Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You will probably get a couple more reminders followed by further demands fro unregulated debt collectors with even increasing amounts to pay. They are all designed to scare you into paying.  Don't. It's a scam site and they do not know who was driving and they know the keeper is not liable to pay the PCN. Also the shop was closed so they have no legitimate interest in keeping the car park clear. So to charge £100 is a penalty as there is no legitimate interest which means that the case would be thrown out if it went to Court.  Keep your money in your wallet and be prepared to ignore all their letters and threats. Doubtful they would go to Court since a lot more people would not pay when they heard  MET lost in Court. However they may just send you a Letter of Claim to test your resolve.  If yoy get one of those, come back to us and we will advise a snotty letter to send them.  You probably already have, but take a look through some of our past Met PCNs to see how they are doing.
    • Hello, been a while since I posted on here, really hoping for the same support an advice I received last time :-) Long, long story for us, but basically through bad choices, bad luck and bad advice ended up in an IVA in 2016. The accounts involved all defaulted, to be expected. In 2018, I got contacted by an 'independent advisor' advising me that I shouldn't be in an IVA, that it wasn't the solution for our circumstances and that they would guide us through the process of leaving the IVA and finding a better solution. I feel very stupid for taking this persons advice, and feel they prey on vulnerable people for their own financial gain (it ended with us paying our IVA monthly contribution to them)-long and short of it our IVA failed in 2018. At the same time the IVA failed we also had our shared ownership property voluntarily repossessed (to say this was an incredibly stressful time would be an understatement!) When we moved to our new (rented) property in August 2018, I was aware that creditors would start contacting us from the IVA failure. I got advice from another help website and started sending off SARs and CCAs request letters. I was advised not to bury my head and update our address etc and tackle each company as they came along. Initially there was quite a lot of correspondence, and I still get a daily missed call from PRA group (and the occasional letter from them), but not much else. However, yesterday i had a letter through from Lowell (and one from Capital One) advising that they had bought my debt and would like to speak with me regarding the account. There will be several.of these through our door i suspect, as we did have several accounts with Capital One. Capital One have written to us with regular statements over the last 5 years, and my last communication with them was to advise of of our new address (June 2019), I also note that all of these accounts received a small payment in Jan2019 (i'm assuming the funds from the failed IVA pot). Really sorry for the long long post, but just thought id give (some of) the background for context.... I guess my question at the moment is.....how do I respond to Lowell...do I wait for the inevitable other letters to arrive then deal with them all together or individually...? Do I send them a CCA?  Many thanks
    • hi all just got the reminder letter, I have attached it and also the 2nd side of the original 1st pcn (i just saw the edit above) Look forward to your advice Thanks   PCN final reminder.pdf pcn original side 2.pdf
    • The airline said it was offering to pay $10,000 to those who sustained minor injuries.View the full article
    • The Senate Finance Committee wants answers from BMW over its use of banned Chinese components by 21 June.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Advent Computer Training (Hitachi Capital Finance) Discussions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3934 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 299
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi everyone ive just been reading the FAQ'S on the pkf website and saw this section.

5. What about the Hitachi Students and the Cash Students?

Unfortunately, it does not appear that the buyers will be in a position to complete the training

requirements of the Hitachi Students and the Cash Students.

If, on completion of the sales to the buyers, this ultimately becomes that the case, these students will be

advised accordingly.

The buyers may ultimately be in a position to complete the training requirements of the Hitachi Students

and the Cash Students, but this is likely to be at the expense of the Hitachi Student or the Cash Student.

 

am i right in thinking this is because they have nothing to gain from us??? the reason barclays are insisting on a new provider for their students is because they are charging an extortionate rate and stand to make a great profit from them! am i right in thinking this?:confused:

 

Hi

I am a Barclays financed advent student I was reading your thread.. my loan was taken out just before Christmas 2009 I never got a chance to get any training I was abroad and decided to start when I got back mid January.

I thought you should know my loan was for over three years at 0% interest... I am aware that others did not get such terms and have high interest payments :( .

 

I never received information from Barclays in January.. and the email from Advent went into my spam box, my first communication from Barclays was just over a week ago.

But I never the less was aware of what was going on due to seeing the articules on the news media.

I had first contacted Barclays end of January and the guy was helpful enough told me what he knew told me that they would have something to tell me in about a month and that Barclays had over 6,000 students with the same problem as me (all advent sudents??).

 

so I waited and got nothing so I called again and got an irritated young lady who was short with me and could tell me nothing except that it was not Barclays fault Advent went bust, according to her they heard about it at the same time we did, I did manage to get her to freeze my account.

Not that it worked they still took out money in March so I had to call them to give it back.

 

the past few days have been reading we are to be pushed at computeach.

I have been a student with them before, long time back.

I dont think they will have changed much, they have internal exams and have a high pass mark.. at the time when I took mine the questions were not multiple choice and were vague and could have answers depending on your interpretation of the question, that way they kept the students back by failing them repeatedly with the same exam paper until enough had moved forward to keep their training days booked with more bodies at least that what we noticed, so expect a longer than usual training time on each module.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had first contacted Barclays end of January and the guy was helpful enough told me what he knew told me that they would have something to tell me in about a month and that Barclays had over 6,000 students with the same problem as me (all advent sudents??).

 

A number of companies closed up shop when BPF withdrew finance facilities including Red Driver Training.

 

Have you nt seen this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/students/244467-advent-computer-training-barclays-85.html

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

A number of companies closed up shop when BPF withdrew finance facilities including Red Driver Training.

 

Have you nt seen this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/students/244467-advent-computer-training-barclays-85.html

 

David

 

Yes.. I was answering the guy with my post about high interest charges from barclays

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone knows how much time they've got, to pay monies back if i would accept their offer?

 

Hi lewandot I was given 10 days to accept my offer. So I think if u accept they'll prob give the old 14 days trick just to keep u hanging on! I have not accepted mine and I am a bit worried they might try and force another provider now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can't force you to take another provider, i think i could probably fight for more, but i'm tired ... i think i'll take it - better than nothing, and it will give me enough money to finish course myself

 

yeah i understand where your coming from its gettin on my nerves now!

the thing is they claim i have done more than i actually have and they are planning on offering me 770 back thus charging me 1980 for 2 books, no exams and no workshops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they can't force you to take another provider, i think i could probably fight for more, but i'm tired ... i think i'll take it - better than nothing, and it will give me enough money to finish course myself

Please PM me before you make any decisions. You may be interested in some information I have.

 

Everyone: My offer of information is still open. You are warmly invited to contact me for further details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As with any situation like this, accepting the first offer because it is something and not being bothered to fight for more is what all companies hope for in this situation. They know that they are required to pay up hence why they 'accept their obligations' under their contracts. Seeing as they have already made an offer they cannot turn that around now and change their minds, you all have it in writing. It sounds like a long path to go down and the chances are they will suddenly pay up when they realise people are willing to go to court as it would only cost them more overall. Fight it and get back what you rightly deserve, however if you beleive the offer you have got is fair then take it, just please nobody here take it then notice you could have ended up with 2k rather than 500 for the sake of a few extra letters and a month or 2 of waiting and only to regret in the long run.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I've been on the Barclays Partner Finance thread and you'll have heard BPF have replaced Advent with Computeach God help us!!

What I would like to know if someone could oblige to help us, did you all threaten Hitachi in letters, or S75 cca or do you know why they are offering refunds did they explain anything to you. We are trying to find if we can fight this in court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willum could you please pm me with the info that you speak of.

If my pm box is full - send it to site team via red triangle.

 

Thanks

 

Martin

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bluedo,

I myself simply wrote a letter stating that I sought a refund with reference to S75 of the CCA 1974. In due course they replied stating that they accept their obligations under the act and offered me a refund. Needless to say the offer was not great hence why I am still fighting for my full refund the same as everyone else. Sorry I can't recommend something that can get the ball rolling with BPF.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gaz For reply

That's interesting that they say they were accepting their obligations under the cca. And they feel obligated must mean maybe BPF should also be obligated to refund.

Now I'm wondering if BPF can be made to do the same.Except they've came up with this Computeach and they think that's them fulfilling their obligations.

 

We've all done the same as you guys, sent letters quoting S75 cca and frustrated contract 1943 got that from a lawyer nothings worked. Don't want to accept Computeach as that's out the frying pan into the fire.

Good Luck to you all here hope you get good offers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Gaz For reply

That's interesting that they say they were accepting their obligations under the cca. And they feel obligated must mean maybe BPF should also be obligated to refund.

Now I'm wondering if BPF can be made to do the same.Except they've came up with this Computeach and they think that's them fulfilling their obligations.

 

We've all done the same as you guys, sent letters quoting S75 cca and frustrated contract 1943 got that from a lawyer nothings worked. Don't want to accept Computeach as that's out the frying pan into the fire.

Good Luck to you all here hope you get good offers

 

 

Hi Bluedo,

 

Im guessing the main difference is Hitachi have nothing to gain as it is interest free and that most of us have probably progressed further/paid more and been on the course longer than the BPF guys - making it not viable to go with another provider.

 

Hitachi seem to be willing to write off around 50% for most people (around 2000) whereas BPF will lost several times that. There are also a LOT less people on Hitachi than BPF as evidenced by the size of both threads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bluedo,

 

Im guessing the main difference is Hitachi have nothing to gain as it is interest free and that most of us have probably progressed further/paid more and been on the course longer than the BPF guys - making it not viable to go with another provider.

 

Hitachi seem to be willing to write off around 50% for most people (around 2000) whereas BPF will lost several times that. There are also a LOT less people on Hitachi than BPF as evidenced by the size of both threads.

 

Thanks David for explaining that. Good Luck with your refunds. We'll keep trying to find something to help us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

My 8 weeks of waiting for my complaint to be resolved is almost up as of this coming Friday. If i haven't received a satisfactory resolve by then I will be taking it to the FO our complaints procedure and how to complain

 

I will let you know on my progress.

 

Fight the Power! Stand your ground! The customer is always right especially under the S75 CCA!

 

Peace

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received an email from Computeach stating that have my details. They're requesting that i verify my enrollment which is BS. I did not sign with computeach so i am now raising my complaint to the FO.

 

Will let you know what happens next

Link to post
Share on other sites

Willum do you think that the email is just a mass sent 1? meaning every1 who had training with advents has had their details sent to computeach? it says on the PKF website that the new provider is not going to be taking on the HCF or cash students?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with BPF, but I think that Computeach have got access to the whole database of ADvent students, hence why you have all got emails too. I'm pretty sure that if you "verified", they would then send you the "financial outlay" required to finish the course.

 

But DON'T verify yourself to them, as this is an indication that you accept Computeach and may endanger any chance of a refund.

 

If anyone wants to know what exams to take to get certified and what books to buy, PM me and i'll let you know - my employer is an MS Gold partner so we have access to a lot of training material that I can recommend :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the course for 15 months and not even passed the A+ essentials yet. I have paid so far £2400 to Hitachi capital and i have got an offer back of £1240. Its a rip-of but im just gonna take it and carry on with my studies by myself. cant be bothered holding out for another few months just to get another £400 quid off them or something like that.

 

God luck to everyone else :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the course for 15 months and not even passed the A+ essentials yet. I have paid so far £2400 to Hitachi capital and i have got an offer back of £1240. Its a rip-of but im just gonna take it and carry on with my studies by myself. cant be bothered holding out for another few months just to get another £400 quid off them or something like that.

 

God luck to everyone else :)

 

mate thats just under a 50% refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...