Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCJ Help


Marse
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5135 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

After extensive reading around my problem and taking copious notes from the various contributions proffered by our "Caggers" I think I know what I am to do - the set aside.

 

Concerns:

1: the Judgment happened in 1993 (I did not find out the implications until the SAR during August 2009. Since then I have been in dialogue with my opponent's solicitor: I have been in and out of hospital on two occasions. Do I have an issue with time? I feel that I am attempting to act in a timely fashion

2: My grounds. (a) the oc ignored a plethora of information from the CAB and my letters informing them that I had relocated. (b) all notifications and letters were sent to my ex-Wife's address in the midlands and completely ignored my address in London.

 

3: because of (2) I did not receive any default notification at my address, but in the SAR there were copies of the DN's with my ex-wife's address appended. I was left ignorant that a pending Court hearing was pending.

 

4: the claim that the oc lodged in the County Court had been inflated by £137.20

 

5: On opening the SAR, I found that the OC had not credited the Judgment account with any money the court had ordered: the OC had credited another (nefarious) account.

 

6: The outstanding balance on the Judgment account had lain dormant since 1995, and in 2009 the dca sent this balance to another dca to collect.

 

7: the dca did not provide me with a Notice of Assignment for the necessary authority to pursue the debt.

 

8: By definition, of course, no letter before action.

 

You will ask, If I had been paying the Judgement account for 16 years, that acount would be cleared. It wasnt!

 

I intend to take the dca back to court after the set aside to pursue the money I have paid - so the advice that I need concerns poits 1 through 7 for the set aside of Judgment

 

Ladies & Gentlemen, have I the grounds to successfully negotiate a set aside, I will you help me to formulate my attack on this heathen of a dca?

 

As always, regards,

 

Marse

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 195
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

well i am no expert i/m afraid but i do know that set aside applications after months. let alone years are very difficult.

 

you are going to need (IMO) an astoundingly good reason to have it set aside after 16 years.

 

as i said you might need to pm some of the site team

 

find their names on a post and click on it and it will take you to their personal page and their pm facility

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

If the OC obtains a default Judgement in 1993 and the defendant, in obtaining a SAR in 2009, finds that the OC is at fault - why cannot the defendant apply for a set aside?

 

1: OC sends all letters and notifications to the wrong address,

2: Defendant had provided OC with the new address,

3: The CAB had informed OC of the changed address

4: OC claimed an inflated amount

 

Because of the above:

 

5: Defendant does not receive any default notices,

6: Because of (5)Defendant was not given any chance to remedy breach

7: Defendant did not receive any letter before action

 

In 2009, dca pursues debtor through a 3rd party dca, and has not provided debtor with a notice of assignment.

 

Surely, if I cannot take action, the dca receives all benefits???

 

 

Regards

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

If the OC obtains a default Judgement in 1993 and the defendant, in obtaining a SAR in 2009, finds that the OC is at fault - why cannot the defendant apply for a set aside?

 

1: OC sends all letters and notifications to the wrong address,

2: Defendant had provided OC with the new address,

3: The CAB had informed OC of the changed address

4: OC claimed an inflated amount

 

Because of the above:

 

5: Defendant does not receive any default notices,

6: Because of (5)Defendant was not given any chance to remedy breach

7: Defendant did not receive any letter before action

 

In 2009, dca pursues debtor through a 3rd party dca, and has not provided debtor with a notice of assignment.

 

Surely, if I cannot take action, the dca receives all benefits???

 

 

Regards

 

Marse

 

is it more than 6 years since you made any payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi diddydicky

 

 

Yes!

 

 

Marse

 

ahh well that puts a totally different perspective on things- as it stands they cannot enforce the CCJ after 6 years of inactivity without applying to the court (and they MUST produce the original CCJ to the court AND they court does not normally alllow the creditor to do so without VEEEERY good reason

Link to post
Share on other sites

diddydicky,

 

This is very difficult.

 

The issue is about 3 Judgments.

 

1 is genuine

 

2 have been created

 

In 1993 the OC obtained a CCJ that I have been paying ror 16 years. The OC led me to believe I owed more on the genuine CCJ. I did not find out how much I owed on the ccj until 2008.

 

Unbeknown to me, the OC used my money that I thought was being credited to the genuine CCJ and credited this to another account that I knew nothing about.

 

If I relate this in large amounts people lose track of events as this covers 16 Years.

 

I really need someone to get hold of this for me and help me - I think the matter is too complex.

 

Thanks any way,

 

Marse

 

I treied to contact the Site Members - to no avail.

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Marse,

 

You need to try to get all of the information to hand before we can help.

 

I have read through your thread 4 times in total trying to digest everything and I'll be honest... I can't see what you are trying to achieve here.

 

I'm lost as to whether you are trying to set aside CCJ's, trying to take a creditor to court, trying to resolve payment issues, trying to get a refund etc.

 

You have simply made the case impossible for someone to investigate properly.

 

I would advise seeking the services of a solicitor to help you through the process of doing this as I fear that without the necessary paperwork being posted we are blind as to what help we can give.

 

Normally when people write what you have in #88 I refuse to assist any longer because it's MY free time I spend here trying to help people. But people also need to help themselves.

 

I can't see how these CCJ's now affect you in your life... you might have a grudge against a certain company; join the club. You might have some health difficulties; join the club.

 

See what I am getting at?

 

Do yourself a favour... go and buy a scanner... they're no more than a tenner. Learn how to use it. Post your results. Best investment you will ever make for this case.

 

Regards,

 

VJ

Link to post
Share on other sites

just to add to what Vjohn says,

 

you will find people on here get a bit "twitchy" when posters do not provide documents in relation to their queeries for others to look at and advise on

 

the reason is the number of times that the "opposition" or just plain time wasters come on here to try and wind us up.

 

A scanner costs around 5-10 quid on e bay it is a VITAL tool if you want to get advice on here since in 99% of cases we will need to see the documents you refer to

 

hope that helps you understand why Vjohn has responded as he has

Link to post
Share on other sites

i certainly don't doubt marse!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I have got the scanner and I have uploaded some copies: I am in the process of understanding photobucket.

 

I think, to a point, vj is absolutely correct in that:

 

1: I do not know how to proceed against the dca's solicitor,

 

2: I do not know the optimum or feasilble strategy to use

 

3: I do not know whether to go for a set aside, first, and then go for the money they owe.

 

I would never hide behind my heart problems, and I wanted to show politeness in wishing people well in finishing. The obvious problem with this medium of exchange, is that we cannot see the other's non verbal cues - and that will always be the problem - especially with new people such as me.

 

 

Regards,

 

Marse

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi al

 

Please bear with me, I am climbing the learning curve of photobucket, if you click the hyperlink there are two documents:

 

1: The original Agreement

 

2: The relevant default notice

 

Agreement:

 

I was not present when the salesman completed the agreement. In fact, the first time that I have seen this document was on opening then SAR.

 

I had been living at the address for 5 years - not as stated 12 years

 

I was divorced - not as stated, married

 

I was a council tenant - not as stated, homeowner

 

I had been teaching for a few months - not as stated, 20 years

 

The deposit/allowance is £3495.00 - I did not have 3000 pennies.

 

Is the agreement valid?

 

Default Notice

 

1: The OC led me to believe that I owed a lot more that what appears on the DN

 

2: The DN was sent to my ex-Wife's address in the Midlands, not to my address in London.

 

Is the DN valid?

 

1: Pictures by Marse1863 - Photobucket

 

Marse

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

 

1/ You signed the agreement presumably after it had been filled in.

 

2/ the agreement looks ok

 

3/ the default notice rather generously gave you three months to comply

 

it should have been sent to the address on the agreement (unless you notified them of a change of address) thus if you put your wife's midlands address on the agreement then they were correct to send the DN there

 

4/ You say that there have been no payments and no collection activity on the ccj for over 6 years

 

 

it is the sheer length of time involved - over 18 years, to question these things

 

i really do not think that you will get the ccj set aside after all these years,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The finance calculation looks iffy to me...

 

MarseAPR.jpg

 

But that said, overturning an 18 year old CCJ is tantamount to insanity. I got butchered over trying to overturn a 2 year old one (I did it but only by the skin of my teeth)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi diddydickey

 

I signed an agreement that was hand written. The salesman asked me to sign an agreement that required typing. He told me that it would be typed and that he would post it to me

 

The deposit was in the form of part exchanged car. The deal was exchange a car in any condition and receive £1000. I did not have a vehicle to exchange. The salesman said that he could find one in the yard.

 

This is the point when the CAB told me of the fraud. The car that I "allegedly" exchange was a d-reg Montego - the car that I was buying was a F-reg Nissan. Why would I purchase a F-reg when I had a d-Reg?

 

The Default Notice:

 

To remedy the breach I had until 4th November - the date of the letter was 21st October - not three months.

 

When I purchased the car I was residing at the matrimonial home in the Midlands (1989). In 1991 I relocated to London. The CAB informed the OC on a number of occasions that I did not reside at the matrimonial home. I also provided them with my address and a telephone contact number. (I do have the copies of all the relevant letters.)

 

The OC sent all letters to the incorrect address, despite the fact that they had been informed otherwise.

 

I did not find out these facts until 2009 when I received the SAR.

 

 

Regards

 

 

Marse

Edited by Marse
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi vj

 

The salesman asked me how much I could afford to pay per month, to which I replied, no more that £140 per month.

 

THe CAB cried fraud when then saw the financia details. In the SAR there is a note that I part exchanged a relatively new car which was a mere two years older that the car I eventually purchased.

 

The dealer which sold the car went out of business about 4 months after purchase, and these people are in the CAB's database.

 

 

Regards

 

Marse

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...