicitor, "If you client claim that they are holding three Judgements, for what reason would an OC place at risk a very, very successful Judgement by asking the court to have that Judgment set aside?"

 

To complete the analysis, on the 11/11/1993 the district judge refused the OC's application, and ordered a stay of execution on the payment of my £10 instalment.

 

In the SAR there is only one Judgement in existence.

 

The dca's solicitor has told me that if I rely on this evidence in court, he will ask for sight of the stay of executioin.

 

Comments please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

The dca adds another CCJ: now 3 nefarious CCJ's

In the same letter as already mentioned, the dca identifies the Judgments:

 

1: The genuine CCJ contains a computaional error of £137.20. I have informed the dca accordingly, they refuse to do any reconciliation

 

2: They have now added a CCJ that I have never, ever seen before for approximately £4000. There isn't any Judgment nor agreement - and no Statement of Account. They tell me are trying to locate the files.

 

3 and 4: are the two nefarious CCJ's that have been discussed at an earlier stage

 

With respect to the two nefarious Judgements which date back to 1993, despite admitting they do not possess Judgements, the Writer of the letter says, "I propose that the payment you are making of £10 per month be split equally between the two Judgments. This can be set up by a direct debit or a standing order....."

 

Comments please.

 

Regards

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

....and finally!

 

I am a 71 year old who still maintains his pride: I am suffering with chronic heart failure in which my doctors are expressing concern.

 

A short time ago, I lost my temper with the dca's agent and swore at him, considerably. It did not do me too much good as I ended up in hospital with another heart episode.

 

I cannot continue being hit in the manner that these debt collectors manage their unique and peculiar methodology of debt collection.

 

The last episode took a lot out of me and my doctor is telling me, "enough is enough."

 

I want to get everything in order for my Daughter and the Grandchildren, and I want to be able to do that: and also feel clean! I cannot feel clean when I am dealing with the abject filth of the dca who is currently hounding me.

 

They say, these years that I am having are the "golden years" - well my gold seems to be somewhat tarnished.

 

Please help me to put these people where they deserve to be put.

 

Kindest regards, and I would thank Dx100uk for his continuing assistance. In this, I cannot help but express my amazement, people like Dx100uk have lives of their own, yet spend some of their precious time helping people like me - this World is not all bad - is it?

 

Thankyou,

 

Marse

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

funny my last post vanished........

 

phone the courts named and ask how many ccj's are against you

 

there is a website too, but i dont know it.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Setting aside a Judgment

 

The CCJ that I received by default was in 1993. As I have stated earlier, at this time, I was not living at the matrimonial home: but the OC had been informed accordingly by the Cab and me.

 

After the Court Hearing the oc never wrote to me again and I just continued to pay what the circuit judge had ordered.

 

In 2010, and on receiving the SAR, I realised the I needed to have the CCJ set aside. The SAR arrived in July 2010.

 

During July through October I was in contact with the dca and their solicitor, and in November 2010 I was in hospital again for an hernia repair.

 

I am now hoping to approach the court and apply for set aside; What about time limitaion - I am hoping that I am acting in a timely manner.

 

Comments please.

 

 

Regards

 

Marse

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Afternoon dx,

 

I visited the court some time ago and posed the very same question, the lady behind the desk asked my name and she searched the computer.

 

She told me there was nothing under my name: she then asked me the dates. When I replied she was dumbfounded and told me to go to the CAB- and she gave me a note to take to them.

 

My current credit file at Experian, Equifax and Creditwatch are all devoid of CCJ's, the only blemish is a search by the dca under "debt collection."

 

 

Regards

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Marse,

 

Go onto this site:

 

Check the registers for your CCJ, judgment and fine records - Trust Online

 

You have to pay a small fee but it will tell you all about the CCJ's in your name.

 

You can start to backtrack the process then and clarify matters for everyone. As I suspected this case has a convoluted history and is difficult to resolve until we know, for definite, that there is more than one judgement in existence.

 

I will keep trying to look in on but I have four other cases all involving the same DCA - they are all at high levels of litigation and I can't quite get my head around all of the issues and spread myself across the forum (you may have noticed my activity on other people's threads is one-to-nil).

 

However, you will be doing yourself a favour going to that site and getting the required information. If you like Frost series, this will be a nice piece of detective work ;-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Vinny

 

Not to prempt your suggestion, I have already been there, it cost £8 and I checked my present address and my previous address and there is nothing revealed.

 

I have an Experian account and I continually check my score which is 922, I have checked Equifax and Credit watch with the same result.

 

Do what you have to do, Vinny, I will be waiting.

 

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Still going over he contents of the SAR. For one Account I receive two default notices - is this correct procedure?

 

The date of the DN is given as 18/03/1992 and the the date of remedy is given as 01/09/1992.

 

This is exactly 14 days and in present day terms, this DN would be invalid - but I am concerned about the date. In 1992 how many days were allowed? Could the margin have been less than 14 days?

 

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Still going over he contents of the SAR. For one Account I receive two default notices - is this correct procedure?

 

The date of the DN is given as 18/03/1992 and the the date of remedy is given as 01/09/1992.

 

This is exactly 14 days and in present day terms, this DN would be invalid - but I am concerned about the date. In 1992 how many days were allowed? Could the margin have been less than 14 days?

 

Marse

 

Companies can only issue multiple default notices if the default referred to is rectified; once the account is terminated at the dates specified in the default notice the creditor is placed in the position of being unable to reissue. It can get confusing, but if you have use of a scanner perhaps you can post them on here for us to look at?

 

The previous default notice remedy was 7 days if I recall correctly?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Vinney

 

I do have a scanner: not too sure how to handle it - will try.

 

More information about the alleged debt. The OC sold the debt to a dca, but there is nothing in the SAR about any Notification of Assignment - is this an issue?

 

thank you

 

 

marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Vinney

 

I do have a scanner: not too sure how to handle it - will try.

 

More information about the alleged debt. The OC sold the debt to a dca, but there is nothing in the SAR about any Notification of Assignment - is this an issue?

 

thank you

 

 

marse

 

It certainly is a matter of important but one step at a time :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

After further searches of the SAR and my personal files, I found this letter that I had ignored.

 

It was from Red Castle Recoveries who are/were a dca.

 

"Dear Sir/Madam

 

AS you have been informed within the attached letter (no attached letter), your account has been legally assigned to Red Castle Recoveries Ltd who themselves have been acquired by Gothic Holding AS, a Scandinavian Recoveries Specialist....."

 

And the rest of the letter talked about easy ways to pay the debt.

 

There was no name,

No Account,

No amount,

 

Is this a Notice of Assignment?

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I have been rumaging in the SAR

 

I have three DN's. The date of them are 1992 and each of them have allowed exactly 14 days, which today would make them invalid.

 

I think the rules governing DN's might have changed. Is it that in those days just 7 days were allowed?

 

I really need to find out about this point.

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the rules governing DN's might have changed. Is it that in those days just 7 days were allowed?

 

I really need to find out about this point.

 

Marse

 

Hi Marse,

 

I do believe that 7 days was the prescribed period. This is found in s.88 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974:

 

88.—(1) The default notice must be in the prescribed form

and specify—

(a) the nature of the alleged breach;

(b) if the breach is capable of remedy, what action is required to remedy it

and the date before which that action is to be taken;

© if the breach is not capable of remedy, the sum (if any) required to be

paid as compensation for the breach, and the date before which it is to be paid.

 

(2) A date specified under subsection (1) must not be less than seven days after the date of service of the default notice, and the creditor or owner shall not take action such as is mentioned in section 87(1) before the date so specified or (if no requirement is made under subsection ( 1)) before those seven days have elapsed.

 

Hope this clarifies your query.

 

VJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...